Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sibel Edmonds probably won't be endorsing Senator Clinton

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Check12 Donating Member (445 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 06:26 PM
Original message
Sibel Edmonds probably won't be endorsing Senator Clinton
Here is an article written back in August of last year.

There are some very interesting paragraphs concerning VA issues.
It seems like there were some oversight problems.

From:
Hillary Clinton, a Fool's Vessel
By SIBEL EDMONDS
and WILLIAM WEAVER

James J. DiGeorgio and Carl Steubing died in ways no war veteran should. They were subjected to illegal drug experimentation by employees of the Stratton Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Albany, New York; killed by servants of the very government they fought to protect. Scores of other veterans were injured in these experiments, and only by the courage of whistleblowers Jeffrey Fudin and Anthony Mariano was any measure of justice achieved for these misdeeds. One person was convicted of manslaughter, but investigations into other officials collapsed because of a lack of institutional nerve to follow the investigation to the end. A scape-goated employee went to prison, while those who supervised, facilitated, and reaped the benefits of the lucrative, illegal drug testing went on to other VA positions with promotions and raises.

Between 2000 and June 2006, numerous contacts with Senator Hillary Clinton over the Stratton tragedy went unacknowledged, or glossed over, or shuffled around to various offices with no substantive action. No less than five Clinton staff members heard presentations and received documentation about the experiments, and Senator Clinton herself is personally aware of the detailed facts of the case. This personal knowledge did not translate into action, for though Senator Clinton carefully scripts her numerous public appearances to give the impression of caring and concern, her actions speak otherwise. She noted "our nation made a pact with those who serve their country in the Armed Forces ­ a commitment that those who served would have access to quality health care through the VA hospital system . . . and they deserve to be treated as the best." But while Senator Clinton was issuing such lofty statements and mugging for photo opportunities with active duty military, she did nothing about the systematic abuse and murder of veterans within her own constituency. The Veterans Affairs Whistleblowers Coalition, and more recently the National Security Whistleblowers Coalition, sent numerous letters and e-mails and copious documentation, pleading for help from the Senator to investigate and address the crimes committed at Stratton, including unrelenting retaliation against the whistleblowers who brought these matters to public attention.

I am NOT attempting to bash HRC or anyone else, Sibel Edmonds is, so please don't flame the messenger!
I just thought this was worth a post to the DU community considering recent events at Walter Reed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Check12 Donating Member (445 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oops, here is a link to the article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Counterpunch should be taken with a grain of salt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Counterpunch is a pretty questionable source
Is there another source on this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ok - I am now convinced that Sibel is a little off.
The article is full of half-truths - a very good method for making a whole lie.

I am sure you posted this because you have another candidate your are supporting but this kind of crap is pushing me toward Senator Clinton - not away.

A very sophomoric attempt to influence primary decisions ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Check12 Donating Member (445 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. At this point in the state of our union
I will take a half truth over no truth.

I do not support any candidate at this point, thanks for asking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Can you please elaborate on what is not true?
Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC