Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NY Times: Half of incoming Democratic freshmen planning on joining the New Democrat Coalition

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 02:33 PM
Original message
NY Times: Half of incoming Democratic freshmen planning on joining the New Democrat Coalition
Edited on Fri Nov-10-06 02:35 PM by wyldwolf
About half the incoming Democratic freshmen are already planning on joining the New Democrat Coalition — a generally centrist group that emphasizes economic competitiveness and national security issues. They include Ed Perlmutter of Colorado, a former state senator who had a legislative reputation for working with Republicans; Michael A. Arcuri of upstate New York, a seasoned district attorney; and Tim Mahoney, the Florida businessman who won the seat that the Republican representative Mark Foley resigned because of the Congressional page scandal.

Other Democrats in the group intend to enlist with the Blue Dog Coalition, a more conservative group viewed as having a more rural outlook and a focus on balancing the budget.

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/09/us/politics/09cong.html?_r=1&ei=5094&en=21fd9be66d7df098&hp=&ex=1163048400&adxnnl=1&partner=homepage&adxnnlx=1163186994-ykuQ+wO6r7uQ/dg0ogn+dA&oref=slogin

Not bad for an organization that was to be made radioactive and has been declared "irrelevant" by the great political minds of DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. So where the heck's the group that's gonna look after our
civil rights and support peace and care about the poor and old and sick???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. that would be them... unless, of course...
..you can provide some evidence to the contrary?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cybildisobedience Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. it sounds as if it's half conservative Dems, half centrist
Unless I read it wrong --
where's the progressive wing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. Well IMHO the description made BOTH groups sound like
different variations of Republican Lite, with nary a mention of social justice issues.

I'm ASKING THE QUESTION here, it's not MY job to provide evidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Did I not answer the question? Why, yes I did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
19. I doubt a majority will support civil rights for gay folks- but I hope to be pleasantly suprised.
Edited on Fri Nov-10-06 03:04 PM by Dr Fate
Marriage being a civil right, of course.

At the very least I would prefer they just not adress it all as opposed to agreeing with the far, Religious right on that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. So now we know who to thank for the new majority
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbgrunt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. so is the "new democratic coalition" the same as the DLC?
....and how many are joining the progressive caucus?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 02:40 PM
Original message
yes... and to answer your other question...
if almost half are joing the DLC, and 9 or joing the Blue Dogs...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiviaOlivia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. I consider them corporatists
and the same as the DLC.

from wiki:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Democrat_Coalition

New Democrat Coalition is an organization within the United States Congress. It is made up of 20 Democratic Senate members and 40 Democratic members of the House of Representatives who claim moderate and pro-business stances.

The group was founded in 1997 by Representatives Cal Dooley (California), Jim Moran (Virginia) and Tim Roemer (Indiana) as a congressional affiliate of the avowedly centrist Democratic Leadership Council, whose members, including former President Bill Clinton, call themselves "New Democrats." As of February 2005, the House New Democrats are chaired by Representative Ellen Tauscher (California), with Representatives Artur Davis (Alabama) and Ron Kind (Wisconsin) serving as co-chairs. Representative Adam Smith (politician) (Washington) serves as chair of the group's political action committee.

The Senate New Democrats were founded in 2000 by Senators Evan Bayh (Indiana), Bob Graham (Florida), Mary Landrieu (Louisiana), Joe Lieberman (Connecticut) and Blanche Lincoln (Arkansas).

The NDC has worked to craft and pass legislation, including Permanent Normal Trade Relations (PNTR) for the People's Republic of China, fast track Trade Promotion Authority, digital signatures, and H-1B visa reform and continues to work on matters such as privacy, broadband, expanding e-learning opportunities and making government more accessible and efficient through the use of technology. Many in the party's left wing criticize the group, however, for their alleged lack of focus on social justice and the poor, the party's traditional base.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. Congratulations DLC...you still have your oar in the water
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. Does this mean we can call DLC types "conservative" without getting our posts deleted?
Edited on Fri Nov-10-06 03:00 PM by Dr Fate
Or at least "more conservative?"

;)

I kid- I kid- But seriously- I'm sure we can agree that DEMS need conservative (not far right wingers, but old-time conservatives) who can work with the few sane Republicans that exist on centrist & moderate issues...

I have no problem with old fashioned conservatives working with everyone else- I think it is what a sizable portion of former Republican & moderate voters who just put us in power expect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
9. I saw something earlier saying the progressive caucus was going to be the largest.
I guess we will have to wait and see who is right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Gee, let's check and see where
Paul Hodes and Carol Shea-Porter, to name two, end up.

I bet it's not in the anti-labor, anti-fair trade wing of the Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
10. *rimshot*

Its an important point though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
13. Centrist like this??
Jon Tester's platform:

Supporting renewable and alternative energy sources (biofuels, bitches!)
Raising automobile mileage
Pro-choice
Protecting public lands
Country of origin labels for food imports
Affordable health care
Enforcing immigration laws for immigrants and employers
gun rights
A plan to end the war in Iraq
Increasing the minimum wage
Repealing the Patriot Act
Changing Medicare D to allow price negotiation with drug companies
No to social security privatization
Pro stem cell research
Middle class tax relief

http://atrios.blogspot.com/

People who ran to get something done will bolt from the 'centrist' wing if they keep going down their corporatist path. We aren't going to get 'free' health care, but these folks also aren't going to put up with stupid donut holes and pharmaceutical give-aways either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Exactly- so long as we are talking "centrist" and not "to the right" I am fine.
Edited on Fri Nov-10-06 03:06 PM by Dr Fate
I feel a little weird that some people dont want to acknowledge that all these centrist candidates would have gotten nowhere w/o ALL DEMS, including many lefties, busting their butts and raising money and awareness, GOTV, etc.

"Bush rage" was once a "far left" concept- but now everyone is feeling it.

I think it is dangerous to suggest that progressives are not needed and vice versa.

Progressives did most the boots-on-the-ground work, and certainly many centrists that the DEM Activists helped to get elected will need to work with Republicans to get things done.

Centrist citizens do VOTE- but they dont do much campaigning or election work that I have ever seen. We need both.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elidor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
15. Score one for Oasis
Oh, wait...that's the other DLC guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lcordero2 Donating Member (832 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
16. hmmmmm...
It doesn't fair too well.

Poor people elect them and then they decide to carry the water of rich people. Looks like the Republicans are going to take the House again in 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
17. "Ms. Shea-Porter, with no help from the party,
pulled off one of the upsets of the night in defeating Jeb Bradley."

Wow, no help!

Kerry http://blog.johnkerry.com/2006/10/winning_the_house_carol_shea_porter_in_new_hampshire.html">helped!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
20. Figure is actually over half of new House-elects: 15
Locally, 10th District Rep. Ellen Tauscher, D-Solano, and 7th District Rep. George Miller, D-Solano, both incumbents, won decisive victories in constituencies that include parts of other counties in addition to Solano.

Tauscher's camp released a statement Wednesday noting that the ranks of the New Democrat Coalition, which the congresswoman chairs, are expected to grow from 47 to 62 members.

http://www.thereporter.com/news/ci_4630044
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angstlessk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
21. Seems the Democratic party mimmics a Parlament..whereas
the republicans are more like a dictatorship!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. That is my take as well- I want to emphasise that we are a coalition..
Edited on Fri Nov-10-06 03:20 PM by Dr Fate
..and I think we can point out that fact w/o suggesting that one faction of the coalition can do without another. (Isee both left & right DUers doing this)

I would prefer it if more discussions were about how we are a coalition- rather than someone on the left or the right suggesting that "they" won it all by themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
23. Looks like the author and Rosenberg are looking mighty hard for trouble that may well not exist.
Edited on Fri Nov-10-06 03:29 PM by flpoljunkie
“How are Senator Reid and Speaker Pelosi going to forge consensus on Iraq and on a budget?” Mr. Rosenberg asked. “Where are we going to end up on these two vital things, given the extraordinary diversity of this new Democratic majority?”

<>“We are the most diversified caucus in the world and we think that is the great strength of the Democratic Party,” said Representative John B. Larson of Connecticut, chairman of the Democratic caucus.

<>The stands some new Democratic senators take could pose difficulties for their own party. Bob Casey of Pennsylvania, who beat Senator Rick Santorum, is an ardent opponent of abortion; Jon Tester, the Montana farmer with a trademark flattop who claimed victory over Senator Conrad Burns, could also emerge as a maverick.

(Guess what, the Dems control the agenda now, and divisive abortion wedge issues, like partial birth abortion, won't be coming up. And I am not worried about John Tester, are you?)

Mr. Reid played down possible divisions, saying that Senate Democrats have shown they can overcome ideological differences. “We have widely varying political philosophies within this team,” he said. “And what we’ve done is we’ve used these team members with their strengths, and we’re going to continue to do that.” (Do they not all stand for economic fairness--and is that not at the core of our party's principles?)

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/09/us/politics/09cong.html?_r=1&ei=5094&en=21fd9be66d7df098&hp=&ex=1163048400&adxnnl=1&partner=homepage&adxnnlx=1163186994-ykuQ+wO6r7uQ/dg0ogn+dA&oref=slogin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. I agree- I detect a vaugue motive of division in all of this.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC