Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why is Montana more blue than other Rocky Mtn. states?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
BluegrassDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 05:08 PM
Original message
Why is Montana more blue than other Rocky Mtn. states?
I'm just curious. I know Clinton carried Montana in 1992. It seems that it's the only Rocky Mountain state besides Colorado where Dems can actually win. But there really is no major urban area there and not much population, but they appear to be more receptive to Dems than Wyoming, Idaho, etc. Montana appears to be more blue than even Nevada, despite them having Las Vegas. Anyone care to enlighten me?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Less stupid people.
More blue. Less stupid. It's the circle of life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. Mining? Mebee?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Unions were my first thought
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
montana500 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. Missoula. Bozeman.
and a sprinkling of hard nosed outdoorsmen who didn't like what the GOP was trying to do to public lands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
26. Bingo!
Go Grizzlies!

(2 semester alumni...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ediacara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. Several disparate reasons
1) Mining and unions. Butte is an old mining town with a long union history. Butte-Silverbow is about as Democratic as Hennepin Co Minnesota (Minneapolis).

2) General urban-rural dynamics. Like all states in the United States, the real red-blue divide is urban-rural. Urban areas are highly Democratic, rural areas are highly Republican. The urban-rural population is actually just about even, so things balance out.

3) Native Americans. Native Americans are the largest ethnic minority in Montana (about 7.5% of the population) and vote heavily Democratic.

4) Lack of strong religious influence. That is not to say that religion is uncommon in Montana, but unlike the South or Utah, religion is only mildly involved in politics rather than synonymous with politics.

5) Influx of west-coasters. This draws the most ire from "old timers," but does increase the Democratic vote.

ALSO: Dems had two House pickups in Arizona this year, and New Mexico has always been seen as the most Dem Rocky Mountain state. It's not just Montana and Colorado

ALSO #2: Idaho and Wyoming are similar in almost all respects to what I just described for Montana except in two areas: Idaho has a more significant Mormon influence, and Wyoming is much much more rural. Additionally, the Native American population is at 3% or less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JudyM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Thanks - this is interesting info for this easterner. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. I'm disappointed with Idaho and Wyoming
Edited on Sat Nov-11-06 07:22 PM by Ignacio Upton
ID elected that lunatic Bill Sali, even after the freakin' Republican Speaker of the State House openly said he was a douchebag and that the reporter could put his quote in the paper. I'm pissed off that Wyoming re-elected that bitch Barbara Cubin after what she did to the Libertarian candidate after the debate. I'm not giving up hope in those states, but seeing Grant and Trauner lose (even if only narrowly) is discouraging.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
danimich1 Donating Member (91 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #13
28. I'm disapointed in Wyoming, too, and I live here
The day after the election I was speaking with a few locals about Cubin. All agreed that they didn't like her, but they didn't really know enough about Trauner to vote for him. All Trauner needed was 400 people voting for him, instead of against him, and he would have won! People here can't see past the party label. I don't know why they're afraid of the dems, since here a dem is the same as what a moderate republican used to be...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. West-coasters have been making Idaho MORE red
I think that the west-coasters coming in are Reaganites from places like Orange County and San Diego.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Yes -- Idaho attracts rightwingers. It's like their little white sanctuary.
Scary.

Still, Idaho is doing the rest of us a favor by containing the freaks and diluting their power in the states they came from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. I know a few very liberal people who live (in all places)
Sandpoint, Idaho. Not so fast, Oregonian! ;-) Oregonians are known for pride in their liberal status (I have family there), but don't be so hasty to judge. You might be surprised in just a few years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. No, of course there are plenty of cool, liberal Idahoans.
But I do think that there is a certain element that is attracted to the hardcore rightwing towns there. Idaho and Utah have the highest Bush approval rate in the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
20. Excellent analysis, DB
I'm another easterner who finds politics in the mountain states as inscrutable as the beauty of its landscape.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
30. Only elected 2 Republican Senators
in its history. I kind of see Montana returning to its roots. I also think there were as many Orange County Republicans that moved to Montana as there were liberals, and confused the vote for a while. I haven't been back in a while, but it would be interesting to see the locals take after some of these people ended up on their school boards and county commissions.

I like that you added Idaho's Mormon influence, I always thought that was important. Montana's religious influence is more Catholic, from Father De Smet to Butte. It does seem to make a difference, all these years later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greendog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Those Orange County Republicans...
...and all the other west coast conservatives moved to the Flathead. They're still here. Their numbers are increasing.

Tester got 40% of the vote in Flathead County. Two years ago Schweitzer got 42% in the Flathead (his home county).

For the last few years, the State Representative from Kalispell was a good Democrat. He was term limited out, and despite a vigorous campaign with lots of cash from the State Democratic Party, his seat was filled with a far right extremist.

Flathead County is growing very fast and it sure isn't getting any more liberal here. In just a few years this could have a serious negative effect on statewide races for Democrats.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
32. Having lived there for some time, I think you've got it; plus
it's that pioneering spirit, which implants a strong libertarian streak.

I'm an Arizonan now, and I see a lot of it here again, too.

Rural areas (where I've gron up almost exclusively) tend to be socially conservative but despise "nanny" government at the same time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. Tester is the "new style" Democrat & Montana is the new kind of melting pot
From what I've heard, Montana is getting to be a unique blend of hippies, rednecks, and folks in between.

Jon Tester, the Democratic winner there, is a blend himself. He looks like a redneck but he talks like a Democrat. He's an organic farmer and he's a gun lover. He's pro environment and I also think he's pro choice.

I heard him speak on TV for the first time the other day and when I first saw him I thought holy shit, this can't be our new Senator from Montana. Then he started answering the reporter's questions, and lo and behold he sounded very very good. He's smart, and I think he's gonna go places.

With people like Tester at the helm, I think you can expect Montana to get even bluer because it's the type of state that's going to attract more "blue" voters to it when they retire or for whatever other reason people are drawn nowadays to the open spaces of the West.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheJollyNihilist Donating Member (79 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. It has a strong libertarian undercurrent.
The current GOP is anything but libertarian. It's turned far authoritarian, which many individualists don't like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Good point and true. Welcome to DU!
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheJollyNihilist Donating Member (79 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Thanks!
Glad to be here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #11
24. I second Karl's comments on both counts.
And I like libertarians. :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheJollyNihilist Donating Member (79 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. That's me!
nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Economic conservatism has also moved the state Democratic
Wasn't Enron involved in the energy deregulation of the state?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
codjh9 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
10. Not just Montana - NM has a strong Dem. senator and 1 out of 3 US Reps are Dem.
And they ALMOST got 2 out of 3 US Reps this time. However, NM *is* schizophrenic, because although they keep re-electing Bingaman to the Senate, they also keep re-electing Dominici, who's a dick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
12. Brian Schweitzer, plus
The leftovers from the progressive farm movement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeblue Donating Member (466 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
16. Colorado
It sure is too bad that no Democratic nominees for PRESIDENT can ever carry Colorado.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Well, Colorado did vote for Clinton in 1992 along with Montana
albeit with Perot's help in both states. However, just because Perot helped, didn't make his influence by itself the reason for why Clinton won in those two states. CO and MT were already more liberal than the rest of the Mountain West.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeblue Donating Member (466 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Sorry
I was 7 in 1992. Regardless, we haven't voted for a blue candidate since. That "scandal" really did a number on the Democratic voters in this state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lurking Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
21. Better weed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
22. The Rocky Mountain states comprise a large area.
Edited on Sat Nov-11-06 09:27 PM by janx
Colorado has not been consistently red, for instance (think Roy Romer), and New Mexico is by no means red. Come to think of it, Wyoming and Idaho are probably the only true "red" Rocky Mountain states, and even that is changing.

It would be interesting to take a long historical look at the Rocky Mountain states with an eye to their political leanings. I love it here in the Rocky Mountain west, having lived here since 1994.

Montanans are very independent. Don't assume that just because a state doesn't have a huge city, its people are uneducated or inferior. Some of us educated people LIKE being away from squabbling crowds and appreciate a gorgeous, clean environment and good country people. When it comes to those, it's hard to beat Montana.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
27. It's not more blue - they hold their politicians accountable there - a novel idea.
They will elect Republicans that can get the job done.
But, if they don't get the job done, they will throw them out of office.

They treat Democrats that way, too.

They call it "holding politicians accountable".
No one is immune from being voted out of office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
33. I think having Schweitzer on the 08 ticket would do wonders for us
in the west and south. Schweitzer is what Bush wished he was. I think progressives would like Schweitzer too. Still Bush won that state by 20% in 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC