Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

G.O.P. House Leaders Withdraw Vietnam Trade Bill, "deep disappointment and embarrassment" for W.H.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Human Torch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 10:54 PM
Original message
G.O.P. House Leaders Withdraw Vietnam Trade Bill, "deep disappointment and embarrassment" for W.H.
G.O.P. House Leaders Withdraw Vietnam Trade Bill

By STEVEN R. WEISMAN
Published: November 15, 2006



http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/15/business/15trade.html?hp&ex=1163566800&en=87fe6f8f64b83576&ei=5094&partner=homepage

WASHINGTON, Nov. 14 — Prospects for Congressional approval of several free trade bills backed by the administration were thrown into doubt Tuesday when House Republican leaders abruptly withdrew the one aimed at Vietnam on the eve of President Bush’s trip there this week.

The failure of the Vietnam bill was a deep disappointment and embarrassment for the White House, which had hoped that the president would hail its passage as a milestone in improvement in relations with a country where tens of thousands of Americans died more than 30 years ago.

The bill’s failure touched off a fusillade of partisan recriminations, with Republicans blaming Democrats for trying to sabotage the bill and Democrats saying that some Republicans, bitter after losing the election last week, were trying to embarrass Mr. Bush.

Though the bill could come back to the House before the end of the year, some legislative aides said that its future was in doubt, along with that of several other bills lowering trade barriers with poor countries in Asia, Africa and Latin America. The administration remained hopeful, at least on the surface.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. snort!
"..... with Republicans blaming Democrats for trying to sabotage the bill ....."

Ah, the repugs are still the majority as of now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyLib2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. Quaaaaack!

Who knows how many times lame-duckery will override the merits or demerits of anything backed by the administration. Ah,well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Graybeard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. Lame duck limps across Asia...empty-handed.
...a pathetic failure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. Is that a real pic of
the chimpleton? Cause it sure it ugly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverweb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. The show's just beginning, folks!
Edited on Tue Nov-14-06 11:14 PM by silverweb
"...with Republicans blaming Democrats ... and Democrats saying that some Republicans, bitter after losing the election last week, were trying to embarrass Mr. Bush."

LOL

:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
6. Viêtnam's human rights record is atrocious
I don't believe in this corporate-backed "free trade" crap. The only thing I'd accept is fair trade, and if it has no protections for workers or the environment on both sides, then it's not fair, especially if the only ones invited to write the legislation don't include labor and citizens' organizations and environmentalist groups, and if we want to trade with authoritarian regimes that don't have civil liberties, then the trade agreement should also include human rights provisions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC