Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

448,077 Voters Consistently Hate On Lieberman

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 11:35 PM
Original message
448,077 Voters Consistently Hate On Lieberman
from wonkette



What are the chances?

Ned Lamont got the same number of votes as Lieberman’s Republican opponent in 2000, Phil Giordano.

Is that an invitation to remember the incredible kiddie-sex crimes of the ex-mayor of Waterbury? You’re damn right it is! Make the jump, for America.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Definitely curiouser and curiouser.
Will anybody be able to do anything with this, though?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eliphaslevi Donating Member (69 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. Programmer fucked up
Edited on Mon Nov-13-06 12:34 AM by eliphaslevi
It looks like the computational logic that steals the votes is flawed. The machines and the relevant source code should be impounded now for forensic analysis! Don't forget the memory cards.

HELLO FBI!! ARE YOU READING THIS!! HERE IS A F*CKING CLUE STARING RIGHT AT YOU!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greeneggs708 Donating Member (77 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. Yawn
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dick Diver Donating Member (158 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
4. Maybe Wonkette should investigate his/her sources more.
This is simply wrong and has been debunked on this board at least three times. Check out the official CT Secretary of State site and you'll find Lamont got 480,481 votes. Somebody at CNN or whereever this error originated cut and pasted from the wrong year and a consipiracy theory is born in the blogosphere.

But, but look. 480,481 what a strange number!!!! One three digit number followed by the next in sequence combined to form a six digit number. What are the chances?? It must be diebold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC