Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Court Orders Bush Labor Department to Respond to Unions’ Safety Suit

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 07:51 PM
Original message
Court Orders Bush Labor Department to Respond to Unions’ Safety Suit


http://blog.aflcio.org/2007/02/20/court-orders-bush-labor-department-to-respond-to-unions%e2%80%99-safety-suit/

Court Orders Bush Labor Department to Respond to Unions’ Safety Suit

by Mike Hall, Feb 20, 2007

The Bush administration’s Department of Labor is not going to be able to duck a suit filed by the AFL-CIO and the United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW) over the department’s failure to finish a safety rule requiring employers to pay for workers’ personal protective equipment (PPE). Protective gear, such as specialized clothing, lifelines, face shields, gloves and other equipment, is used by an estimated 20 million workers to protect them from job hazards.

On Friday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ordered the Bush administration to respond to the suit, filed Jan. 3, within 30 days.

By the government’s own estimates, the PPE rule could have prevented 400,000 injuries and saved 50 lives since it was first proposed by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) in 1999.

The lawsuit asserts the Bush administration’s failure to act is putting workers in danger. The union groups say workers in some of America’s most dangerous industries—meatpacking, poultry and construction—and low-wage and immigrant workers who suffer high-injury rates are vulnerable to being forced by their employers to pay for their own safety gear because of OSHA’s failure to finish the rule.

In 1997, OSHA announced that it would issue a rule on protective gear, and it formally proposed a rule in 1999. The proposed rule does not impose any new obligations on employers to provide safety equipment; it simply clarifies that employers, not employees, have the responsibility to pay for it.

In 2003, the AFL-CIO and UFCW petitioned the safety agency to finish the protective equipment standard. In addition, the Congressional Hispanic Caucus made several requests to OSHA to finish the rule. But OSHA has yet to act.

The lawsuit asks the court to issue an order directing the secretary of labor to complete the protective gear rule within 60 days of the court’s order.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Miss Chybil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-20-07 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. K & R. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC