|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 12:21 PM Original message |
Edwards Hits A Home Run on MTP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chimpymustgo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 12:23 PM Response to Original message |
1. He was fantastic. Honest, courageous, straightforward. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluzmann57 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 12:25 PM Response to Original message |
2. It seemed like Russert was trying to bait him as well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dracos (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 12:34 PM Response to Reply #2 |
9. I picked up on that also |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sendero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 03:26 PM Response to Reply #2 |
22. Of course he was.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mnhtnbb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 12:25 PM Response to Original message |
3. Missed it. Would you put up a link when available? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
question everything (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 01:16 PM Response to Reply #3 |
16. So did I |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 12:26 PM Response to Original message |
4. Watching now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chimpymustgo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 12:33 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. That "Clinton part" is just another LYING OP, as you will see watching the show. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 12:37 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. Let me put it like this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gloria (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 03:36 PM Response to Reply #10 |
24. And we remember how Clinton was enabling Bush on Iraq...so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 04:51 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Funny |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 09:37 PM Response to Reply #7 |
34. The mods allowed it because it wasn't a lie. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
venable (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 08:14 AM Response to Reply #34 |
47. Anyone who speaks English knows he didn't blame Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 12:29 PM Response to Original message |
5. He did just fine. Agree with your list of adjectives also. Well-chosen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dracos (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 12:30 PM Response to Original message |
6. Verry impressive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rep the dems (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 12:34 PM Response to Original message |
8. I did not see the interview with Edwards this morning, and I'm wondering |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 12:39 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. He said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
soswolf (84 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 12:52 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. I think he won over a lot of people with that answer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rep the dems (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 12:57 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. I feel exactly the same way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 01:29 PM Response to Reply #11 |
18. I wouldn't assume you know what is in their hearts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Breeze54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 07:08 PM Response to Reply #11 |
28. Agreed! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
theoldman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 12:47 PM Response to Original message |
12. The thing that stuck with me the most on this interview were the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Larkspur (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 03:23 PM Response to Reply #12 |
21. I could buy the "bad" intelligence argument if it wasn't for the two thirds of Dems in the House who |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Apollo11 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 06:38 AM Response to Reply #12 |
45. It's the first time I heard that 2002 quote from Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Felinity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 01:05 PM Response to Original message |
15. Please see my reply #26 on this thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
retread (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 01:20 PM Response to Original message |
17. I hope when he releases his health care plan tomorrow, it is not as muddled as |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EVDebs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 03:10 PM Response to Original message |
19. Edward's financing government plans are the only sane ones so far... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnLocke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 03:20 PM Response to Original message |
20. Edwards was great. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gloria (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 03:33 PM Response to Original message |
23. I think he is really channeling Clark on the Middle East....which will |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dogman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 04:05 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. This Clarkie is more amused than nuts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gloria (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 06:47 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. He also said made comments that sounded a whole lot like Clark's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Texas_Kat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 07:17 PM Response to Reply #27 |
30. Too bad he doesn't really understand it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chimpymustgo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 07:56 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. Edwards was great. The jealously and resentment is palable on the board. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 09:44 PM Response to Reply #31 |
36. Pssst... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chimpymustgo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:22 PM Response to Reply #36 |
38. Pssst... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alcibiades (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 11:27 PM Response to Reply #36 |
41. Edwards won SC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unc70 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 03:33 AM Response to Reply #36 |
43. Russert will gladly drag up Clark's 2003 comments for IWR |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Texas_Kat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 11:44 AM Response to Reply #43 |
57. Naw, they went thru all that in 03-04 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
venable (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 08:26 AM Response to Reply #36 |
50. pssst |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gloria (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 09:34 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. I'm sure he understands it. That sort of comment doesn't reflect well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
venable (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 08:22 AM Response to Reply #30 |
49. TexasKat - woud you like to explain how Edwards doesn't understand it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Texas_Kat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 12:07 PM Response to Reply #49 |
62. Even Craig Crawford caught the non-sequiturs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
venable (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 12:18 PM Response to Reply #62 |
65. how about that shows his courage and his honest and his wisdom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Texas_Kat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 02:08 PM Response to Reply #65 |
68. or that he talks out of both sides of his mouth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
venable (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 05:27 PM Response to Reply #68 |
73. good lord he is not quoting Wes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Texas_Kat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 05:53 PM Response to Reply #73 |
74. And quite a departure from what Edwards said at AIPAC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
venable (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 07:02 PM Response to Reply #74 |
76. fine, if that's what you want to think in this witch hunt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
venable (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 08:18 AM Response to Reply #25 |
48. wow, you mean BOTH Clark and Edwards said 'carrots and sticks'? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Texas_Kat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 11:56 AM Response to Reply #48 |
60. Nope, Edwards attempt to parrot this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
venable (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 06:16 PM Response to Reply #60 |
75. this is commonly held belief by many dems, most of europe, most of everyone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
venable (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 09:08 AM Response to Reply #25 |
53. to find meaning in the inversion of 'carrots and sticks' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dogman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 05:16 PM Response to Reply #53 |
72. Wrong, I wrote the inversion was not amusing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Texas_Kat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 07:15 PM Response to Reply #23 |
29. The "Clark as VP" meme came from Chris Lehane |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 10:01 PM Response to Reply #29 |
37. 04 all over again. They tried to tie Clark to the Clintons to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 09:40 PM Response to Reply #23 |
35. Nuts??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chimpymustgo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 11:06 PM Response to Reply #35 |
39. Then why did Clarkies fight, argue, Freep every poll for Clark to be VP??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nedsdag (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 11:20 PM Response to Reply #39 |
40. I haven't decided on a candidate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
venable (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 08:29 AM Response to Reply #40 |
51. I think the General would ask them to cool it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Texas_Kat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 02:09 PM Response to Reply #51 |
69. There are as many obnoxious Edwards supporters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Texas_Kat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 11:49 AM Response to Reply #39 |
58. Because we learned something we didn't know at the time? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catchawave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 11:51 AM Response to Reply #39 |
59. Does Clark want to be V.P. ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
venable (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 09:10 AM Response to Reply #35 |
54. Edwards has no interest in 'channeling Clark' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Texas_Kat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 12:09 PM Response to Reply #54 |
63. Then JE should find someone else to crib from |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
venable (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 12:15 PM Response to Reply #63 |
64. did Clark invent carrots and stick and talking with enemies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JNelson6563 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 09:50 AM Response to Reply #35 |
55. I think you missed the points |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Contrite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-04-07 09:29 PM Response to Original message |
32. How come Kucinich is never on Timmy's show? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FourScore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 01:03 AM Response to Original message |
42. I agree. He was outstanding. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LaPera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 03:39 AM Response to Original message |
44. I love Edwards... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 08:03 AM Response to Original message |
46. I saw that interview on Press the Meat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
venable (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 08:31 AM Response to Reply #46 |
52. interesting how Russert seemed determined to bring JE low |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 09:50 AM Response to Reply #52 |
56. Russet was trying to do a hatchet job on Edwards, that's for sure. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 11:59 AM Response to Original message |
61. Uh...not how I read it...transcript... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chimpymustgo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 01:46 PM Response to Reply #61 |
66. Craven misinterpretation of what Edwards said. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 01:53 PM Response to Reply #66 |
67. Exactly how was it misinterpreted... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chimpymustgo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 02:18 PM Response to Reply #67 |
70. He was not BLAMING Clinton, or the Clintons, or the Clinton administration. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 03:33 PM Response to Reply #70 |
71. Parsing words... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elizm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 07:08 PM Response to Reply #66 |
77. Magnificent??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Strawman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-05-07 07:39 PM Response to Original message |
78. He didn't impress me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 08:27 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC