Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Meet Senator Millionaire (Wealth in the Senate)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-25-06 01:34 AM
Original message
Meet Senator Millionaire (Wealth in the Senate)
http://biz.yahoo.com/weekend/senator_1.html

<snip>

Bob Corker, senator-elect from Tennessee, boasts an estimated $64 million to $236 million fortune, according to the financial disclosure he filed to the Senate. Claire McCaskill, the senator-to-be from Missouri, has a portfolio worth roughly $13 million to $29 million.

<snip>

Jim Webb, who ousted Senator George Allen of Virginia, is perhaps the splashiest millionaire of the bunch. After serving in the Reagan Pentagon, he penned six best-selling novels as well as the script for the film Rules of Engagement starring Samuel L. Jackson and Tommy Lee Jones.

Webb reported an estimated $2.3 million to $6.9 million in stocks and bonds. He also cited a $150,000 contract with Warner Brothers for an ongoing film project, with a $1 million option for screenwriting and $250,000 to produce the film.

Not all the freshmen senators have struck gold, however. Jon Tester, the flat-topped senator-elect from Montana, is as humble as his man-of-the-people image suggests.

He told The New York Times that he has earned barely $20,000 a year farming in the last decade. Aside from his ranch, which is valued at $600,000 to $1 million, he owns shares in just one stock, American Electric Power, and a stake in a bond fund. His securities portfolio is worth no more than $30,000 and as little as $2,000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-25-06 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. Bob Corker is hypocrite like Bush
i didn't know about this money situation. but Corker and the Republican party pretty much accused Ford of being some wealthy elitist who is out of touch. and trying to make himself look like some regular guy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-25-06 04:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. And if they are rich they must be smart. Right?
Like Bush and a few others we read about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-25-06 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
3. Or like in Corker's case crooked...
Edited on Sat Nov-25-06 08:27 AM by acmejack
But IOKIYAAR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmik debris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-25-06 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
4. $64 million to $236 million?????
That extreme margin of error makes this report NOT credible. If they cant even get within $100 million, they aren't very good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-25-06 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. The range is based on what the Senators report...
"It is difficult to pinpoint a senator's precise worth because they are required to disclose only the ranges of dollar values into which their assets fall, rather than an exact figure. Therefore, it's unclear for example whether Amy Klobuchar, Minnesota's senator-elect, is a millionaire: She reported assets of $325,000 and $1.4 million."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ninja Jordan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-25-06 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. Tester's my kind of guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-25-06 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. It generally takes a Senator about half the first term to "make some really
good investments" and make that first million. It is pervasive and has nothing to do with the letter after the name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-25-06 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. It is more pevasive than it should be
and it indicates stronger rules are needed and they need to be re-inforced.

The danger of people "buying congressmen" is there and the cost is far too high to our democracy. The problem is that it extends beyond the compromised people.

This was never shown in a starker way to me than when John Kerry fought to expose BCCI. Though Kerry was able to prove that it had facilitaed drug money laundering, had backed Pakistan's development of a nuclear bomb, in defiance of anti perfiliferation law, and had allowed global criminals to send money around the world covertly, he stood alone. He was called by people like Jimmy Carter and Jackie Onassis, two people who themselves were completely not involved, begging him to shut down the investigation because Democratic big wigs and money men were complicit and bought off. It was later found that OBL had millions in BCCI. Senator Kerry supposedly wore a bullet proof vest and clearly risked being a permanent outcast in the Democratic party, but he was right. It is beyond disturbing to me that such an evil organization could have so much power reaching into our federal government - and that no one, other than Senator Kerry, was willing to say it was wrong.

It does say that if you want someone who likely could not be bought by money. power or position - Senator Kerry may be the answer - clearly he is an honest man. (Note: he was NOT wealthy at that time.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-25-06 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Not only is our government for sale, but adding insult to injury,
they are astonishingly cheap. In general, an industry only has to spend a couple of million dollars to write and pass legislation that will net them billions. Any loan shark knows you should get at least 60% of the net.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC