|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
elocs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-29-06 05:46 PM Original message |
23 U.S. Senators who voted against the Iraq War Resolution who do not need to recant their vote: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Trajan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-29-06 05:48 PM Response to Original message |
1. Good luck with that ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Boojatta (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-29-06 11:27 PM Response to Reply #1 |
34. Why not spread the word that some of the people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Trajan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-29-06 11:46 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. The 'Either/Or' proposition has a name ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Boojatta (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-30-06 12:10 PM Response to Reply #35 |
48. If you don't agree with the assumption, then that is fine. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Joad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-29-06 06:01 PM Response to Original message |
2. Those who voted for it were ignorant fools. Or worse. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-29-06 06:03 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. They were worse because they knew better /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-29-06 06:03 PM Response to Original message |
3. There is one way that someone who voted for it can redeem themseleves in my eyes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
2Design (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-29-06 06:06 PM Response to Original message |
5. well this is our list of possible candidates - because they have a brain |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-29-06 06:08 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. There are those who were outside of Congress, and also oppossed the IWR |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
2Design (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-29-06 06:31 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. yes that is correct too - but no candidate who vote for this insanity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elocs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-29-06 06:46 PM Response to Reply #6 |
16. That was what I was trying to infer by also including |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
2Design (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-29-06 07:04 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. didn't kunich vote against the war???? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freefall (617 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-29-06 07:15 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. Yes but he is a Representative rather than a Senator. There were |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-30-06 12:51 AM Response to Reply #18 |
36. yes, but he is in the house not the senate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ninja Jordan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-29-06 06:50 PM Response to Reply #5 |
17. Why are the others necessarily fools? Perhaps those who voted against IWR |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Le Taz Hot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-30-06 01:31 AM Response to Reply #17 |
38. And perhaps it was neither |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DaveinMD (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-29-06 06:15 PM Response to Original message |
7. and only one of them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-29-06 06:20 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Carl Levin, Jack Reed, Paul Wellstone so actually three. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DaveinMD (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-29-06 06:21 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. I stand corrected |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-30-06 05:47 AM Response to Reply #8 |
40. Dick Durbin too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pierre.Suave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-29-06 06:24 PM Response to Original message |
10. Well a few comments... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pennylane100 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-29-06 06:37 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. Conyers is a congressman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pierre.Suave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-29-06 08:46 PM Response to Reply #14 |
30. D'oh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BluegrassDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-29-06 06:33 PM Response to Original message |
12. These senators displayed good judgment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-29-06 06:34 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. me too and for the same reason |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ninja Jordan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-29-06 06:39 PM Response to Original message |
15. They also all live in districts where they face little to no opposition from the GOP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beaconess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-29-06 07:14 PM Response to Reply #15 |
19. These are Senators - they don't have districts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ninja Jordan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-29-06 07:18 PM Response to Reply #19 |
23. I meant states. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beaconess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-29-06 08:11 PM Response to Reply #23 |
29. But these states aren't solid blue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elocs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-29-06 07:16 PM Response to Reply #15 |
21. So let me get this straight-- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithy Cherub (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-29-06 07:18 PM Response to Reply #15 |
22. Senator Byrd voted no and said it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ninja Jordan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-29-06 07:19 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. Foolish on national security or rather a difference of opinion? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithy Cherub (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-29-06 07:27 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. How many are apologizing for such a lapse in judgment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ninja Jordan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-29-06 07:31 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. No, it was poor judgment in that he (Edwards) didn't discover the truth at the time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-29-06 07:36 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. with all due respect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Le Taz Hot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-30-06 01:39 AM Response to Reply #26 |
39. So how was it that I, little LTH |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-30-06 05:52 AM Response to Reply #24 |
41. Byrd voted no because he didn't want to give Bush unlimited authority to go to war |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trashcanistanista (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-30-06 01:31 PM Response to Reply #41 |
49. Exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-29-06 07:36 PM Response to Original message |
28. Excellent points. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ooglymoogly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-29-06 09:00 PM Response to Original message |
31. i for one will not vote for anyone who voted for this insanity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lostnotforgotten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-29-06 09:23 PM Response to Reply #31 |
33. Which Includes Hillary! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trashcanistanista (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-30-06 01:51 PM Response to Reply #31 |
50. I feel the same |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kat 333 (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-30-06 07:56 PM Response to Reply #31 |
52. Right On |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catchawave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-29-06 09:18 PM Response to Original message |
32. Do any of these have crossover appeal ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-30-06 01:01 AM Response to Reply #32 |
37. Kerry also joined the military and volunteered to fight in a war |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-30-06 06:37 AM Response to Reply #32 |
43. "Waffling" on what and how specifically.......can you elaborate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-30-06 07:20 AM Response to Reply #32 |
45. Most of them are too old to run for President |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-30-06 06:32 AM Response to Original message |
42. Means we had 23 Senators with Courage and conviction..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-30-06 07:17 AM Response to Reply #42 |
44. It was all about unilaterally going to war vs a coalition in my view |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-30-06 08:10 AM Response to Reply #44 |
46. Agreed....and the measures you suggest were exactly what the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTLawGuy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-30-06 10:03 AM Response to Original message |
47. This is why I'm starting to think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Little Star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-30-06 08:44 PM Response to Reply #47 |
53. I've just started thinking the same thing. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-30-06 02:20 PM Response to Original message |
51. More information |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 01:21 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC