Your statement that Arizona had "clean elections" utterly ignores some glaring problems.
Post-Election Audit a Farce in ArizonaNovember 16th, 2006
by Michael Shelby
The post-election audit law in Arizona to manually count 2 percent of the precincts was a farce.
Perhaps I was too optimistic. Perhaps I wanted to believe we had made some progress. Even after I observed transfer of data between electronic tabulating machines by “thumb drives” at our Maricopa County Elections Department, when I saw that there was no security applied to the custody of the thumb drives before, during, or after the vote counting, I showed up for the post-election audit skeptical but hopeful. Despite the rigid, nonsensical, arbitrary requirement that a quorum of 72 auditors from each major party must participate or the audit could not be performed, and even though I knew that almost every conceivable obstacle to conducting a post-election audit of the electronic voting machines was inserted into Arizona’s Election Reform Bill by obstructionists to election accountability; I thought that just maybe, this time, we might have a go at accountability. Sadly, it was not to be.
http://blog.pdamerica.org/?p=908 The new voter ID pushed so hard by our repub SoS, disenfranchised Native American voters.
"Navajo Nation – where there are 40,000 registered Democrats, voters favored Sen. Kerry with around 79 percent of the votes. Analysis of other reservation precincts showed that George Bush received anywhere from 19 to 34 percent."
"150,000 American Indian voters in Arizona, the Native Vote would make the difference." (22 tribes, nations and communities) Native Americans tend Dem.
"Many Indian people, especially elders, don’t have birth certificates, driver’s licenses or two forms of Tribal identification."
"However, the special regulations do not resolve the problems of identification and proof of citizenship as Tribal identification documents are different, contain different information such as some not having a photograph, others may, and some Tribes not having a Tribal identification card at all."
"The other forms of acceptable identification are also impediments. Indian citizens living on reservations may not have phone services, so there would not be a phone bill, may not have utility bills and will not have a property tax notification."
Native American voters who have participated in elections for many years may be rejected at the polls because of lack of proper ID.
"With their increased political participation, Native Americans have become an increasingly powerful voting bloc. In 2002, the Indian vote helped retain ...the Arizona gubernatorial seat for Janet Napolitano (Dem)."
"Many Indians do not have federal or state government IDs-some due to the historical concerns, some due to cultural issues, and others because they have not previously had a need for one."
"Rep. Rick Renzi, R-Ariz.... only received 8 percent of the Navajo vote in 2002"
Disenfranchisement of Native American voters, intimidation and disenfranchisement of Latino voters and obstructing legitimate random auditing and recount are not indicative of "clean elections" to me.