Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush tells Pelosi Syria attacks were State Dept.’s fault

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-20-07 07:41 AM
Original message
Bush tells Pelosi Syria attacks were State Dept.’s fault
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/04/20/bush-tells-pelosi-syria-criticism-was-state-depts-fault/

Bush tells Pelosi Syria attacks were State Dept.’s fault.

“House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) told colleagues yesterday that she was incredulous after President Bush pulled her aside at the end of a meeting Wednesday and told her he did not criticize her recent trip to Syria. After all, Bush and other senior administration officials and top Republicans had slammed the speaker publicly for meeting in Damascus with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. But in a private meeting with Democratic lawmakers yesterday, Pelosi said Bush told her in an unsolicited comment that it was actually the State Department that criticized her.”

Hmmm....

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/19/AR2007041902356.html?nav=rss_politics

Differing Tales of a White House Encounter

By Michael Abramowitz and Lois Romano
Washington Post Staff Writers
Friday, April 20, 2007; Page A29

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) told colleagues yesterday that she was incredulous after President Bush pulled her aside at the end of a meeting Wednesday and told her he did not criticize her recent trip to Syria.

After all, Bush and other senior administration officials and top Republicans had slammed the speaker publicly for meeting in Damascus with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. But in a private meeting with Democratic lawmakers yesterday, Pelosi said Bush told her in an unsolicited comment that it was actually the State Department that criticized her.

According to two people who were at the meeting, the speaker said she told the president that she wanted to come back to the White House and give him an official briefing on the Syria trip and Bush quickly motioned for his staff to set up a meeting.

Bush spokeswoman Dana Perino, who was at the White House meeting Wednesday, took issue with Pelosi's account of the conversation in the Cabinet Room, which came at the end of talks largely devoted to funding the Iraq war. Perino said that Pelosi started the conversation about the Syria trip and that she never heard Bush back off his criticism.

"I was there the whole time. I don't recall him saying that," Perino said. "I know that he is critical of the trip, and what he says in private is the same as in public."

Pelosi spokesman Brendan Daly said the conversation took place privately, as an aside.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-20-07 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. Now what is he trying to pull?
Didn't State Dept help make arrangements for the trip?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-20-07 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I think what he's trying to say, is that the State Department's position
was that they did not agree with Pelosi's trip, and Bush repeated their opinion. Therefore, it wasn't Bush's fault. He was just repeating someone else's opinion.

Shit. I think this is how we got into Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-20-07 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Yes, the state dept. knew all about it. Dimson best check with his' brain'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-20-07 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. typical--always placing blame elsewhere
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-20-07 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
4. Who ya gonna believe??? Bad Pubs Bad Pubs...who ya gonna believe??
The one who has credibility.....BushCo got none so I gatta go with Nancy's version.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-20-07 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. you forgot Dana
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-20-07 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
7. So Perino is calling Pelosi a liar. Who is this non-elected skank again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-20-07 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
8. In other words, Bush* blames Condi.
Hope she's happy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-20-07 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. always protect the guy at the top.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-20-07 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
10. My first thought was that the Bush Junta is gonna come down like the WTC--
into its own footprint.

A straight-down and seemingly impossible demolition from the inside.

On the surface, Bush's aside to Pelosi was so juvenile as to be unbelievable--if we didn't know already that Bush is a case of arrested development. A 12 year old as president. Bad little boy trying to sidle up to the most powerful parent in the room, and get into her good graces, as protective cover for his many crimes. To have such a juvenile personality--and such a warped one--running the federal government is extremely hazardous to the people beneath him. He will betray any of them, and throw them to the wolves, in a cold minute, to save his own skin. They are all expendable. So, in order to curry favor with Grandmother Pelosi, he jettisons his own State Department and his loyal dog, Condi Rice. And it's interesting that--apart from possible personal ambition motives of Rice (vs. Pelosi), it probably wasn't the State Department so much as it was Dick Cheney and the NeoCon cabal who freaked over Pelosi visiting Syria. It's the sort of thing Condi would like to have done. And it certainly appears to have been a brilliant end run around Cheney's planned war with Iran. But it's hard to know whether to read Bush's remark to Pelosi in this way, as part of the dynamics of a regime with this very weak, rotten spot at its center--Bush; there could be a more cunning agenda in it, that is, Pelosi is now the power in the Middle East, and Bush wants to cut into her action, and find out what she knows, in order to protect Bush/Cheney and Oil Cartel interests and/or to stab her in the back. With everything else that is happening right now--scandal after scandal hitting the Bush Junta, and their evidently having fallen into disfavor with at least part of the Corporate Cabal (which I attribute to the success of the democracy movement in South America; the Bush Junta has "lost" South America as easy plundering ground)--I'm tending toward the WTC scenario for the Bushites: inner collapse, and crushing each other, as floor after floor "melts" into a pile of improbable steaming ruin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC