Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Geffen slams Clintons

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
JoseNarof Donating Member (61 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 11:10 AM
Original message
Geffen slams Clintons
Edited on Wed Feb-21-07 11:18 AM by JoseNarof
I take this as GOOD news indeed!

"Hillary Clinton's campaign apparently didn't take too kindly to the harsh rhetoric from L.A. music mogul David Geffen, courtesy of today's Maureen Dowd. Geffen, who is backing Barack Obama, called Bill Clinton "reckless" and clearly is still upset that Clinton didn't grant a pardon to cause celeb native American Leonard Peltier. More Geffen: "Marc Rich getting pardoned? An oil-profiteer expatriate who left the country rather than pay taxes or face justice?"

Clinton chief spokesperson Howard Wolfson, in a release this a.m., is "demanding that" Obama "disavow personal attacks" from Geffen. Wolfson: "While Senator Obama was denouncing slash and burn politics yesterday, his campaign's finance chair was viciously and personally attacking Senator Clinton and her husband. If Senator Obama is indeed sincere about his repeated claims to change the tone of our politics, he should immediately denounce these remarks, remove Mr. Geffen from his campaign and return his money. While Democrats should engage in a vigorous debate on the issues, there is no place in our party or our politics for the kind of personal insults made by Senator Obama's principal fundraiser."

"Everybody in politics lies, but they do it with such ease, it’s troubling,” Geffen said.


http://hotlineblog.nationaljournal.com/archives/2007/02/falling_on_geff.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. Choke on it Wolfson
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoseNarof Donating Member (61 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Hell yeah!
I don't think Hillary is gonna steam roll any of us!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. So much for Obama and a "different type of politics"
It will be the same ol same ol attacks with him too!

It seems they can't help themselves


:puke: :puke: :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 11:22 AM
Original message
I'm sorry does Barack tell Geffen what to say or not say?
or anyone outside of his campaign? No of course not. Geffen can say what he wants and just because he gave to Obama doesn't mean anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I'm sorry does Barack tell Geffen what to say or not say?
or anyone outside of his campaign? No of course not. Geffen can say what he wants and just because he gave to Obama doesn't mean anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ripple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. What Geffen said wasn't a personal attack
Edited on Wed Feb-21-07 11:25 AM by ripple
He was criticizing a policy decision Clinton made in pardoning Marc Rich, but not Leanard Peltier.

I don't consider that a personal attack at all.



Edit: spelling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Please rank the word "reckless" on a 1 to 5 positive/negative scale. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ripple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. I think it was reckless for Hillary to vote yes on the IWR
That isn't a personal attack, it's a criticism of a decision she made as a senator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. "...bipartisan support for this resolution makes success in the United Nations
more likely, and therfore, war less likely".

What's "reckless" about the pursuit of UN inspections for WMD?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ripple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. I don't wish to debate the IWR with you
I was simply giving an example of how a politician's decisions can be considered reckless, without it equating a personal attack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. There was NO requirement for any inspections in the IWR
Her floor statements are utterly irrlevant.
It's her opinion, nothing more. Means absolutely nothing in terms of authorizing the use of force.

Could you examine Sec.s 2 and 3 of the actual LAW and post the legal requirement for any inspections?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Neither does it mention sticking a thermometer up Saddam's ass to find out
Edited on Wed Feb-21-07 02:23 PM by oasis
if he is in compliance. One has to assume that appropriate measures (inspections) would be taken.

If you get a subpoena ordering you to court by 10 a.m. Friday, it won't tell you to take #85 bus to Maple Ave. and then transfer to the westbound Elm street line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 02:46 PM
Original message
Not a personal attack?
"Everybody in politics lies, but they do it with such ease, it’s troubling,” Geffen said.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. I guess you have proof that Obama talked with Geffen about trashing HRC
Let's see it.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #7
21. It's kind of unfair to blame Obama for Geffen
Some of the snark is over the top, but things like the Rich pardon DO need to be looked at closely now. There was a reason it was controversial and the more you look - the worse it looks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
3. don't get too excited
Geffen is known to slam everybody and often does it to the press for attention. Even with his billions, not many in the entertainment industry pay much attention to him.

Wolfson's just being Wolfson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
4. Marc Rich pardon IS more serious than people realize - Think Plame-outing, BCCI.
Edited on Wed Feb-21-07 12:02 PM by blm
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x252817

The whole Bill Clinton - Denise Rich speculation from the media and RW talkradio was a convenient smokescreen to hide yet another IranContra figure pardon. Clinton may or may not have been duped into protecting Poppy Bush yet again.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Talk about inappropriate comparisons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
19. Not if you read the link. Marc Rich was a central figure to the BFEE. Libby was Rich's
lawyer for many years.

This goes way BEYOND any reasons Clinton was attacked for during that time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. Wow, quite the thread there blm. Thanks for posting it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razorman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. While I am sure President Clinton generally meant well,
I always thought that the Marc Rich pardon (among others) stunk to high heaven. I wonder if the people on this forum, who may think it was no big deal, will show the same lack of outrage when Shrub pardons the two convicted border patrol agents, or even Scooter Libby (assuming he is convicted).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
25. Thank you blm, this is a great source of information
People forget about the Clinton sleaze and corruption because we are still angry at GOP coup attempts, but the GOPs, evil does not mean we can ignore Clintonian sins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
11. After reading the links it seems very much to me
like Obama's campaign finance chair (who's also a very wealthy media mogul) criticized BILL Clinton for pardons that he did and did not make. I didn't actually see any place that Geffen even refers to Hillary or any personal issues with her. IMHO, it's REALLY stretching it to call this a personal attack by Obama on Hillary. The fact that her spokesman would go so far as refer to this as "slash-and-burn" politics makes it seem to me like Hillary is just taking this opportunity to try to smear Obama's campaign as dirty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nedsdag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. This is not the first time he's slammed her.
I remember a report on CNN I believe when Geffen told an audience that Hillary is unelectable.

Where was Howard Wolfson then? Give me a break!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
16. Oh god, is this going to be a looooooooong primary season.
I wish they would all stop attacking each other, get to work on salvaging what's left of this pathetic country, and put the campaigns on hold until early next year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #16
26. Hillary is leading in the polls because many Democrats don't know her like we do
The more Hillary's record becomes known, the more support she will lose.

I rather have her campaign collapse during the primaries than have her collapse as the nominee of our party.

Hillary belongs in the Senate, let's keep her there!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
23. Geffen is being politically astute
He clearly can't stand the Clintons and managed to get the name "Marc Rich" back into the New York Times.
Ouch!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
27. Locking
The thread starter has been banned.

mvd
DU Moderator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC