Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LOL! Listen to Freepers on why they lost and how they wish they'll win back Senate in '08...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
woldnewton Donating Member (402 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 02:30 PM
Original message
LOL! Listen to Freepers on why they lost and how they wish they'll win back Senate in '08...
Edited on Thu Nov-09-06 03:04 PM by woldnewton
To: "staytrue"

That's the winning attude this place needs!
We've really, really, got to get the message to all our candidates to go farther right. The cowards always think they have to go to the middle, but in the end, conservativeness always wins.

They lost this election because they went too far left in Washington. Even the democrats were running farther to the right than many of our people.

23 posted on 11/08/2006 9:24:07 PM PST by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal.")


On edit -- another interesting tidbit. I just *had* to post this here...

"This, of course, presumes that our nation will survive that long. Given the encouragement the Democrats' victory gives to terrorists, and that party's unwillingness to oppose them, I wouldn't consider 2008 elections taking place to be a given."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. They all have the madness of King George
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
twilight_sailing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. Please do.
"We've really, really, got to get the message to all our candidates to go farther right."

Please, please, please.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zookeeper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. We can only hope they take his advice....
and we'll keep our new majority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texastoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. That's Rove's M.O.
You see, the "middle" is relative to two finite points. Otherwise, there is no middle. If a nutjob like Rove is taking the right even farther, what happens to the middle? A lot of Dems fell right in line like Rove expected (while he laughed at them).

The fascists didn't win because the people spoke and said "enough." That's what old clueless staytrue doesn't get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woldnewton Donating Member (402 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. Actually, it was 'concerned about politics' who wrote that...
Edited on Thu Nov-09-06 03:30 PM by woldnewton
CAP was just responding to something some other Freeper weirdo named 'staytrue' posted.

Anyway, I'm also monitoring there look forward to 2008 chart of Dem senate seats they consider vulnerable (or far from it). Check it out...

Arkansas: Pryor (D) U

Delaware: Biden (D) K

Illinois: Durbin (D) K

Iowa: Harkin (D) K

Louisiana: Landrieu (D) P

Massachusetts: Kerry (D) K

Michigan: Levin (D) K

Montana: Baucus (D) U

New Jersey: Lautenberg (D) K

Rhode Island: Reed (D) K

South Dakota: Johnson (D) P

West Virginia: Rockefeller (D) K


Code:
U = Unlikely
P = Possible
K = Are you kidding me?


Meanwhile, here's their take on their own seats up for relection:

Wayne Allard - CO (very vulnerable)
Susan Collins - ME (likely safe)
Thad Cochran - MS (likely safe)
Elizabeth Dole - NC (possibly vulnerable)
Pete Domenici - NM (potential open seat, vulnerable)
Chuck Hagel - NE (likely safe)
James Inhome - OK (GOP advantage)
Pat Roberts - KA (vulnerable, if Dems recruit Sebelius)
Ted Stevens - AK (safe, as long as he lives)
John Warner - VA (very vulnerable, Mark Warner will run)
Lamar Alexander - TN (potentially vulnerable)
Saxby Chambliss - GA (likely safe)
Norm Colemans - MN (very vulnerable)
John Cornyn - TX (likely safe)
Lindsey Graham - SC (safe Republican)
Mitch McConnell - KY (GOP advantage)
Jeff Sessions - AL (likely safe)
Gordon Smith - OR (vulnerable -- it's Oregon)
John Sununu -- NH (very vulnerable -- NH trending badly)
Mike Enzi -- WY (likely safe)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. Is "conservativeness" a word now?
nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ellis Wyatt Donating Member (328 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. parrotting
What Rush said yesterday.

If by "conservative" they mean fiscally, then sure they have a point. A lot of republicans and libertarians either sat home or voted out the republicans because Bush & Co have been absolutely atrocious on spending. The fiscal right hated the Drug Bill, and have hated the fact that while Clinton cut federal jobs by 200,000 during his term, Bush has increased them by 85,000.

If by "conservative" they mean: step up the hate on gays, immigrants, and women who get abortions, then wow, that's just frighteningly retarded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Penndems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
7. "We've really, really, got to get the message to all our candidates to go farther right"
Wow, they didn't learn anything Tuesday night, did they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
8. Is "conservativeness" even a word?
But...: "Even the democrats were running farther to the right than many of our people." Jeezuss..... makes me shudder. Why? Because he's partly right... er, correct. But, not all the Democrats.

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lochloosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Believe it or not....Yes
Con`serv´a`tive`ness
a. 1. The quality of being conservative.
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Conservativeness
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
racaulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
9. The Dems were running further right than the Repukes???
Edited on Thu Nov-09-06 02:38 PM by racaulk
Like Casey was further right than Santorum?

Like Nelson was further right than Harris?

Like Whitehouse was further right than Chafee?

Like Lamont was further right than Schlessinger?

Pah-leeeze! These people are absolutely insane. If nothing else, we won several key races by running moderates (i.e. Casey) against their right-wing nutbags (i.e. Santorum). We approached the center while the right pandered to their "base," and the right paid for it royally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lazyriver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
10. I have to wonder...
what color is the sky in their little bizzaro world?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ferret Annica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
11. Considering they will be defending 21 seats to the Democratic 12
the next election, they can dream, but it is delusion at best to think the Repugs will get the majority in either the House or Senate any time soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllegroRondo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. good point - which seats are up in 2008?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ferret Annica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. Here is an article about the upcoming Senate races:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rep the dems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. I don't know a whole lot about most of our seats there, but
Durbin, Kerry, and Biden should have no trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
14. So beyond fascism, what is further right than that? anyone? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmperorHasNoClothes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
16. The worst thing you can do to a minority hater
is put them in the minority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rocknrule Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
17. "In the end, conservativism wins"
Yea, like how conservatism "won" in 1944 Germany
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
18. Go further right????
How could they, without falling off the right-hand side of the world? Which they probably still do believe is flat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az_lefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
20. considering Genghis Khan is their role model, I'm not surprised at this
their going to get clobbered again in 08'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
22. To the right of Santorum and Hayworth?
Go for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anarcho-Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
23. I'm not sure where 'farther right' will be
Mandatory executions for not doing it in the missionary position?
Being arrested for not having a Bible when a police officer stops you?
Women banned from voting, and a wealth/property qualification for voting rights?
Life imprisonment and huge fines for accidentally seeing a titty?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
24. Yes -- "Hitleresque" should be the Republican goal, Freeps. Good strategy there!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC