Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clark and Bayh are the only ones who could win the Electoral College

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
BluegrassDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 12:13 AM
Original message
Clark and Bayh are the only ones who could win the Electoral College
Forget Feingold, forget Gore, forget Edwards, forget Hillary. Obama's not running. When you sit down and look at the map with hard numbers, those are the only candidates that could pull a red state or two. Folks on here need to realize that we need candidates that appeal to people outside of New York and California if we want to WIN. We don't need a Republican-lite, but we need someone who won't scare the shit out of people in the flyover states, like a Bill Clinton.

Clark could carry Arkansas and may help in other upper south states. Bayh would carry Indiana and would pull Kentucky and Ohio along with him. Both Clark and Bayh could appeal to western states like Colorado as well.

I like Clark and Bayh, but they will both put a corpse to sleep. They would both need to pick a VP whose charismatic and energetic like Barack Obama.

I love Gore, but he can't even win in Tennessee. I don't wanna go down that road again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. Sez you.
Edited on Fri Nov-10-06 12:16 AM by aquart
Clark can't get arrested and I wouldn't have Bayh in my house, let alone the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BluegrassDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Sez me is right...
I'll wait for someone to give me a reason why I'm wrong and who else in our friggin' party can get us 270 EV's? Look at the map please and tell me. Progressives will be energized in '08 no doubt, but carrying the west coast and New England is not helping us win a damn thing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Gore, Fiengold, Clark, Richardson, Edwards, and Vilsack are all viable
and for different reasons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Comicstripper Donating Member (876 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #5
22. Will do:
Edited on Fri Nov-10-06 01:20 AM by Comicstripper
First of all, almost ANY Democrat can win in 2008 because Ohio has gone blue. It was close in '04, it'll be ours in '08. Other states are trending that way, too, including Colorado and even Montana (though doubtful for president...)Add those to the states that Gore/ Kerry got, and we win. But we want to be SURE, so:

-Obama (who I agree probably will not run, but who very well could) energizes Southern blacks and may tip closer states.
-Edwards could win home state of North Carolina, birth state of South Carolina (doubtful), and certainly Arkansas (with Clinton help), as well as organizing Mid-Western Dems
-Richardson takes New Mexico and possibly Arizona, even potentially Florida by energizing Hispanic voters there. It's a close state.

Of course, Clark and Bayh win other states as well, you're right. And theirs' may be more certain (certainly Bayh's).

I'm not sure of any of this, and I don't want to sound stupid or overly confident. Just remember, the campaign is already well under way, and as anyone can see, the political landscape now is MUCH different than it was in '04 and '00. Bush will be in office for two more years, and he won't be getting any smarter, any more effective, or any less stubborn. I think the Dems win in '08, ALMOST regardless of who is nominated. John McCain could run against Jesus himself and probably at least draw it out to a re-count. Anyone else loses. And McCain is hardly a shoo-in; neo-cons dont trust him, and more moderate voters may very well see him as close to Bush come next election. He may be screwed from both sides.

Just my opinion, sorry to ramble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor Panacea Donating Member (223 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yeah, sez you
When you mention Bayh, I want to puke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
3. Clark DOES not put folks to sleep....
The "meme" assigned to him by the corporate media after all else had failed and he refused to "fade away" was "Not ready for Primetime".

Well, he's ready now! :patriot:

Watch this interview from back in 2003 where he does a smackdown on the Foxasshole As(s)man!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=awXaGp-KLNI

And watch this one....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_8aOiMmekGk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BluegrassDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Clark is not a super speaker
He appears kinda feeble. I know I'm not the only one who thinks this. My mother thinks the same thing. He doesn't have a very strong and stout appearance. Being a general is really the only thing that saves him. He has a fantastic resume and could be the kinda guy we need in war time. That's why he'll be a good nominee. He knows a thing or two about fighting wars. However, that doesn't negate the fact that he's no Barack Obama on the campaign trail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. I disagree with you AND your mother.....


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #8
17. You're forgetting another huge positive about Clark, everybody in the party LOVES him
While Bayh will be campaigning to the right of Hillary and Feingold to the left of her, Clark is the ONLY candidate that both liberals and moderates can get excited about. His endorsements last time ranged from Micahel Moore and George McGovern to Congressman Gene Taylor of Mississippi.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Don't forget Madonna, McGovern and Max Baucus!
That's a pretty wide spread!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. Yea I'm just using Taylor and Michael Moore to define the spectrum
But yea Madonna is pretty key.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
4. CLARK/OBAMA '08!!!!
I think that's the most bulletproof ticket we've got, and they wouldn't be dependent on MSM support. And after four to eight years of looking over a president's shoulder, Obama would be too seasoned to have his race held against him if he wanted to run.

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hieronymus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. I like Clark a lot and a combination of Clark and Obama
just might win.:think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
6. Bullshit
Edited on Fri Nov-10-06 12:25 AM by Bleachers7
Clark is a good candidate, though I worry about this politicking skills. I'm sure he's better politically and with the issues than in 2004. Bayh isn't going anywhere. He won't win a single primary outside of Indiana. Feingold is the dark horse. Hillary is the favorite. Edwards is the smart kid that's going to be unlucky.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BluegrassDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. I forgot about Bill Richardson!
Oops...New Mexico, Arizona, Nevada, and Colorado would be HUGE with him on the ticket. But I heard he's a bimbo eruption waiting to happen. Can't be having that shit in 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueManDude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
9. Anyone but Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
12. bayh, hillary & vilsack are dlc cheerleaders.
free trade, America first, dlc cheerleaders ARE rethug lite.

Please no more dlc presidential candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #12
29. ..which certainly works in their favor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Placebo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
13. Who says Obama isn't running?
He seems to have given every indiction he will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shireen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
14. you've never heard Clark speak ...
he's incredible. Really really good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
16. Clark-Richardson.
Hillary wants to be majority leader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
returnable Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 01:06 AM
Response to Original message
19. Come on. I'm a Clarkie, but even I don't speak in absolutes (any more)
There are plenty of potential contenders who could win a general election. And for the record, I doubt Bayh is one of them :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
21. You can't have a VP that outshines a President
Whoever became VP with Bayh would have to work real hard not to outshine him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Placebo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 01:42 AM
Response to Reply #21
26. Which is why Obama would never be picked as VP.
He outshines everyone except the Clintons or Gore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 01:21 AM
Response to Original message
23. Please... each election is different
There has been massive change since 2000.

Gore has been vindicated in almost every position he took.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 01:28 AM
Response to Original message
24. What are you talking about? Al Gore's definitely a viable candidate--
Especially after all the work he did for Katrina relief. His charisma, too, has taken a dramatic turn for the better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oleladylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #24
32. Nope, I think we have to move beyond Gore AND Kerry. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
featherman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
25. No Senators... they do not win
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #25
30. Bayh served two terms as Governor of Indiana
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 06:27 AM
Response to Original message
27. Wow. Just wow.
I don't recall when I last saw a post that revealed such cluelessness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. I'd be curious to know what you find clueless about it.
I would certainly open the field up to include a couple more with the best potential, but surely not netroot favorites like Feingold and now, sadly, Gore. Howard Dean? Snowball's chance in hell.

So what do you find clueless about the post? Strong evidence suggests Bayh would carry Indiana based on the Democrats doing so well there on Tuesday. Evidence also suggests he wouldn't lose any states won by Kerry in 2004.

As always, national security is of vital importance in the electorate's minds and Wes Clark certainly feels those shoes - and he's southern to boot. He won the Dem primary in OK, and came in second in four others. It is certainly conceivable he'd win a southern state or two while, again, carrying all states Kerry won.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oleladylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
31. Clark and Obama..would like to see Hillary in cabinet, also Nancy. n/t
Edited on Fri Nov-10-06 08:26 AM by Oleladylib
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riona Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
33. Clark/Napolitano
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC