O'lielly:"For the record, Fox Broadcasting has nothing to do with the Fox News Channel"

[dajoki]

Radar
http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/2006/11/bill-oreilly-quite-naturally-got.php

THE IDIOT BOX

O'Reilly Tries to Loofah Away Fox Stench

Bill O'Reilly got his falafels in a bunch last night over news that O.J. Simpson will explain precisely how he didn't-but-might butcher his ex-wife and her friend—on a Fox prime-time special. Said the frequently flabbergasted superpundit:
"Here's a man many believe did kill those two Americans, Nicole Brown Simpson being mother of his two children. Yet Simpson is participating in a project that is exploiting the murders. Shamefully, the Fox Broadcasting Unit is set to carry the program, which is simply indefensible, and a low point in American culture. For the record, Fox Broadcasting has nothing to do with the Fox News Channel."

O' really? That last part must have come as shocking news to O'Reilly's boss, Fox News Channel chief Roger Ailes, who also chairs Fox Television Stations, the group behind the forthcoming "low point in American culture." The shared "Fox" moniker is no coincidence, either. Fox Broadcasting and the Fox News Channel are both owned by Australian overlord and News Corp. founder and chief Rupert Murdoch. And the Fox Broadcasting Corporation—the people who program prime time for the Fox network—regularly air Fox News-produced programming, from coverage of presidential speeches to O'Reilly's special "documentaries" about people who hate children and Jesus.

<<snip>>

Radar contacted spokespeople for both Fox News Channel and Fox Television Stations via e-mail for comment. Conveniently they were the same person: Brian Lewis, who said, "Roger has absolutely nothing to do with the programs Fox Broadcasting Corporation broadcasts"—on the television stations for which Ailes is ultimately responsible.

HarperCollins, the publishing house that is paying Simpson a reported $3.5 million for the book in which he fully fleshes out his all-too-real murder scenario, is also owned by Murdoch's News Corp. While O'Reilly excoriated Simpson's publisher and brainstormed legal options against it with guest litigator Sunny Hostin—she said she would seek to freeze HarperCollins's assets if she were representing Goldman's family—he never mentioned it by name, or pointed out that it's also owned by the people who cut his paychecks.

Surely, Judith Regan, who will be conducting the interview with O.J. and whose imprint at HarperCollins is publishing the Simpson book, has nothing to do with Fox News Channel, though. Just ask Fox News bloviator Sean Hannity, whose books Regan publishes. Or Roger Ailes himself, who once gave Regan a show—Judith Regan Tonight—on the Fox News Channel.

[upi402]

1. liar liar liar n/t

[dajoki]

5. And a big Sissy!!

[catzies]

2. What about this angle though - Rupert may be distancing himself from his employees

This is a riveting read:


http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/061016fa_fact1

[TheCowsCameHome]

3. Breaking News -THEY BOTH SUCK. Details at 11:00

[Erika]

4. The Faux news roundtable brought up that NewsCorps

owns both Faux News and Faux Broadcasting, and HarperCollins. O'lielly is just that, a liar.

Roger Ailes is a scumbag as are his productions and companies.

[TheCowsCameHome]

6. Birds of a feather............

[Buzz Clik]

7. O'Reilly makes an error? Stunning.

[lordsummerisle]

8. I think the whole thing is being carefully orchestrated...

have O'Reilly be indignant about the issue to create even more interest so more people will watch and buy, which is really all it's about...

[dajoki]

13. Yes, all this talk is good promotion n/t

[Straight Shooter]

9. What an incestuous little circle of money-grubbing deviants. n/t

[ShrewdLiberal]

10. Right. And my mother and father aren't my mother and father.

Seems O'Lielly doesn't believe in relations.

[Sparkly]

11. For the record, Bill O'Reilly has nothing to do with journalism. nt

[Joe Bacon]

12. Are you sure this isn't a story that would be in THE ONION?

It sure sounds like ONION material to me!