|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
kerrygoddess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 03:56 AM Original message |
Kerry Was On To Something and the Big Three Automakers Get It |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hekate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 05:15 AM Response to Original message |
1. That sounds like a version of *my* plan! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpwhite (178 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 05:28 AM Response to Original message |
2. Kerry does have good ideas.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
global1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 06:40 AM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Kerry Is Not A Good Enough Speaker? And Your Comparing Him To Who?..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
_dynamicdems (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 09:06 AM Response to Reply #5 |
9. Hehe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
INdemo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 09:30 AM Response to Reply #2 |
10. John Kerry just happens to be the best speaker or campaigner of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clarkie1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 05:38 PM Response to Reply #10 |
15. delete. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zann725 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-25-06 01:46 AM Response to Reply #10 |
18. Totally agreed...on all points. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
notundecided (86 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-29-06 03:01 PM Response to Reply #10 |
43. Kerry will be back |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 01:15 PM Response to Reply #2 |
13. Right - because NO OTHER Democrat will have 3 lines out of their 1000s of speeches |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old and In the Way (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-25-06 12:36 AM Response to Reply #2 |
17. "He is not a good enough speaker to run for President." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberal N proud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 05:46 AM Response to Original message |
3. America will not be able to compete in the world until there is universal health care for ALL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sherman A1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 06:06 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Agreed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lildreamer316 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 08:02 AM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Isn't it ironic? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kerrygoddess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 12:46 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. Maybe our corporations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FormerDittoHead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 08:41 AM Response to Reply #3 |
8. Yes, how is this "reinsurance" NOT welfare for the insurance companies??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vincardog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 01:06 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. Bingo right in one. Universal is the only way to go, and taking OUT the profits that are skimmed out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChairmanAgnostic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 11:39 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. ban all drug ads. prescription and OTC. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elehhhhna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 01:51 PM Response to Reply #8 |
14. They already place this stuff with reinsureres. WE NEED SINGLE PAYER. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-25-06 01:50 AM Response to Reply #8 |
19. Reduced rates is part of the package |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FormerDittoHead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-25-06 09:58 AM Response to Reply #19 |
22. I do agree that single payer will probably not be achieved in one step |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FormerDittoHead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-25-06 08:29 PM Response to Reply #19 |
27. Follow up to my follow up... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-25-06 04:33 PM Response to Reply #8 |
23. The point is that with catastopic insurance handled by the government, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FormerDittoHead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-25-06 08:26 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. Apples and oranges and competition ISN'T WORKING. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-26-06 08:56 PM Response to Reply #26 |
29. This is extremely different than the bankrupcy bill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FormerDittoHead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-26-06 11:38 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. I agree that a step in the right direction is a good one, HOWEVER... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w4rma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-24-06 08:20 AM Response to Original message |
7. This is very good. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Morereason (496 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-25-06 03:21 AM Response to Original message |
20. I would take it one step further |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nolabels (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-27-06 09:11 AM Response to Reply #20 |
31. I would take it much further |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eridani (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-25-06 05:22 AM Response to Original message |
21. Bad idea, really bad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-25-06 04:37 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. having the government handle the catastrophic costs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eridani (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-26-06 02:41 AM Response to Reply #24 |
28. Why then should private insurers be allowed to continue to-- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MH1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-27-06 03:24 PM Response to Reply #28 |
32. Read it closer, the govt is not taking on ALL the risk. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eridani (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-28-06 01:58 AM Response to Reply #32 |
36. But the whole purpose of private insurance is to eliminate sick people-- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MH1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-28-06 09:42 AM Response to Reply #36 |
37. How can we continue? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eridani (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-28-06 09:24 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. Looks like we're into the old incrementalism vs best practice discussion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MH1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-28-06 11:26 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. True, but I think incrementalism is how you help people in reality. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eridani (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-29-06 03:53 AM Response to Reply #39 |
40. We will never have those choices-- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
williesgirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-25-06 05:07 PM Response to Original message |
25. Bad idea. Bail out for insurance cos. Just like when they got off the hook w/medicare long ago. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MH1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-27-06 03:25 PM Response to Reply #25 |
33. Are you saying that medicare is a bad idea too? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proudmoddemo (288 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-27-06 03:42 PM Response to Original message |
34. It's even scarier |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MH1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-27-06 04:16 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. Welcome to DU! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sendero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-29-06 07:19 AM Response to Original message |
41. Oh I see... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-29-06 09:23 AM Response to Reply #41 |
42. No, it has to do with the concept of risk |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:32 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC