Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senate To Vote Today At 5 P.M. To Nix Withdrawal Timetable

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 03:52 PM
Original message
Senate To Vote Today At 5 P.M. To Nix Withdrawal Timetable
http://electioncentral.tpmcafe.com/blog/electioncentral/2007/mar/27/senate_to_vote_today_at_5_p_m_to_nix_withdrawal_timetable

Election Central
Senate To Vote Today At 5 P.M. To Nix Withdrawal Timetable
By Greg Sargent | bio

Time to pay attention to what's going on in the Senate: Today that august legislative body is going to be voting on an amendment to strike the withdrawal timetable from the Senate's Iraq war funding legislation.

Jim Manley, a spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, just confirmed to me that the vote is set for 5:00 P.M. today. One Republican after another has paraded before the Senate throughout the afternoon, many arguing that keeping the withdrawal timetable in the legislation would be embracing failure, selling out the troops, or worse.

The amendment is the work of GOP Senator Thad Cochran of Mississippi. Even if the amendment doesn't pass, however, GOP Senate leader Mitch McConnell may allow the vote to go through -- rather than using procedural tricks to block it, as he has in the past -- in which case the overall bill if it passed would proceed to the President's desk, where it would meet with a veto.

This is a long, slow, grinding process in which every incremental development matters. The fate of the amendment is still uncertain, so stay with us for the vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
iconoclastic cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Uh, anything we can do? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. How many Dems wil vote for it?
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rusty MacHenry Donating Member (164 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Minus LIEberman, probally none of them
The Democrats are pretty united behind this bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. Gordon Smith, R-OR, just voted No.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. Anyone listening?
Lieberman is so far the only going along with this. Salazar, Ben Nelson, Smith were no's with the dems from what I heard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. It had better get voted down. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
7. Senator Chuck Hagel, R-NE, votes No.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
8. Pryor was an aye.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. 50 no 48 yes
Dems win
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
9. 48/50
nays have it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Cochran amendment fails. The timetable will not be stripped from the bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Babel_17 Donating Member (948 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
11. Seems like the amendment failed
48 - 50
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
13. Reid sounds fairly upbeat; pondering where to go next. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC