Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Democrats 2008: Hillary 40%, Obama 21% Edwards 11%

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
oberliner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 12:06 AM
Original message
Democrats 2008: Hillary 40%, Obama 21% Edwards 11%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's just name recognition at this point. Ignore. I was in polling for 8 years. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
2. Hillary is stagnated at this amt. for weeks. I feel this is her max support
She is too well known and has been around forever so, the polls will not show much movement up for her. She is at her max. People's opinion has been set for 15 years. She has been an old face around so, movement won't be much.
As the candidates get thier campaigns in gear and rev up and go out and campaign the numbers will move down but, not up much if at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Iowa loves Hillary, especially the women
Hillary will be our next presidnt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oberliner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Do you have a sense of whose numbers will go up?
I know its early, but any sense of who might close the gap?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. A classic. This one includes Al Sharpton, but leaves out Wes Clark
I'm sure it's just an oversight. Again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oberliner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Do you think Clark or Sharpton will run?
Has there been any noise from either of them about running in 2008?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Posted by kos at kos on Friday January 26th
"Clark is two weeks away from decision. Supposedly."

by kos

Fri Jan 26, 2007 at 03:34:26 PM PST
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/1/26/182356/614

The Diary received 750 posts.


Maybe you should direct your question about Sharpton to the people who conducted the poll that this DU thread is about. They must have a reason for including Sharpton, right?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oberliner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 01:28 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. well he did run in 2004
And Wikipedia lists him (with Clark and Gore) in the "potential candidates without an exploratory committee" category.

He's quoted on there as saying he is considering a run for 2008 so who knows.

Do you think there was something more sinister in the inclusion of Sharpton in the poll?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 01:50 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. No, not at all. But it called my attention to Clark's exclusion
And I might not have cared so much about that if this was an isolated instance, but it isn't. Wes Clark is fairly frequently left out of polls which include Democrats with poll numbers lower than the ones Clark brings when he is included in a poll. Cumulatively that type of ommission from coverage of the 2008 field takes a toll on the poll numbers a candidate actually gets when he or she actually is included. It's essentially anti-buzz.

This is the first time that I've seen Sharpton included in a poll that Clark was left out of. That caught my attention. I can't think of any objective criteria the people who put together this poll could have been using that would explain including Sharpton, but not Clark, can you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
7. Iowa doesn't love Hillary. The reports are they are listening but, skeptical
they said they were polite but, people said they aren't too excited by her. they are skeptical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comradebillyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. you don't love hilliary but
I don't think you are in a position to speak for everyone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
10. Meaningless numbers. A lot can happen in a year. Just wait and see. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Apollo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 07:11 AM
Response to Original message
13. I predict the race will stay wide open thru the Fall
The race for the Dem nomination will stay wide open - not only in Iowa but also nationally.

If I'm right then it could provide the circumstances for Al Gore to "change his mind" and enter the race as late as November 4th, which would be exactly one year before election day.

I say "change his mind" - but I believe that right now Al Gore is keeping his options open. He hasn't ruled out running again and he still has some time to watch the field and consider his options.

Personally I don't like the early start to the 2008 Presidential election campaign. Don't forget that Bill Clinton announced his candidacy in October 1991 and still went on to win.

Candidates are taking the risk that people will get bored of their campaigns before 2008!

Let's all find ways to show our support for Al Gore! :)

In Gore We Trust

www.algore.com
www.algore.org
www.draftgore.com - Sign the petition!
www.draftgore2008.org
www.patriotsforgore.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC