Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Poll: More Americans Want "General Pelosi," Not The Commander In Chief, To Dictate Troop Levels

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-15-07 12:27 PM
Original message
Poll: More Americans Want "General Pelosi," Not The Commander In Chief, To Dictate Troop Levels
http://electioncentral.tpmcafe.com/blog/electioncentral/2007/apr/15/poll_more_americans_want_congress_not_bush_to_dictate_troop_levels

Poll: More Americans Want "General Pelosi," Not The Commander In Chief, To Dictate Troop Levels
By Greg Sargent | bio

Here's a key number from this weekend's CBS poll that deserves lots more attention -- because it suggests that Americans just aren't buying the GOP line that they should be put off by Congress' withdrawal timelines because they constitute an unprecedented Congressional "micromanaging" of the war.

Here, for instance, is Karl Rove speaking last night to a GOP gathering in Seattle:

Rove's harshest comments came in regard to the Democrats' plans for Iraq. He ridiculed House Speaker Nancy Pelosi for her trip to Syria, saying her party is "mandating failure" in Iraq.

"You know, the troops do not need General Pelosi trying to run the war from Capitol Hill," he said.


Oooooooo, scary! Rove has got the Dems' number! Run for your lives!

Sorry, but it looks as if the public just might rather have "General Pelosi" and other Dem Congressional leaders calling the shots on troop levels than the Commander in Chief himself. Or so this number in the CBS poll suggests:

Currently, President Bush and Congress disagree about what to do about U.S. troop levels in Iraq. Who do you think should have the final say about troop levels in Iraq, the President or Congress?

President: 44%
Congress: 49%


The poll also finds that an astonishing 67 percent of respondents think Congress should either allow funding only with a withdrawal timeline (58%) or cut off funding completely (9%).

Hang tough, Dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-15-07 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. How come when Hastert was speaker
he was allowed to do any damn thing he pleased. You did not hear the republicans yelling and screaming about what he did. A lot of it was outrageous as hell and partisan as could be, like holding votes open hours and hours longer than rules allowed. Adding amendments that were not voted on. Did you hear cons protest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-16-07 02:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Because of who owns big media. They choose what to focus on. (nt)
Edited on Mon Apr-16-07 02:04 AM by w4rma
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-15-07 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. Great!! Someone Needs to
"micromanage" this bushmisbegotten War On IRaq!

Like Al Gore would have micromanaged his Presidency if he were allowed to take his rightful place and there would have been NO 9/11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClayZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-15-07 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. K and R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC