Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Teamsters Cripple Fort Worth Buses During Election for Perry (R), follow up

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 02:14 PM
Original message
Teamsters Cripple Fort Worth Buses During Election for Perry (R), follow up
As I reported last week, the Teamsters Union in Texas supported Gov. Rick Perry (R) for re-election for governor. One day before the midterm election on Tuesday, the drivers of City of Fort Worth buses, The T, went on strike. They are represented by the Teamsters. Though the city tried to keep the buses rolling, using management as drivers, hiring new drivers, offering free rides, service was reported to be compromised in the first few days of the strike with buses up to several hours late, people forced to leave overcrowded buses, some buses never showing up at all. Tuesday, election day, was the second day of the strike.

The city of Fort Worth (as opposed to it suburbs) has a big Democratic voting base. It also has a lot of citizens that rely on the buses for transportation, people who are too poor to drive, or people who have disabilities or are elderly or who just do not feel the need to maintain a car since the city has a bus system. If you think about the demographics of Democrats, it is easy to imagine that they are more likely to take buses than Republicans. Though the local Democrats did not raise any objections (how could they? Democrats are pro-union.) I am convinced that the Teamster bosses timed their strike to benefit Rick Perry, who was facing stiff competition from three challengers (at one point Democrat Chris bell was within 5 points of Perry). This was a plurality election. Whichever of the four candidates got the most votes, won the election.

Rick Perry won the election. No one knows if voters in Fort Worth did not go to the polls on Tuesday for lack of transportation. However, we do know that the Fort Worth bus drivers believe that they got nothing for their strike.

http://www.dfw.com/mld/dfw/news/local/16008381.htm

"Fort Worth Transportation Authority bus drivers say they haven't decided whether to file a grievance against their union after last week's five-day strike resulted in a contract with no new benefits.

"Teamsters Local 997 voted Saturday to end the strike and accept a three-year contract with McDonald Transit Associates, a company that manages bus service for the authority, also known as the T.

"But fewer than half the union's 155 members took part in the vote, bus operator Bobby Brown said.

"Of 59 ballots cast, 37 were against the contract, 21 were for it and one ballot was voided. Because of the low turnout, a two-thirds majority was needed to reject the contract, so it narrowly passed."

What gives??? The union couldn't wait to go on strike. It was so anxious to get on the picket line, it had to infringe on the voting rights of the poorest citizens of Fort Worth. Then, five days later, the union leadership couldn't wait to get back to work .It held a quicky vote that most members couldnt participate in and ok'd a contract that got no new benefits that a majority of those voting objected to!!!!!

I cite this is more proof that this was a phoney-baloney strike cooked up by some crooked member of the Teamsters management to benefit the re-election commitee of Gov. Rick Perry, Republican, and that this strike had nothing to do with helping the city of Fort Worth bus drivers. These men and women had to endure the anger of their fellow citizens so that some one in their union could get something from Perry, while they got nothing.

The Democrats will not say a word. They can not, since anything they say will be taken out of context to attack all unions, and unions are more important than this one election. However, I hope that members of DU who belong to unions keep this in mind. Watch out for your leaders, especially if you are in the Teamsters. Do not always assume that they have your best interest at heart. If something does not seem right, maybe it isn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. what the HELL is the teamsters' union doing supporting a REPUKE?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rkc3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. It's Texas. Who the eff knows?
Before anyone starts, I was born in Galveston and have family there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Teamsters/Repuke ties go back at least to Nixon.
Nixon even pardoned Hoffa in 1971, apparently a favor to the Teamsters and their mob connections for support that went back to Nixon's days as a young congressman. Remember it was RFK who put Hoffa in prison in the first place. Ironically Hoffa disappeared 4 years later, he was probably safer in prison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. They do it often
They've endorsed many GOP presidential candidates in the past.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. Idiot Teamsters, this is why people don't support
Unions like they use to. They are corrupt and support repukes. They get what they deserve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demosincebirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. Doesn't surprise me. One of Junior's (Hoffa) best friend
is Rep Hoekstra (R) of Michigan. Yea, thats right, the anti union snake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. Meanwhile, Dallas Cpunty voted increasingly Dem.
Tarrant County needs to follow that lead, if the citizenry is allowed to go to the polls and vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
7. I live in Ft. Worth and will say this--
I live in Ft. Worth and will say this-- The T did run free service during the strike. Not in as great a number as a normal day, but all the routes were covered, albeit waiting time averaged 45 minutes longer.

Voter turnout in lower income neighborhoods (which is every neighborhood in Ft. Worth sans one) was greater this year than any previous mid-term election (as per Star Telegram this past Sunday).

Maybe at a later date I'll be proven wrong, but for the time being, I see this as nothing more than an ill-timed coincidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I hoped so too, but the strike resolution left nobody satisfied--except maybe a union official.
The union did not even give the full memebership a chance to vote on the offered contract. When they took a vote with only 50 members present knowing that it would take 2/3 to reject the contract, they took the decision out of union members hands.

This is not how a union should be run. It gives the apppearance of a conflict of interest somewhere. And once conflict of interest arises, you have to start wondering if the Teamsters' endorsement of Perry factored into the equation somewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
9. Early election voting up in Fort Worth. Election day voting down.
Edited on Tue Nov-14-06 09:57 PM by McCamy Taylor
The Tarrant County results make even less sense given the overall picture of election turnout:

http://www.dfw.com/mld/dfw/news/local/15968948.htm

"Tarrant County sees decrease in turnout
By AMAN BATHEJA
STAR-TELEGRAM STAFF WRITER

"A crowded and colorful governor's race and some closely watched local propositions weren't enough to boost voter turnout in Tarrant County.

"With early voting and Election Day ballots combined, about 329,000 people voted in Tarrant County this year, about 36 percent of registered voters, according to Tarrant County Election Administrator Steve Raborn.

"That's down from 2002, the last time Texans picked a governor. That year, 341,292 people voted, or about 39 percent of registered voters in Tarrant County, Raborn said.

<snip>

"In Tarrant County, however, the two major political parties saw a stark drop in straight-ticket voters this year, possibly because of voter support of independent gubernatorial candidates Carole Keeton Strayhorn and Kinky Friedman. Republican straight-ticket voters fell from 110,334 votes in 2002 to 92,878 votes this year. Democratic straight-ticket voters sank from 78,370 votes four years ago to 67,277 votes this year."


Now, compare this to as of the Friday before election day.

http://news.pajamasmedia.com/2006/11/05/11801269_Early_voting_tur.shtml

"Nov. 5, 2006 (McClatchy-Tribune Business News delivered by Newstex) --
More voters turned out for early voting this year than in the last midterm elections four years ago.

"When early voting ended Friday night, 126,415 voters had cast ballots, more than the 111,093 who voted early in 2002, Tarrant County election records show.

"'I believe the increase of the in-person turnout is due to the increased public knowledge about being able to vote early and its convenience," said Christopher Walker, Tarrant County's early voting coordinator."

There was a 14% increase in early voting over 2002, a midterm, gubernatorial year. The county elections administrator was predicting 45% voter turn out based on the early voter turnout. The weather on election day was perfect. The governor's race had provoked lots of interest.

So, what changed between the time when the early voting was so high that the county elections administrator predicted an increased voter turnout and election day, when actual voter turn out was less than it was in 2002? I live in Fort Worth. The only thing I saw different was the fact that the city buses were not running on time.

What I worry about is that someone from the Perry campaign saw that increase in Fort Worth city early voting on Friday and said "This is not good. What if they are voting for Bell, rather than Stayhorn or Friedman?" And so, by Monday, we had a city bus strike that ended up netting city bus drivers absolutely nothing.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ediacara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
11. This is legal?
How is this different from phone jamming or sending out flyers telling people that they'll be arrested at the polling place?

Fuck, how is this even different from hijacking the busses?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I was horrified when I read about the strike on Monday, but swear to God
Edited on Tue Nov-14-06 10:21 PM by McCamy Taylor
when I started making calls to the newspapers and even to the Democrats they acted like it never even occured to them that some people have to take the bus to vote. The Dems were probably just being extra careful not to say a single bad word about a union. I dont know what the newspaper was thinking. Maybe they all have cars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 05:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC