Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

My response to a pro-Iraq war veteran

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
lwcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 07:27 AM
Original message
My response to a pro-Iraq war veteran
Edited on Wed Nov-29-06 07:37 AM by lwcon
Whether you're with Bush and his Iraq war or agin' him, you're going to talk a lot about the troops — whether supporting them means keeping them in Iraq or getting them home.

When a veteran joins the debate — in favor of a war that even Henry Kissinger admits is unwinnable, and which Bush admits is unconnected with the homeland attack he's avidly conflated it with — the discussion takes on a new dimension.

To paraphrase John Kerry: "How do you tell a man he's been fighting for a mistake?"

On Martian Anthropologist, where I guest-blog, I encountered Jamie, who says he was in Iraq "from Thanksgiving '04 to November of '05 with the 1-128 INF BN."

Jamie's comments include:

I'm sick of whinos. Sick of you who refuse to forget about Bush for a minute and look at a map. Sick of those of you who say "Boo-hoo! We don't want to see our Sons and Daughters dying in a foreign country. Boo Hoo!"


Below is what I wrote back...


Jamie,

Obviously, we're in the anonymous world of the Internet, but assuming that you are, indeed, a veteran of the Iraq war, I truly thank you for your service and salute you for your courage.

I hope you understand that people who are against the war are not in any way "against our troops." We're against bad foreign policy and against sending our young men and women into harm's way when it's unnecessary, or even counterproductive, to our national security interests.

I understand that's an awfully unwelcome message to someone who's risked life and limb in Iraq. But that doesn't change the stakes — or the logic — of the U.S. being there.

As a participant in this American democracy, I have four reasons why I "whine" about George W. Bush's Iraq war:

1. By all indications, the war was unnecessary
a. Before the war started, Iraq was a hemmed-in secular dictatorship with little terrorist activity
b. The most recent UN resolution had achieved unprecedented access to sites and scientists of concern, and there were no reliable indications of WMD
c. Bush and Blair famously "sexed up" known false and unreliable information, because facts-be-damned, they wanted this war. There is extensive evidence of this, including the Downing Street Memo, the decision to publicize known false information about aluminum tubes and yellowcake purchases, and the absurd compensation given to convicted felon Ahmed Chalabi to fabricate tales that fit the neo-cons' agenda.
d. It will go down as one of history's greatest moments of hubris, to think you could bomb a country into happily adopting your way of life

2. The war is incredibly costly
a. When nearly 3,000 Americans and hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians of another country are needlessly killed in battle, I have many reactions. But "boo hoo" isn't one of them.
b. Estimates of the total financial cost run into the trillions

3. The war has made us less safe. In addition to the nearly 50,000 US casualties (including wounded), the war has:
a. Made Iraq into a hotbed of terrorism, and — per the National Intelligence Estimate — a veritable recruiting poster for anti-Western terrorists
b. Made the United States a pariah nation with few real allies. Allies matter — remember World War II?
c. Emboldened our enemies. Blundering in to attack a country on false or incorrect pretenses makes us look reckless and foolish. It certainly gives the message to a North Korea or an Iran that America is prepared to preemptively strike on a whim, which may justify — in their eyes — horrific preemptive action of their own. Yes, it's quite the rage to pretend that things like diplomacy don't matter, that you can pretend to be an omnipotent Texas sheriff who dares the enemy to "bring it on," and that's simply pathetic and self-destructive bluster. Even Bush, who will gnaw his own paw off rather than admit a mistake, has lived to regret saying that, and he now claims to have discovered the idea of negotiating with North Korea and Iran. Not that I expect he will do it successfully, if at all, but the insane machismo of the Rush Limbaughs does not represent a rational or successful international policy.

4. Soon, my son will be of draft age. Having lived through the quagmire that was Vietnam, I know full well how a "managed conflict" can metastasize into a draft call. I'll be damned if I want my son to be a name on some fucking wall of young men and women who died for no fucking reason.

Re:

You complain about innocent lives lost? How many do you think will be lost when we leave the country before they are ready? Don't try to pretend you care unless you are willing to stand next to them and say "Don't worry, I'll keep you safe tonight."

I'm sick of people who point out mistakes and problems (yes, I concede that mistakes have been made), but offer no alternative other than to leave. It's easy to sit here and whine, but, just because you have the right, doesn't mean you should.


Well, I'm sick of a government, a news media, and an unquestioning public that allowed those obvious mistakes to happen, and who practically bashed your head in if you stood up against the war back when it could have been prevented.

Sure it's easy to whine. Unfortunately, it's also to easy tell people to shut up and support a President who is corrupt and incompetent and running an absolutely disastrous war policy. It does not honor our troops, our forefathers, our children, the victims of 9/11, nor our unique place in the world to go fight a war that didn't need to be fought, and to willfully ignore all detailed planning, in favor of the juvenile fantasies of the Project for a New American Century neo-cons, who promised us chocolates and flowers, a self-funding war, and a Norman Rockwell Iraq that would be a model for the Middle East.

Unfortunately, it's not easy — and maybe not even possible — to have any outcome of this that isn't an unmitigated disaster. And that's a terrible shame, whether you were for this war or not.

Sorry I don't have an easy answer for what you do after you open Pandora's Box (the term our Ambassador to Iraq has used on multiple occasions). But it makes good sense to impeach the idiot who went and opened it and to get the hell away from there as fast as you can.


(edited to fix paragraph spacing)
___

Hey, the liberal light is always on at the Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy. Please stop by and say "hi!"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. We should never have gone in in the first place
something gungho guys fail to take into account. And, everyday we stay is just compounding the felony so to speak. Three years later and I can truly say the mess is nobody's fault but bush's. Jamie needs a little more soul searching.

I wonder if Edison, Einstein, DaVinci, Gates etc ever got "sick and tired" when people pointed out mistakes. When one accepts that mistakes have been made they adapt, improvise, improve, overcome, but no, not mr stay the course bush. Jamie needs a little more soul searching. (Almost a song title huh?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. Remember when Repukes claimed that Paul Hackett only
sat in his office in a cushy safe job during this war of choice?

And they call us "anti-troops" ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
luckyleftyme2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. FOR EVERY POSITIVE VETERAN

FOR EVERY POSITIVE VETERAN THEIR ARE HUNDREDS WHO DISAGREE WITH THIS FARCE.
THE FACT IS BECAUSE OF THIS WAR BETWEEN 500,000-800,000 PEOPLE ON BOTH SIDES AND THEIR INOCCENT VICTIMS WILL NOT HUG THEIT LOVED ONES AGAIN!
AFTER IMPEACHMENT I THINK BLAIR AND BUSH SHOULD STAND TRAIL FOR WAR CRIMES! AND I KNOW I'M IN THE MAJORITY ON THIS ONE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Pssst-your cap lock key is on.
But other than th eshouting I agree with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
4. And that's what happens when a President doesn't spend time STUDYING the nation
Edited on Wed Nov-29-06 08:09 AM by blm
and its history, its culture, its religions, and whether or not they are a serious threat to our national security before he makes the decision to invade it.

Your response was very well stated, and you closed it with flourish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lwcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Thanks BLM
I used to believe that we'd learned a lesson after Vietnam, so in some way those tens of thousands of American soldiers didn't die in vain. But the neo-cons and Swift Boaters rewrote history, and it seems that nothing has been learned at all.

___

Hey, the liberal light is always on at the Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy. Please stop by and say "hi!"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. They get to rewrite history because they bought control of most of the media
that was supposed to belong to the people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lwcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I don't even think they had to buy all the media
To a large extent, the MSM went willingly, enjoying the photo-ops with smilin' Ronnie, and dismissing the Mike Dukakises for not looking butch enough in a tank.

They propped up the Boy King because a swaggering faux-Texan twit is more fun than statesmen who tend to the sober tasks of governance.

___

Hey, the liberal light is always on at the Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy. Please stop by and say "hi!"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
5. It really fries me when pro-war supporters use this line of reasoning
Every time you try to have a conversation about the issues surrounding Iraq, why we went in, the evidence or non evidence of WMD, whether we should get out and when and how -- their only goal is to shut down the discussion, any discussion.

Every time they successfully shut down debate, they just continue doing what they have always done. In this election, the American people said enough with the same old, same old. It is time to do something new. And before we decide on what that right something new is -- we need to -- guess what DEBATE!

The pro-war folks are wrong, they have been wrong and will always be wrong -- until we start dealing with the actual facts of the situation, instead of slogans and macho statements, we can't figure a way out. The problem is the pro-war folks have REALLY REALLY REALLY messed it up good -- so there are no easy buttons, no quick fixes. But to say that the folks that caused the mess should be allowed to continue handling and managing the mess is just utterly ridiculous. Yeah, it is hard to figure a path forward -- but that is not OUR fault -- it is hard because the pro-war folks refused to listen to any other voice.


This guy says "You complain about innocent lives lost? How many do you think will be lost when we leave the country before they are ready?" My answer is -- you are darn right that lives will be lost -- but whose fault is that? Are you saying we are essentially trapped in Iraq - we shouldn't stay, but we cannot leave? Given the record of "success" thus far, don't you think some new voices can add to the debate?

This guy then says "I'm sick of people who point out mistakes and problems (yes, I concede that mistakes have been made), but offer no alternative other than to leave." My response -- you know, when I hear that, I think, sounds great, very macho. Unfortunately, it is not true. So, I ask myself, is this guy just lying or is he really not listening. In fact, lots of people have offered lots of ideas, including - but not limited to - leaving. Have we really considered our mistakes, conceded mistakes. I don't think so. But let's but that aside, because this is not a high school or back alley debate. These are people's lives - Americans, Iraqis, our children's economic future. Let's have a serious discussion and not use these emotionally charged absolute - "no alternative other than to leave" crap.

And then the ultimate statement: "It's easy to sit here and whine, but, just because you have the right, doesn't mean you should."

My response -- frankly, it is not easy at all. Actually, it is utterly excruciating to have yelled at the top of your lungs for years that this was a mistake -- that there was no evidence of WMD from the get go, and we shouldn't have gone to Iraq. I don't feel it is a right, I feel it is an obligation as an American to speak up and say - that is wrong, this is wrong, enough.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lwcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Well said, Justice! n/t

___

Hey, the liberal light is always on at the Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy. Please stop by and say "hi!"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
7. Great response!
You keep your cool & present a well reasoned reply. I tend to get pissed off a be a fool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dyedinthewoolliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
10. As the guys called it in Vietnam,
I've never known anyone who was in 'the shit' to EVER talk about it. Ever. No matter what war they were in.If he was there, I'm thinking Green Zone. As for alternatives to leaving, the question must be asked, how did we get here? What was happening here before our arrival? I cannot figure out the reasoning of those who think we can somehow patch things up and have life restored to 'normal'. There is no 'normal' there. It will never be what they think it should be, (Main Street, USA).
The reason the government hestitates over leaving is because the situation will be 10 times worse when we are not there. Everyone will say, 'who created this madness?" And we all know the answer to that.........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Senator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
13. Yes, "impeach the idiot" -- Oh, and about "whining"...
Another word for it is "lobbying."

It happens to be the only way other than voting to participate in the governing process of the country we own. And something non-owner, profit entities spend billions on.

We need much more "whining." And we can "whine" our way to impeachment. And to the Redemption of Our National Soul.

How? "Violence" is The Answer.

--

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
14. awesome response
Fantastic response, right to the point


Bravo to you, and no (boo hoo)!!!!


Our military is supposed to defend this Country, not to illegally invade other
ones for lies and deceit.

I was in the Air Force several years ago, and was proud to serve. Iraq has been nothing but
lies
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lwcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. As the guy on your avatar knows too well
... the media can't stand the complexity of people who are both bold enough to fight and bold enough to stand up against a misbegotten war.

Glad to hear from you here, and if you didn't catch the story of James Webb's encounter with Bush, it's a great snapshot of the difference between a patriot and a heel:

http://vastleft.blogspot.com/2006/11/tangling-with-webb.html


___

Hey, the liberal light is always on at the Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy. Please stop by and say "hi!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC