Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

It's interesting to see all the "I hated him all along" threads now...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 06:56 PM
Original message
It's interesting to see all the "I hated him all along" threads now...
regarding Carville and Murtha. Funny how fast people jump on a shiny new bandwagon when it rolls thru the DU forums...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. hate carville, love murtha..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's been a long time since Carville did anything for the party IMO
So when I hear him trashmouthing about Dean after a historic victory (which was larger than anyone in the media was predicting), I just got to wonder about who's pulling his strings and why. He's an attack dog and bites on command.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. This place has a real "What have you done for me lately?" attitude
I am rather surprised at the short length of time people celebrated our great election victory. In 2 days people were bitching again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doremus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Maybe because that's how long it took Carville and the DLCers to start casting stones.
I didn't see any kvetching until Carville stuck his foot it in ... as usual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. After reading "State of Denial" that did it for me


Sleeping with the Enemy is one thing, telling secrets to the enemy is just too much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. I can't speak for the anti-Murtha crowd, but I've hated Carville for years.
And have never been shy about saying so here on DU. But you maybe haven't been around here very long? (I checked your profile) So I'm not sure how you are arriving at your judgement.

sw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. Carville is just another paid mouthpiece. Murtha is Nancy Pelosi's choice
for her second in command. So with that in mind, I'm defering to Ms Pelosi.

I figure united leadership is better than divided leadership for the Dems.

Beyond that, I like that Murtha came out and questioned the war, but I'm quite sure he's not perfect and neither is his voting record. Such is life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
k_jerome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. no sheeple here. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. You seem to imply John Q. is a sheeple - or did I read that wrong?
Because he definitely is NOT. A "sheeple" is someone who follows blindly. John Q. reflects a pragmatic realization that in realpolitik, leaders get to pick their second in command. The choice is Ms. Pelosi's to make, and she must balance Cong. Murtha's shortcomings with his strengths.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
k_jerome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. i was under the impression this was an office that...
was voted for. she has endorsed him, but I don't believe your equating it with a president appointing cabinet is accurate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Yes, I know the position will be filled by a vote.
Edited on Wed Nov-15-06 08:11 PM by Divernan
But I worked for a state house Dem caucus for 10 years and people campaigning for Speaker typically let other members know who their choice was for Majority Leader. The same held true for the GOP.
That's why I referred to realpolitik.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Actually, (and to really prove I'm not a sheeple) it's up to the house members
Edited on Wed Nov-15-06 07:58 PM by John Q. Citizen
who they pick. I just think at this point it makes sense to have united leadership.

That's just my opinion, and I'm sure however it comes down I'll be able to live with it. I really am not too hot on either candidate.

Also, I'm not sure that k. Jerome was calling me a sheeple in regards to the house #2 position. K. Jerome might just really really really love James Carville and consider him to be the sharpest political mind of the 20th and the 21st century. Maybe the person believes, as Mr. Carville said today, that Newt Gingrich is brilliant and has his pulse solidly on the political mood of the country.

Who knows?


edited to change "that person" to k. Jerome
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
k_jerome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. actually, its the "i defer to blah blah blah"...
she'll do the right thing. even if it is a regressive right winger buddy she is backing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. But Ms Pelosi isn't a regressive right winger, now is she? Mr, Murtha
gets a great ratings from the unions, something I doubt they would confer on a "regressive right winger." He also had the guts to be the first house member to speak out against the illegal and stupid war, something that I'm not sure that your preferred Mr. Hoyer has yet seen as necessary.

So you would prefer that liberal speaker Pelosi (with a very high Naral rating and a very low NRA rating)be saddled with a war monger in the # 2 spot who would be attempting to undercut her because she kicked his ass in the last leadership battle?

Mr. Hoyer and Mr. Murtha appear to have not too dis-similar voting records on many issues. Their main differences are on abortion and guns, which, considering their constituents, makes a lot of sense. My bet is if they exchanged voting records, both would be out of their jobs. Both supported the anti-gay DOMA.

Hoyer comes from a much bluer state than does Murtha, and Hoyer represents a much bluer district than does Murtha. Yet Murtha actually voted against some incarnations of the Patriot Act. Hoyer supported them all. Both voted in the minority of Dem congress people and supported the war powers act, yet Murtha later stood up against the war, at considerable political risk.

Also, if we want to neutralize the Repo wedge issues it makes more sense to have the 2 top leadership posts filled with Poleosi, an anti-gun pro-choice Dem with a Pro gun anti choice Dem. Lets face it, the Dems aren't going to restrict choice or take away peoples guns. So the impact is negligible yet the politics make more sense. And both Pelosi and Murtha oppose the war.

Add to that the ability of the leadership to actually work together and to me the decision is a no brainer.

Murtha.


PS, when you characterize someone's argument as blah blah it makes you look like a jerk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
11. Especially Murtha
NOBODY admitted to any negative feelings a few months back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
13. I used to like James Carville.
But the way he's bashing Howard Dean again and again within a week has lowered my opinion of him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
17. Not true at all! Carville and Paul Begala have been catching flak in DU
from the progressive wing ever since they denounced Cynthia McKinney for saying that Bush had been briefed about a bin Laden attack on America before 9/11, and did nothing to prevent it.

Murtha was applauded by DU's progressive wing when he said the war in Iraq was lost and it was time to bring the troops home.

No one is going to cheer Murtha for his anti-LGBT views.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC