Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tell me the one best thing about your '08 candidate (if you don't have one, feel free to ignore)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
More Than A Feeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 11:14 PM
Original message
Tell me the one best thing about your '08 candidate (if you don't have one, feel free to ignore)
Edited on Sun Nov-26-06 11:16 PM by Heaven and Earth
I want to get in on the ground floor of a campaign, and I live in Iowa, so I can work for whichever candidate I choose in the caucus. Each of the probable or proposed candidates for the Democratic nomination in '08 appears to have some good qualities, and some flaws. I want to know what it is about your particular choice that makes you willing to work like hell for him or her, rather than the others. I haven't decided who to support yet, so imagine that I might decide to support your candidate if you can get me to share your sentiment. Much obliged to all who reply.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. that means you will be able to meet them on your own
and decide from personal experience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. He's already won once in 2000
and he has shaken himself free of the DLC and Lieberman.
I am thinking Gore/Edwards in 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I hope.
Gore is one of my top choices if he runs but I'm waiting to see what his stance on trade issues is these days. Then I'll know if he's really cast off the corporate sponsors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 02:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. I'm definitely thinking Al Gore in 2008 . . . we need an environmentalist . . .
in the White House . . . if we don't stop destroying the planet, nothing else will matter much . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mentalsolstice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
4. He has intellect...
Edited on Mon Nov-27-06 01:04 AM by mentalsolstice
I may not always agree with his positions, but I'll know that he has more information than I, and that his decisions are well-thought out.

After the last six years, I crave intelligence, a broad, progressive world-view, and TRUE compassion. That's not so much to ask for in a leader, is it?

Like a good significant relationship or marriage...it really comes down to trust!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
5. Hillary will field a team that can fix America. The Clintons give good government.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 01:34 AM
Response to Original message
6. Damn, just one thing? That's hard! well I'll try, but you know how I am.....
Wes Clark knows what's up in the Pentagon....and since the pentagon has belonged to the Republicans since Vietnam (Prez. Clinton even had a Republican Sec. of Defense and Joint Chief of Staff to combat his "draftdodger" label), his presidency would change the entire landscape of the prioritizing of our Government Budget.

What would happen if someone that knew the inside outs of the porkmoney making machine was head honcho calling the shots? Got programs for the poor needing funding without raising taxes? Elect Wes.

Plus, Clark won't have to grandstand and try to appear like the big guy if Iran or North Korea attempts to confront him. He won't have to "Prove" he's tough, he'll just prove exactly how much of a Democrat he is to those who ever doubted him. He won't have to run to a bunch of advisor on foreign policy and be at their mercy.

A man who has served and almost died doing it, and still went on to continue serving his country. We are talking not about just any soldier or General...we are talking about the most decorated officer since Eisenhower! We're talking Duty, Honor and Country!

The media didn't make him, and therefore, they can't break him.

He's not a politician and therefore ain't gonna crack and push some dumb shit just because somebody said Boo!

Plus, He'll know how to put humpty dumpty back together again at mach3 speed. That would be the Rhodes Scholar in him. :)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 02:35 AM
Response to Original message
7. He has the rare gift, found in few politicians, of being able to set peoples' hearts afire. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
More Than A Feeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. and who is that? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Donning my flame suit, that is Barack Obama. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
More Than A Feeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. No flames here.
I am in the midst of reading Obama's book. It seems as though he understands and acknowledges the facts that are familiar to the netroots, but then he comes to a different conclusion. I don't know if I classify that as legitimate hope or wishful thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nickshepDEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. Well, you can put the SOB'in flame suit away. Obama is a top tier candidate.
Edited on Mon Nov-27-06 09:30 PM by nickshepDEM
#2 in just about ever national poll conducted. The guy is a rock star, period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
9. I'm not even sure who is running at this point.
I'll give you 2:

Choice #1, who has not expressed any interest in running this time: energy, integrity, consistently progressive, likes to actually work on issues, is not owned by corporations, and his take on the issues generally leaves everyone else in the dust.

Choice #2: Experience is key. I don't agree with all of his positions on issues, and a couple give me cause for concern. Still, he had my vote in 2000 and will have it again, if no one else steps to the plate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
More Than A Feeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Is choice #1 Brian Schweitzer? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. No, but he's on my list of "interest!"
#1 is Dennis Kucinich.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jai4WKC08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
13. Fights for what he believes in
I had to give this one some thought, because there are so many qualities I could write about.

But I think if I have to narrow it down to the ONE reason I support Clark so unreservedly is because I know I can always count on him to stand up and fight for what's right, no matter how great a personal, professional, or financial risk it might pose. He has demonstrated so many times a level of courage that few people possess. He is completely dedicated to the good of this country and our people, and the people of the world too; no one else I've seen has the sheer tireless capacity, or maybe it's willingness, to work on our behalf. And he takes no shit from those who push him too far, or try to manipulate him, or divide him from other Democrats on our core values. He knows how to push back (or smack down) and is willing to do it. We have suffered so much from spineless Democratic leadership, and Clark is one who has led the charge back from that abyss by showing how it's done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
14. He will be the first to RESPECT voters and tell them the truth by opening the books
because NO MATTER how well some of us THINK Clinton did as president, it was 8 WASTED YEARS because Bush2 overturned or dismantled or destroyed almost everything good that was done.

Clinton should never have covered up for Bush1 in the first place - because that is what gave us Bush2, 9-11 and the Iraq war.

I never want another Coverup Democratic administration ever again. The price is WAY too high, for this country and the world.

Democrats, the Truth Still Matters!
By Robert Parry
(First Posted May 11, 2006)

Editor's Note: With the Democratic victories in the House and Senate, there is finally the opportunity to demand answers from the Bush administration about important questions, ranging from Dick Cheney's secret energy policies to George W. Bush's Iraq War deceptions. But the Democrats are sure to be tempted to put the goal of "bipartisanship" ahead of the imperative for truth.

Democrats, being Democrats, always want to put governance, such as enacting legislation and building coalitions, ahead of oversight, which often involves confrontation and hard feelings. Democrats have a difficult time understanding why facts about past events matter when there are problems in the present and challenges in the future.

Given that proclivity, we are re-posting a story from last May that examined why President Bill Clinton and the last Democratic congressional majority (in 1993-94) shied away from a fight over key historical scandals from the Reagan-Bush-I years -- and the high price the Democrats paid for that decision:

My book, Secrecy & Privilege, opens with a scene in spring 1994 when a guest at a White House social event asks Bill Clinton why his administration didn’t pursue unresolved scandals from the Reagan-Bush era, such as the Iraqgate secret support for Saddam Hussein’s government and clandestine arms shipments to Iran.

Clinton responds to the questions from the guest, documentary filmmaker Stuart Sender, by saying, in effect, that those historical questions had to take a back seat to Clinton’s domestic agenda and his desire for greater bipartisanship with the Republicans.

Clinton “didn’t feel that it was a good idea to pursue these investigations because he was going to have to work with these people,” Sender told me in an interview. “He was going to try to work with these guys, compromise, build working relationships.”

Clinton’s relatively low regard for the value of truth and accountability is relevant again today because other centrist Democrats are urging their party to give George W. Bush’s administration a similar pass if the Democrats win one or both houses of Congress.

Reporting about a booklet issued by the Progressive Policy Institute, a think tank of the Democratic Leadership Council, the Washington Post wrote, “these centrist Democrats … warned against calls to launch investigations into past administration decisions if Democrats gain control of the House or Senate in the November elections.”

These Democrats also called on the party to reject its “non-interventionist left” wing, which opposed the Iraq War and which wants Bush held accountable for the deceptions that surrounded it.

“Many of us are disturbed by the calls for investigations or even impeachment as the defining vision for our party for what we would do if we get back into office,” said pollster Jeremy Rosner, calling such an approach backward-looking.

Yet, before Democrats endorse the DLC’s don’t-look-back advice, they might want to examine the consequences of Clinton’s decision in 1993-94 to help the Republicans sweep the Reagan-Bush scandals under the rug. Most of what Clinton hoped for – bipartisanship and support for his domestic policies – never materialized.

‘Politicized’ CIA

After winning Election 1992, Clinton also rebuffed appeals from members of the U.S. intelligence community to reverse the Reagan-Bush “politicization” of the CIA’s analytical division by rebuilding the ethos of objective analysis even when it goes against a President’s desires.

Instead, in another accommodating gesture, Clinton gave the CIA director’s job to right-wing Democrat, James Woolsey, who had close ties to the Reagan-Bush administration and especially to its neoconservatives.

One senior Democrat told me Clinton picked Woolsey as a reward to the neocon-leaning editors of the New Republic for backing Clinton in Election 1992.

“I told that the New Republic hadn’t brought them enough votes to win a single precinct,” the senior Democrat said. “But they kept saying that they owed this to the editors of the New Republic.”

During his tenure at the CIA, Woolsey did next to nothing to address the CIA’s “politicization” issue, intelligence analysts said. Woolsey also never gained Clinton’s confidence and – after several CIA scandals – was out of the job by January 1995.

At the time of that White House chat with Stuart Sender, Clinton thought that his see-no-evil approach toward the Reagan-Bush era would give him an edge in fulfilling his campaign promise to “focus like a laser beam” on the economy.

He was taking on other major domestic challenges, too, like cutting the federal deficit and pushing a national health insurance plan developed by First Lady Hillary Clinton.

So for Clinton, learning the truth about controversial deals between the Reagan-Bush crowd and the autocratic governments of Iraq and Iran just wasn’t on the White House radar screen. Clinton also wanted to grant President George H.W. Bush a gracious exit.

“I wanted the country to be more united, not more divided,” Clinton explained in his 2004 memoir, My Life. “President Bush had given decades of service to our country, and I thought we should allow him to retire in peace, leaving the (Iran-Contra) matter between him and his conscience.”

Unexpected Results

Clinton’s generosity to George H.W. Bush and the Republicans, of course, didn’t turn out as he had hoped. Instead of bipartisanship and reciprocity, he was confronted with eight years of unrelenting GOP hostility, attacks on both his programs and his personal reputation.

Later, as tensions grew in the Middle East, the American people and even U.S. policymakers were flying partially blind, denied anything close to the full truth about the history of clandestine relationships between the Reagan-Bush team and hostile nations in the Middle East.

Clinton’s failure to expose that real history also led indirectly to the restoration of Bush Family control of the White House in 2001. Despite George W. Bush’s inexperience as a national leader, he drew support from many Americans who remembered his father’s presidency fondly.

If the full story of George H.W. Bush’s role in secret deals with Iraq and Iran had ever been made public, the Bush Family’s reputation would have been damaged to such a degree that George W. Bush’s candidacy would not have been conceivable.

Not only did Clinton inadvertently clear the way for the Bush restoration, but the Right’s political ascendancy wiped away much of the Clinton legacy, including a balanced federal budget and progress on income inequality. A poorly informed American public also was easily misled on what to do about U.S. relations with Iraq and Iran.

In retrospect, Clinton’s tolerance of Reagan-Bush cover-ups was a lose-lose-lose – the public was denied information it needed to understand dangerous complexities in the Middle East, George W. Bush built his presidential ambitions on the nation’s fuzzy memories of his dad, and Republicans got to enact a conservative agenda.

Clinton’s approach also reflected a lack of appreciation for the importance of truth in a democratic Republic. If the American people are expected to do their part in making sure democracy works, they need to be given at least a chance of being an informed electorate.

Yet, Clinton – and now some pro-Iraq War Democrats – view truth as an expendable trade-off when measured against political tactics or government policies. In reality, accurate information about important events is the lifeblood of democracy.

Though sometimes the truth can hurt, Clinton and the Democrats should understand that covering up the truth can hurt even more. As Clinton’s folly with the Reagan-Bush scandals should have taught, the Democrats may hurt themselves worst of all when helping the Republicans cover up the truth.

Robert Parry broke many of the Iran-Contra stories in the 1980s for the Associated Press and Newsweek. His latest book, Secrecy & Privilege: Rise of the Bush Dynasty from Watergate to Iraq, can be ordered at secrecyandprivilege.com. It's also available at Amazon.com, as is his 1999 book, Lost History: Contras, Cocaine, the Press & 'Project Truth.'

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nickshepDEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
17. Dont have a candidate yet, but....
Edited on Mon Nov-27-06 09:24 PM by nickshepDEM
Barack Obama - Two words: Rock Star

John Edwards - I really like Edwards' sense of compassion and hope.

.
.
.
.

Mark Warner - He's out, I know, but the best thing about Warner was... he would have been an absolutely outstanding general election candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
19. Elizabeth ....
...the rest is just details :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
More Than A Feeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #19
26. Good to hear a voice for Edwards
I'm off to find the Bayh, Biden, Daschle, Dodd, Gravel, and "other" supporters. Every candidate needs someone to put in an appearance!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. We have great hopefuls don't we !
Good luck on your project. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
20. It's not about him.
It's about the people he works for in the Senate, and who he will work for as President. ALL of them. Which puts him in a bit of a bind at times with some of them. Still he sticks to principles - even though that may also mean impoliticly changing a position based on new information.

If (big if, imo, but go with me here) John Kerry comes to believe in his heart that the best thing for the country will be for him to back off and support a Hillary candidacy, the fact that she kicked the stool out from under him as Rove slipped a noose around his neck won't stop him from supporting her. If he believes it is best for the country. (Example: James Webb, who wouldn't shake his hand for years, and wrote a highly critical piece in early 2004 that presaged the swift liars. Yet Kerry came through for him in the 2006 campaign.)

Oh, and his values and positions pretty much align with mine, too, but it's what I said above that will make me work like hell for him.

The clincher: Kerry said about a year ago, during a speech, that other than love, the most important word in the American language is "citizen". That statement is so essentially Kerry - and so essentially me. If I hadn't already been hooked, that would probably have done it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clarkie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
21. This is the ONE thing that matters most...
Edited on Mon Nov-27-06 10:42 PM by Clarkie1
"Wes Clark is a man of whom you can ask a question, and he will look you directly in the eye, and give you the most truthful and complete answer you can imagine. You will know the absolute truth of the statement as well as the thought process behind the answer. You will have no doubt as to the intellect of the speaker and meaning of the answer to this question....So you can see, as a politician, he has a lot to learn." -Mario Cuomo



And this...this is all the rest:

You will determine whether rage or reason guides the United States in the struggle to come. You will choose whether we are known for revenge or compassion. You will choose whether we, too, will kill in the name of God, or whether in His name, we can find a higher civilization and a better means of settling our differences.
Commencement speech at Seton Hall University, May 13, 2002

We live in a liberal democracy.... You know, this country was founded on the principals of the Enlightenment.... It was the idea that people could talk, reason, have dialogue, discuss the issues. It wasn't founded on the idea that someone would get stuck by a divine inspiration and know everything right from wrong. I mean, people who founded this country had religion, they had strong beliefs, but they believed in reason, in dialogue, in civil discourse. We can’t lose that in this country. We've got to get it back.
interview with Bill Maher, 2003

But you don't have a chance if you can't find a job. I don't think it penetrates the minds of this Administration what it must be like for a factory worker to arrive home to his family with the news that he's been laid off. What it must be like not to know what the future holds for your children, because you don't know what the future holds for you. What it must be like to see the government take hundreds of billions of dollars that could be used to fund job training, unemployment benefits, or jobs programs - and instead to send that money off to people who have such staggering wealth that the new money won't make the tiniest improvement in their lifestyle. What it must be like to be told that tax cuts for the rich are necessary to create jobs for working people, and then to see jobs fall month after month for more than 30 months. If that doesn't break your heart, you don't have a heart.
Jobs Plan speech, September 24, 2003

Nothing could be a more serious violation of public trust than to consciously make a war based on false claims.
Conference of Military Reporters and Editors, October, 2003

Maybe it's because I've never been in politics, but I don't believe that America is run by politicians in Washington. I believe it's run by people like us, in places like this.
True Values Tour, January, 2004

The safety of our country demands an end to the doctrinaire, ineffective policies that currently grip Washington. Enough is enough! A safe America - a just America - that's what we want, that's what we need.
2004 Democratic Convention

G. Gordon Liddy says that Democrats haven't given the president enough credit. I think the president deserves full credit. In fact I think he should be held fully accountable.
Esquire, August, 2003

If Karl Rove is watching today, Karl, I want you to hear me loud and clear: I am going to provide tax cuts to ease the burdens for 31 million American families -- and lift hundreds of thousands of children out of poverty -- by raising the taxes on 0.1 percent of families -- those who make more than $1,000,000 a year. You don't have to read my lips, I'm saying it. And if that makes me an 'old-style' Democrat, then I accept that label with pride and I dare you to come after me for it.
Families First tax plan speech

When our airmen were flying over Kosovo, Tom Delay led the House Republicans to vote not to support their activities when American troops were in combat. To me, that's a real indicator of a man who's motivated not by patriotism or support for the troops, but for partisan political purposes.
interview with Wolf Blitzer, July, 2003

I believe in open, honest government, where we hold our leaders accountable.
We have to be the party that can stand toe-to-toe with George W. Bush on national security, as well as the party of compassion.
George W. Bush has helped those who have most, hurt those who have least and ignored everyone in between.
I am tired of being categorized as immoral and unpatriotic because I am a democrat and because I oppose this war. Why is liberal a bad word? It comes from the word liberty--a concept we used to cherish. Family values include loving and embracing all genders, sexual orientations, races, religions, physical and economic conditions, etc. As a Christian, and more specifically, a Catholic, that is my understanding of what Christ teaches. Battling for separation of church and state is one thing. Now, we also have to battle for the separation of church and hate. Family values and morals include making certain that a parent or parents can support their children, provide them with a home, food, education, medical care, etc.
And I am a patriot, despite opposing this war. We can't let the right tell us we are not because we question our leadership. It is my duty to question them. I do support the troops by questioning and opposing this war because, when I do, I help insure that they are sacrificing for a just cause worthy of their lives. When we don't, no one is there to protect them from the leadership putting them in harm's way for illegitimate reasons.
We'll still need our armed forces and we'll take every necessary action to make America safe - but we'll gain that safety not by force of arms, but by who we are and what we represent. For we should be an America not puffed up by pride in our own power, but rather an America humbled by the recognition of our common humanity. We must make sure that globalization helps people around the world, raising living standards and improving the environment everywhere - rather than leading a race to the bottom.
New Hampshire, January, 20, 2004

Imagine a world in which we saw beyond the lines that divide us, and celebrated our differences, instead of hiding from them. Imagine a world in which we finally recognized that, fundamentally, we are all the same. And imagine if we allowed that new understanding to build relations between people and between nations.
New Hampshire, January, 20, 2004

I'm pro-choice, pro-affirmative action, pro-environment and pro-labor. I was either going to be the loneliest Republican in America, or I was going to be a happy Democrat.

The American people will trust the Democratic Party to defend America when they believe that Democrats will defend other Democrats.
I've forgotten more about foreign policy that President Bush ever learned.

Well, last I checked, there was no 'if' in the 15th Amendment. One person one vote isn't just a slogan -- it's the highest law of this land. As president, I will not rest until every single American can cast their vote, and every single one of those votes is counted. We shouldn't have to wait for another Florida to fully fund election reform.
December 29, 2003

I'm not running to bash George Bush. A lot of Americans really love him. They love what he represents, a man who's overcome adversity in his life from alcoholism and pulled his marriage back together and--and moved forward. But I'm running because I think this country must have better leadership in moving forward.

I think we're at a time in American history that's probably analogous to, maybe, Rome before the first emperors, when the Republic started to fall... I think if you look at the pattern of events, if you look at the disputed election of 2000, can you imagine? In America, people are trying to recount ballots and a partisan mob is pounding on the glass and threatening the counters? Can you imagine that? Can you imagine a political party which does its best to keep any representatives from another party — who've even been affiliated with another party — from getting a business job in the nation's capital? Can you imagine a political party that wants to redistrict so that its opponents can be driven out entirely?...it's a different time in America and the Republic is - this election is about a lot more than jobs. I'm not sure everybody in America sees it right now. But I see it, I feel it.

Somebody once told me in business that when you're going to negotiate a business deal, you stake out your position and stand on it! Don't go in there and ask what they want. Say, "Here's what I want!" You've got a Republican Party under Gingrich and Tom DeLay that says, "Here's what I want." Then you've got the Democrats over here saying, "Yeah, ah, yeah, we could, some of what you say makes pretty good sense." The result is the American people don't see the full spectrum. Before the 2002 election there were a lot of Democratic politicians apparently who said, "I don't have the information. I can't battle with the president on the information. He's got the intelligence. What if there is a smoking gun in there? I can't fight the president in my congressional district." What we've got to do is stake out our position. For instance on tax reform, stop saying you agree with simplification of the tax code. … We stand for progressive taxation. We're proud of it. If you make more, you should pay more, period!

is probably the most intelligent officer I ever served with. great integrity, sound judgment and great kindness in dealing with people. He is a public servant of exceptional character and skill.
General Barry McCaffrey (ret.)

There are a lot of good Democrats in this race. But Wes Clark is the best Democrat. He is a true progressive. He's the Democrat's Democrat. I've been around the political block - and I can tell you, I know a true progressive when I see one. And that's why he has my vote.
Senator George McGovern, January 18, 2004

Wes Clark is a man of whom you can ask a question, and he will look you directly in the eye, and give you the most truthful and complete answer you can imagine. You will know the absolute truth of the statement as well as the thought process behind the answer. You will have no doubt as to the intellect of the speaker and meaning of the answer to this question....So you can see, as a politician, he has a lot to learn.
Mario Cuomo

I've never endorsed a presidential candidate before. But when I talk to General Clark, and when I listen to him, I can see him as a president for all Americans.
Dr. Mary Francis Berry, former chair of the United States Commission On Civil Rights

I've read his environmental statement. It's very good, and I agree with it. Clark's environmental position is spelled out very well and it hits the important points. He handles the tough questions better than anyone else.
Senator Gaylord Nelson

Wes Clark has the character and depth to be another Marshall or Eisenhower in time of war.
General Alexander M. Haig, Jr., July 19, 1978

He is unquestionably one in a million. A professional whose perceptions are correct, whose plans are thorough and complete, whose executions are artistic, and whose success is inevitable....I have never been more impressed with an officer's talent and dedication. He should rank with men like Douglas MacArthur, Maxwell Taylor, Creighton Abrams...
Colonel Charles G. Prather IV, June 23, 1977

As the friendly force maneuvered through the treacherous region, it was suddenly subjected to an intense small arms fire from a well-concealed insurgent element. Although painfully wounded in the initial volley, Captain Clark immediately directed his men on a counter-assault of the enemy positions. With complete disregard for his personal safety, Captain Clark remained with his unit until the reactionary force arrived and the situation was well-in-hand. His courageous initiative and exemplary professionalism significantly contributed to the successful outcome of the engagement. Captain Clark's unquestionable valor in close combat against a hostile force is in keeping with the finest traditions of the military service and reflects great credit upon himself, the 1st Infantry Division, and the United States Army.
From the Award of the Silver Star, as presented to Capt. Clark after he was wounded in battle in Vietnam, February 26, 1970

Wes Clark has been a superb battalion commander and will be a superb brigade commander. He is an officer of the rarest potential and will clearly rise to senior general officer rank. He will be one of the Army's leaders in the 1990's.
General Colin Powell, 1982

The mark of leadership is not to stand up when everybody is standing, but rather to actually stand up when no one else is standing.
Samantha Powers, Pulitzer-prize winner and human rights activist, on Clark's humanitarian stances, when endorsing Clark for President

The corporate scandals of the last two years have shown us that we need to bring a new standard of openness to government and to business. I believe Wes Clark will play it straight with the American people. The Bush administration has put the fox in charge of the hen house time and again, placing former industry advocates in charge of the very government organizations that should be policing them. We have seen the results of such cronyism: the average working American loses, the average retiree loses, the environment loses, the average investor loses. We need a leader who will stand up for our interests and not the special interests. I think Wes Clark is that leader.
Sherron Watkins, Time Magazine Person of the Year 2002, whistle-blower exposing Enron's corruption, endorsing Clark for President, Janurary 3, 2004

I asked a whole lot of my friends who were generals and colonels and majors, who served over General Clark and under General Clark and every last one of them said to me that this is a good man, and if he were leading our nation they would be proud. son of the South capable of making a dangerous world a safer place for everybody. A man we are going to make the next president of the United States.
Andrew Young, Civil Rights activist, accompanied Martin Luther King Jr. on day of MLKjr's assassination, first African-American ambassador to the UN

To those who say that Wes Clark has never held political office: anyone who can command NATO, and keep all those forces together, and win that war without losing one American life, knows what it means to hold political office.
Senator Tom Harkin of Iowa

http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Wesley_Clark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sampsonblk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
22. Gen Clark - Knows what he's talking about
He's been there and done it. The '08 election will still be about national security. There is no more credible candidate than Wes Clark, assuming he runs again.

In fact, the other candidates, especially Kerry, are pathetic on this most important subject.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
23. Al Gore is the most exceptional person in the country and perhaps
the world. He is truly a citizen of the world. It is mandatory that the next leader of our country lead in the fight to save this fragile planet. Al Gore is the one to begin to set things right. He helped negotiate the Kyoto Treaty and then our current (non)leadership refused to sign on. Please read or re-read Earth in the Balance and you will know the desperation we face. I will back any democrat that the majority fields. We and the world cannot afford another Republican regime. It is a must that we all work together to see that this does not occur.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jen4clark Donating Member (812 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
24. One best thing
I'd have to say is the inspiration and hope that I get from General Clark. Oh, that's two things. Okay, inspiration -- to keep fighting.

I haven't felt that from any leader in my lifetime. I was a little young for JFK and RFK -- only 13 when RFK was assassinated. In fact I was pretty much convinced politics was a game for the elite and I refused to play their game. Then, when the SCOTUS handed the presidency to Jr. in 2000 I knew I couldn't just sit on the sidelines anymore. In 2003 I heard Michael Moore speak and he was talking about this General guy. I was pretty sure I wouldn't be supporting a General but once I started reading about Clark -- then joined the Santa Cruz for Clark group -- I knew. I've never looked back, and in fact the more I learned, the more motivated and inspired I became.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zann725 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
25. Kerry - "speaks Truth to Authority" with Integrity.
Since he did NOT really lose in '04, I STILL consider him a viable candidate...NOT a 'loser.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donna Zen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
27. March of Folly
In Barbara Tuchman's book, The March of Folly, she writes about times when incredibly misguided people lead the people into obvious in retrospect a world of Folly. That is where we are today. Anyone with common sense knew where bush was leading us, and they opposed him from the very beginning.

Tuchman also talks about true and good leaders which she says are extremely rare. These people possess two main qualities: courage and common sense.

I believe that we have reached a terrible low in our world, and turning it around will take a great leader. That is Wes Clark. We are very lucky to have someone with his skills, temperament, courage and common sense among us. I don't doubt that the scene is blurred by propaganda, a corrupt press, and the corrosive effects of money; therefore, I'm not heartened to believe that you, or America will understand that we are being offered a chance to save ourselves.

His credentials are vast to the point that he can dust the field. An environmentalist whose early years were spent as an outstanding math and physics student. An internationalist who remains one of the few Americans trusted by the moderate Arab world. A diplomat who has demonstrated his skills. An Oxford economist who is using his skills to promote emerging technologies in medicine and energy.

I'm willing to work for Wes Clark, because I'm know that it is exactly the right thing to do...for me, for you, and for my kid. We are very lucky to be given this chance. Looking at the political landscape, it may be a long hard slog if we don't accept this gift.

Good luck with your search.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
More Than A Feeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Thanks!
I love all the passion on this thread from all the candidate supporters!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clarkie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 02:37 AM
Response to Original message
29. Any Biden supporters? Warner? Bayh? Others? Clinton? kicked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
31. kicking
good thread, I'd like to hear from the supporters of all potential candidates, and isn't it nice that there's no bickering!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC