Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rove's October surprise...Iran?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
BrewAz Donating Member (147 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 04:13 PM
Original message
Rove's October surprise...Iran?
Edited on Mon Nov-13-06 04:37 PM by BrewAz
What was the Rove “October Surprise? Did I miss it?

Was it supposed to be a war in Iran…following the Israeli attack on Lebanon? Once the Israeli’s marched through Lebanon and chased the Hezbollah in Iran and Syria…they would keep on going. The administration could then justify supporting our ally (Israel) with air patrols and bombing from our fleet in the Persian Gulf.

Why else would Condi/Rummy and Bush drag their feet for 2-3 weeks before they went to the UN? All sounded fishy to me…Another War during the election would have been a Repub wish….

The only problem was that Hezbollah thwarted the Israeli effort…and the October Surprise ended up being a November Purge.

Thoughts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. The surprise was, he didn't have one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hizb'allah works for the Israelis, Karl Rove?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. No I don't think that was the OP's point.
I believe his theory is that the plan was that Israel would attack Lebanon, crush Hezbollah, draw in Syria, and get their war on with Iran, and that this wider mideast war would then carry bushco on to victory.

I don't particularly buy into this theory as I don't think Karl is that clever. Anyway this theory doesn't require Hezbollah complicity. The border incident that was Israel's public excuse for their little expedition was just that, a public excuse, and they could have used any similar incident to start their long planned campaign to shock'n'awe hezbollah into extinction.

Karl's big surprise was Death To Saddam, which was rather pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. The theory does have to include Hizb'allah as complicit.
It was Hizb'allah that attacked first. Without that, anything else is simply speculation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Border incidents, by both sides, were part of the normal state
of affairs. You know that as well as I. The 'they started it' game is ridiculous. Olmert had his operation ready to go waiting for a reasonable public excuse. But we are not going to agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. America's November Surprise
Bye-Bye!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. I think Poppy put a stop to it
From everything I read, from aircraft carriers steaming to the Gulf to squadrons of fighter jets being deployed closer to the Middle East, I think it was planned for October. But about the time that the "Iraq Group" convened (60 days ago or so?) I think it was stopped. Just my theory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. The Saddam verdict. It was supposed to mask massive vote corruption & suppression
Saddam was supposed to justify the surprise GOP upset. Melm*n's warnings to ignore exit polls was almost a confession that he knew the vote was being fixed. And that legendary GOTV army? That wasn't intended to get out the vote as much as to stifle the vote in black and hispanic areas. They succeeded in stealing and depressing a LOT of votes, just not quite enough. They did not anticipate the enormous groundswell of votes for Democrats, or how much the country wants rid of Neocon rule.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. I think he tried to have surprises.. but Americans didn't buy them...

They kept harping on about the thwarting of the "would-be" terrorists on the London flight and how it would have been worse than 9/11.

.... didn't work.

They killed the #2 Al Qaeda leader hundreds of times.

.... didn't work.

They located a new oil source off the Gulf of Mexico the very day the elections started.

.... didn't work.

Benankie's rosey outlook on the economy, not raising interest rates, and lower gas prices knocked the DOW off the charts.

.... didn't work.

They announced the Suddam Hussein verdict two days before the election.

.... didn't work.

And I know there were other things they tried.. but that's all I can remember right off the bat..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC