Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

VOTE BY IDEOLOGY from CNN exit polls

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 02:40 AM
Original message
VOTE BY IDEOLOGY from CNN exit polls
Just so you know how to read these... In MO, 20% of voters described themselves as "liberal," and of those liberals 13% voted for Talent, 83% for McCaskill. 43% described themselves as "moderate," and of those moderates 35% voted for Talent, 62% for McCaskill. 37% described themselves as "conservative," and of those conservatives 83% voted for Talent, 15% for McCaskill.

TOTAL Talent McCaskill
Liberal (20%) 13% 83%
Moderate (43%) 35% 62%
Conservative (37%) 83% 15%

TOTAL Allen Webb
Liberal (21%) 12% 88%
Moderate (44%) 40% 60%
Conservative (35%) 88% 12%

TOTAL Burns Tester
Liberal (19%) 9% 89%
Moderate (47%) 38% 59%
Conservative (34%) 83% 15%

TOTAL DeWine Brown
Liberal (20%) 12% 88%
Moderate (48%) 35% 65%
Conservative (32%) 77% 23%

TOTAL Santorum Casey, Jr.
Liberal (25%) 7% 93%
Moderate (46%) 35% 65%
Conservative (29%) 80% 20%

TOTAL Chafee Whitehouse
Liberal (25%) 24% 76%
Moderate (56%) 48% 52%
Conservative (19%) 74% 25%

TOTAL Lieberman Lamont Schlesinger
Liberal (26%) 27% 69% 3%
Moderate (53%) 55% 36% 8%
Conservative (21%) 66% 13% 21%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Clarkie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 02:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. 27% of those describing themselves as "liberal" voted for Lieberman.
That's the most facinating statistic to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immerlinks Donating Member (87 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 03:01 AM
Response to Original message
2. Very informative
Shows us who foisted Lieberman on us. Harry needs keep close tabs on him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 03:30 AM
Response to Original message
3. 12% of 'liberals' voted for George Allen?
Of course, there are always some people who just get confused by the questions; but still....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greeneggs708 Donating Member (77 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 03:34 AM
Response to Original message
4. Who Cares
Who Cares about labels.

And most importantly.

Who cares what CNN or the braindead that watch it think
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greeneggs708 Donating Member (77 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 03:34 AM
Response to Original message
5. Who Cares
Who Cares about labels.

And most importantly.

Who cares what CNN or the braindead that watch it think
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. "Who cares?"
People who are interested in how our candidates won & lost these elections.

"Who cares what CNN or the braindead that watch it think"

Uhh... these figures have nothing to do with "what CNN thinks" OR what "the braindead that watch it think." You know what an exit poll is, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minnesota_Lib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 04:21 AM
Response to Original message
6. One thing to remember as to how people ID themselves....
...is the two decade long campaign of Republican stategists to transform "liberal" a pejorative term. I know people who when talking politics you can tell are libs but they insist they are mods. I wouldn't be surprised if anywhere from 5-10% or more of those identifying themselves moderates (or even conservative) are actually liberals or at least weak liberals whom are afraid to admit it because of perceived negative connotations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Awsi Dooger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
7. That's the drift we're looking for in Virginia
In 2004 it was 17% liberal, 38% conservative.

So a change to 21% liberal, 35% conservative turns a net -21 into -14. That's significantly more margin for error.

Looking at those numbers, it's clear Allen woud have been re-elected if this race has been run in 2004.

Lots of small movement in our favor among the other states, but Virginia seems to stand out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
8. The message from this
seems to be:

In a blue state, where liberals outnumber conservatives, we can run a moderate/liberal, catch the moderate vote, and win handily.

In a red state, where conservatives outnumber liberals, we can run a moderate/conservative, catch the moderate vote, and win handily.

What we did right this time was to run more moderate candidates in red states. They went toe to toe with the Republican rightwing candidates and won.

It's not rocket science. If we run a moderate in '08, we will take back the WH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
10. Liberal-Conservative describes only one dimension
To me, the Libertarian-Authoritarian dimension is just as important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sampsonblk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
11. "Moderate" is not an ideology
Its a lack of conviction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I disagree. But either way, those people with a lack of conviction helped us win. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC