Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Scaring The Pants Off Men (TomPaine.com)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 10:25 AM
Original message
Scaring The Pants Off Men (TomPaine.com)
Edited on Wed Mar-28-07 10:31 AM by marmar
Scaring The Pants Off Men
Paul Waldman
March 28, 2007


Paul Waldman is a senior fellow at Media Matters for America and the author of the new book, Being Right is Not Enough: What Progressives Can Learn From Conservative Success. The views expressed here are his own.

Last week saw Al Gore's triumphant return to Capitol Hill—the once-ridiculed candidate now acknowledged as a visionary and treated with long-overdue respect. But the most remarkable moment of Gore’s hours of testimony in both houses may have been one in which he wasn’t even involved. It shined a light on both the changed atmosphere in Washington today, and the fear and loathing that that change is bringing on.

The most confrontational part of the day came when Gore was being questioned by Oklahoma senator, famed global warming skeptic and former chairman of the environment committee James Inhofe, in a battle of wits that was not exactly an equal match. Inhofe had trouble getting Gore to answer questions the way he wanted to, and kept interrupting him and complaining about the limited time he was given.

After some back and forth between Inhofe and Gore, the new chair of the committee, Barbara Boxer of California, put a hand on Inhofe’s arm and said, “I want to talk to you a minute, please.” After Boxer suggested that Inhofe give Gore the time to answer his questions, Inhofe replied, “Why don’t we do this: at the end, you can have as much time as you want to answer all the questions...” Boxer then interrupted: “No, that isn’t the rule. You’re not making the rules. You used to when you did this,” she said, holding up the chair’s gavel. “Elections have consequences. So I make the rules.”

Boxer spoke with a particular kind of authority: not angry, not loud, but unmistakably firm. There was no doubt who was in charge in that room. You could almost see the steam coming out of Inhofe’s ears, not only because he had been deprived of his power, but because he was deprived of it by a woman. She even held up the gavel, the symbol of that power, and practically taunted him with it. Freud couldn’t have scripted it much better.
....snip....

One can’t avoid noticing that as a group, conservative media figures are not exactly secure in their masculinity. Forever promoting war when they avoided military service themselves and doubling over to protect their tender parts every time a strong woman appears on their television screens, it’s no wonder they are so impressed by politicians who may not be real men but know how to present a convincing facsimile of manliness.

Much of the audience that tunes in to the corps of overcompensating pretend macho men is just as insecure about their manhood, ready to cast a manly, masculine vote lest anyone raise an eyebrow at their choice for president. That doesn’t mean that Hillary Clinton—or any female presidential candidate, for that matter—can’t win. But if she goes around holding up any long, firm objects, a lot of guys’ heads might just explode. .......

The complete piece is at: http://www.tompaine.com/articles/2007/03/28/scaring_the_pants_off_men.php




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. And here I was expecting an article about the health benefits of kilts
Ah, well. :hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 07:16 AM
Response to Reply #1
11. Oh yeah, kilts are great for air circulation and stuff
to be sure...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. thanks for posting this article -read whole thing and the last sentence

had me lol in pleasure
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
3. Hee. I love it.
“Elections have consequences. So I make the rules.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. I wish Barbara Boxer were running, and not Hillary.
"Elections have consequences". That's my Senator! :patriot: :applause: :woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VelmaD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. this deserves
a :kick: back up to the top of the page.

Went and read the whole article...too fuckin' funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBHagman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
6. Definitely a must-read.
It was impossible not to get Freudian when Boxer held up that gavel the other week. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lizerdbits Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. Savage's comments
"The response in some quarters was unsurprising. Michael Savage, whose hateful rants are reportedly heard by 8 million radio listeners every day, hit the roof. Referring repeatedly to “foul-mouthed, foul-tempered women in high places bossing men around,” he opined that the image of a woman giving a man orders would lead to more terrorist attacks (or something like that—it was a little hard to follow)."

So that's why they hate us! I'll help defend America by shuttin up and stayin home. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. And don't you love
How we're "emboldening the enemy" if we acknowledge any of the legitimate concerns over aggressive American military and economic policies toward the Middle East? But when it comes to things like gender equity and gay rights, we need to capitulate to the sensibilities of Al Qaeda. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:15 AM
Response to Original message
9. Kick. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BoneDaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 07:07 AM
Response to Original message
10. Yes, it is comical to watch some
conservative men bristle when they need to acknowledge powerful women, but let's not turn this into a woman vs. man charade like so many of the men haters on this forum do daily.

Female power does not threaten me at all, I love strong women, but some of the radicals with agendas on this board are quite pitiful and act like the very men they despise.

WTG Nancy Pelosi. Imhofe is such an idiot, great to watch him get knocked down a peg.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gaspee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-31-07 06:48 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Oh please...
Radicals with an agenda? And what would that be? Is this like the homosexual agenda the right wing likes to go on about? Asking people not to call women bitches and whores isn't exactly a radical agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-04-07 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. you know it
any criticism of men is now "radicals with an agenda"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melnjones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-03-07 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. did you even read the whole article?
seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-03-07 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
14. this deserves a KICK!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-03-07 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
15. White men gave a 25 %-age point edge to Bush over Kerry
Edited on Tue Apr-03-07 07:53 PM by spooky3
That is the most disturbing part of the commentary, IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC