politicasista
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-10-06 08:51 PM
Original message |
| Will the media go easy on the 08 candidiates/nominee unlike 2000 and 2004? |
|
Edited on Fri Nov-10-06 08:58 PM by politicasista
Now that we have won the 2006 election, some are already looking forward to 2008.
Some already have their candidates, but does anyone think the media will be fair and balanced by 2008, depending on who the candidates are or who the nominee is? I mean, really report the facts, accurate information on the candidates, nominee and the rallies.
Explain.
|
| Clark2008
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-10-06 08:52 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. Easy on McCain, hard on HRC and will ignore the one person |
|
who could unite both sides.
That's our media!
|
| AlinPA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-10-06 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 3. Agree. All McCain, HRC with her being demonized by media. |
| The Velveteen Ocelot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-10-06 08:53 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. What is this "fair and balanced" of which you speak? |
|
Edited on Fri Nov-10-06 08:54 PM by ocelot
Short answer: No chance. They are beholden to their corporate masters, and they will shill for whoever favors those masters. They'll pick their favorites -- probably McCain and Hillary -- and "decide" they will be the candidates.
|
| politicasista
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-10-06 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 4. Reporting accurate information about the campaingns and rallies |
|
I didn't see that in 2000 or 2004, which is why I went to the blogs for info.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:23 AM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
