bigdarryl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-19-07 07:37 PM
Original message |
| Tweety: hows Obama going to beat Hillary in the primary with all that money she has.. |
|
Simple by being HIMSELF and not coming across as a phony to the voters and coming across as a likable guy and not taking an issue because of polls.What the media doesn't say is Hillary negatives are through the roof 48% she's not going to change that regardless what she does
|
| papau
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-19-07 07:46 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. Tweety may be correct - the GOP Pres primary years back much money did not translate into |
|
many votes for a Texan Federal legislature.
|
| Joe Bacon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-20-07 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 10. And I remember how well John Connolly did in 1980 |
|
Edited on Tue Feb-20-07 12:46 AM by Joe Bacon
Connolly raised a record 20 Million and wound up winning only ONE delegate!
|
| peacetalksforall
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-19-07 07:48 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. If he could be perfectly truthful about war and if his truth meshes |
|
with the voters, it will make an enormous impact. Truth might rule over money. People will go a little out of their way to hear what he says, because he's been doing quite well and there is a fascination. If he is truthful, however, he will probably be in big trouble with the big war corporations. Our country is not a democracy.
|
| pnwmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-19-07 07:57 PM
Response to Original message |
| 3. Actually, Sen. Clinton's "positives" are higher than her "negatives." |
|
Very few people have no opinion about Clinton, so all her numbers are much higher than the other candidates. As the other candidates become more well known, their numbers -- both negative and positive -- will also rise. It remains to be seen how any of them will compare with her in the end. But at this point, Sen. Clinton's positive ratings outweigh her negative ratings -- and that's the bottom line.
|
| Windy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-19-07 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
And that is a matter of opinion, just like your statement.
|
| pnwmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-19-07 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
| 7. I'm referring to her POLL NUMBERS, not to my personal opinion. |
| SaveElmer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-19-07 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 5. Hillary's numbers are higher than negatives... |
|
Recent USAToday had it at 58-40...with her negatives dropping...
Do deny otherwise is simply wrong...
|
| SaveElmer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-19-07 08:52 PM
Response to Original message |
|
As much as that distresses people here in DU land...
Fact it she is well liked among the Democratic rank and file...with a very high positive to negative approval ration among Democrats...
|
| pnwmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-19-07 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
| 8. And the Repubs who hate her just haven't had enough time |
|
to learn to hate all the other Dems yet.
|
| SaveElmer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-19-07 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
|
But I am sure they will get to it soon enough!
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Mon May 06th 2024, 02:06 PM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
