|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
clarquistador (49 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-02-06 10:50 AM Original message |
Should the oil industry be nationalized? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-02-06 10:54 AM Response to Original message |
1. Already is nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Retired AF Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-02-06 10:54 AM Response to Original message |
2. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
clarquistador (49 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-02-06 10:56 AM Response to Reply #2 |
5. We need to study state-owned oil companies around the world..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rfranklin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-02-06 10:57 AM Response to Reply #2 |
9. Dumb comparison, Amtrak is not run for profit... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
clarquistador (49 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-02-06 11:00 AM Response to Reply #9 |
11. That's because...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Retired AF Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-02-06 11:08 AM Response to Reply #11 |
16. Yes that is where the old saying of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Retired AF Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-02-06 11:05 AM Response to Reply #9 |
14. VA hospitals? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Trillo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-02-06 03:05 PM Response to Reply #2 |
21. "I doubt if the Govt can run the oil business" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rfranklin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-02-06 10:55 AM Response to Original message |
3. If we're paying to secure the oil, we should have a share of profit... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Peace Patriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-02-06 10:55 AM Response to Original message |
4. Yes. And we should also nationalize the U.S. military. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ashling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-02-06 10:56 AM Response to Original message |
6. Welcome to DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-02-06 10:57 AM Response to Original message |
7. not just no, but hell no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
clarquistador (49 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-02-06 10:58 AM Response to Reply #7 |
10. That's kind of hard.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheFarseer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-02-06 10:57 AM Response to Original message |
8. no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Heewack (297 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-02-06 11:03 AM Response to Original message |
12. Given Venezuala, Mexico, and Russia as examples |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Trillo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-02-06 04:11 PM Response to Reply #12 |
22. Cheny/Bush energy meeting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HereSince1628 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-02-06 11:04 AM Response to Original message |
13. No. We need to enforce anti-trust laws and related regulations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Schema Thing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-02-06 11:07 AM Response to Original message |
15. No, but yes, sorta. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
welshTerrier2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-02-06 11:09 AM Response to Original message |
17. of course |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mark E. Smith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-02-06 11:12 AM Response to Original message |
18. In a heartbeat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-02-06 11:17 AM Response to Original message |
19. Yes. Energy is too vital to a nation's economy to be in private hands. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stillcool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-02-06 11:21 AM Response to Original message |
20. it's kind of funny... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
threadkillaz (453 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-02-06 04:29 PM Response to Original message |
23. Perhaps on Refining end, but not Exploration |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
happydreams (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-02-06 06:45 PM Response to Original message |
24. It is a neccessary first step in changing our energy policy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 10:53 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC