Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Regarding the Medicare Rx Negotiation Bill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Frustratedlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 04:24 PM
Original message
Regarding the Medicare Rx Negotiation Bill
First of all, since the Kid says he is going to veto the Bill if it is passed, what percentage does it take to override the veto?

Second, what happens if the drug companies get their heads together and refuse to negotiate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. 2/3 - and they don't have it
However, the up side is that America will get a good look at GOP priorities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billybob537 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. 60% I believe
to overide the veto, entirely possible The good thing about the drug companys getting together is the first one to bail gets the money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Ah, the prisoner's dilemma
which has been discussed before on DU and with only one game the defector wins. A drug company will step forward, guaranteed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frustratedlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I'm sorry, but I don't understand....
Could you both explain what you mean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. My bad (or if you prefer mea culpa)
Edited on Fri Jan-12-07 07:04 PM by rock
Perhaps this linkhttp://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=364&topic_id=3024052 will explain it best.

The concept is that in defection games the one to defect first wins the most. But this does not work if the game is repeated many times, then "tit for tat" strategy wins. Remeber OPEC, as long as they hung together they all won.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frustratedlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Thank you for pointing out that thread.
The one thought that particularly rang a bell with me was that this administration's antics will continue, so long as there are no consequences to be paid for their actions. Never having paid the consequences for his actions is precisely why the present leader of this great nation continues to do as he pleases. Why not?

I hope the upcoming trial will be the beginning of consequences being served on those who so richly deserve them and that any future idea of pardons will be enough to throw the public uprising and outcry into the equation. It is becoming more and more apparent that taking to the streets by our citizenry is the only solution to this dire dilemma we find ourselves in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-13-07 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I'm a 100% with you on that
As long as we don't call the lawbreaking politicians on their crimes, they will continue to escalate them. Look at bush* as an example: the more he gets away with, the more he wants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchtv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. 2/3 vote overides
I don't think thry can get involved in collusion. Anti trust violations there , I would think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-12-07 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
6. 2/3's vote needed to override a veto.
Todays vote was 231 in favor, which means they would need another 55 votes in the House. The Senate won't take this up until next week.

I'm thinkingenough people contacting their Reps COULD swing 55 votes. Today's vote was obviously along party lines, but if these folks got enough calls, I think it could change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC