Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

TPM: 3000 Pages of Purge (DOJ/Conyers statements)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 07:48 AM
Original message
TPM: 3000 Pages of Purge (DOJ/Conyers statements)
Edited on Tue Mar-20-07 08:11 AM by babylonsister
http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/002808.php

3000 Pages of Purge
By Paul Kiel - March 20, 2007, 12:20 AM

This evening, as you probably know by now, the Justice Department turned over 3,000 pages of documents to Congress. And hard working staffers are working the scanners to pump out pdfs at an impressive rate. You can see the result here.

We'll get started early in the morning on those documents (and in the meantime, please let us know what you find).

Also, just for contrast, here are two statements out about the release tongiht. One from the Justice Department:

"Taking a virtually unprecedented step, the Justice Department released 3,000 pages of documents today on the dismissal of the eight U.S. Attorneys and has offered to make Department officials available voluntarily for "on the record" interviews and hearings. The Attorney General wants the Congress and the American people to understand both the reasons for the Department's decisions and its efforts to inform Congress about this matter. The Department did not remove the U.S. Attorneys for improper reasons, such as to prevent or retaliate for a particular prosecution in a public corruption matter. Because the American public must have confidence that such considerations did not factor into the decisions here, the Justice Department is being transparent and forthcoming with the Congress."

And from House Judiciary Chairman John Conyers (D-MI), who's marvelling at the DoJ's ability to withhold some of the most important information while drowning Congress in documents:

"While I appreciate the Department's willingness to make these voluminous documents regarding the U.S. Attorney firings available to us for review, I am disappointed that they are denying other important information to Congress without any real authority to do so. This investigation has uncovered serious charges of misleading congress, obstructing justice, and abuse of power. I hope we can resolve the outstanding issues over redactions, but if necessary, we are prepared to press ahead to get to the bottom of this growing scandal, using subpoenas if necessary."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Monkeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. Go Get Them Tear them up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. And while you're at it Mr Conyers,
don't forget the subpoenas for the RNC server that they use to skirt the White House mail system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yes yes yes... those shadow communication systems must be sealed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. Time for a kick?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 02:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC