Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Corporation supporting "free" traders lost really big on Tuesday

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 08:36 AM
Original message
Corporation supporting "free" traders lost really big on Tuesday
http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/44121/

There's more than just anecdotal evidence that this is a winning strategy: there was an almost perfect correlation between calling bullshit on the bipartisan trade consensus of the Bush (and Clinton) administration(s) and winning, regardless of party or region. Consider this analysis put out yesterday by Public Citizen (PDF):

• House races where fair traders replaced anti-fair traders: 16 (nine pending)
• Senate races where fair traders replaced anti-fair traders: 5
• House races where fair traders took open seats vacated by anti-fair traders: 11
• Senate races where fair traders took open seats vacated by anti-fair traders: 1
• House races where anti-fair traders replaced fair traders: 0
• Senate races where anti-fair traders replaced fair traders: 0

Those included Congressional seats in traditionally "red" states including Missouri, Kentucky, Virginia, Montana, West Virginia and North Carolina.

On top of the success of so many "fair-traders," all six minimum wage increases passed on state ballots -- with 76 percent of the vote in Missouri and 73 percent in Montana -- despite the decades-long campaign by the corporate right to convince people that minimum wage hikes kill jobs.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dmosh42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. important post!
These posts slip by so fast that we miss some. This issue of 'free traders' is a very important event, because of the economy and job creating factors involved. Even as I read your post, I just heard how the administration is now quickly gearing up to finish this deal with SE Asian countries,(Vietnam) in order to get more slave wage countries competing against our industry. Bush wants this done before the Dems get in there. I wonder if there are any ways they can keep it from happening, other than making it very public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Any organized opposition to this?
Please let us know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brokensymmetry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. Excellent news! K&R! n/t
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
williesgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Another kick for the night crowd
This is a really important lesson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1932 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 01:23 AM
Response to Original message
6. In the 2004 primaries, fair trade became an issue in the Wisonsin primary
Edited on Sat Nov-11-06 01:25 AM by 1932
and it was the first and only time during the primaries when I felt like voters were energized and thoughtful on not only an issue that mattered, but an issue that Democrats could build a victory upon.

These are the "Caring Democrats" that people can get energized about supporting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 01:32 AM
Response to Original message
7. perfect- 'FAIR trade'
and 'anti-fair' trade (the con artist formerly known as FREE trade).

recommended
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bullshot Donating Member (807 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
8. It was one of Sherrod Brown's big talking points in his victory over DeWine,
Edited on Sat Nov-11-06 09:34 AM by Bullshot
who was a two-term incumbent who had never been in a tight race before this year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Irreverend IX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
9. This is one of the most important things to turn around.
If Dems can build a track record of protecting US jobs and improving the economy by 2008, the presidency will be ours for the taking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC