Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Letter from former marine sergeant to Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN 5th), RE: impeachment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-22-07 07:33 PM
Original message
Letter from former marine sergeant to Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN 5th), RE: impeachment
http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/?q=node/21625

20 April 2007

Rep. Keith Ellison
2100 Plymouth Ave. N.
Minneapolis, MN 55411

Mr. Ellison:

"The reason we are here is because we don't want to be good Germans, and we don't want you to be good Germans either," said Fletcher Dean of Calais, to wild applause from the packed room. The exchange drew enough bystanders, including legislators and media, to render the scheduled press conference unnecessary.” - April 17, 2007; Montpelier, VT; by Mary Elizabeth Fratini, Vermont Guardian.

I refuse to be a Good German. I don't want you to be a Good German either. I believe impeachment is the quickest and surest way of ending Unitary Executive Bush's state of perpetual war and bring our troops home. I believe it will go far to rectify the havoc the Bush administration has wrecked on this country and the world. The proofs of Bush's crimes are obvious and abundant. To doubt the self-evidence of theses truths is bootless. People are dying right now because of Bush's actions.

People are dying because of others' inaction. You do know that don't you? Do you want to be made responsible for this carnage by your inaction? Whatever your motives, you will be responsible. After the fact, before the fact, perpetrator, accessory; what does it matter? Your inaction will condemn you.

Representatives of Impeach for Peace, a group that I belong to and work hard for, will meet with you. I will tell you a truth you may not hear. They are meeting with you because you have failed to represent us. As a candidate you supported both peace and impeachment. Once elected you choose not to pursue the goals mandated by your constituents. And, you have yet to provide an adequate reason.

But your reasoning hardly matters. It is my reasoning that does. The reasons of one who spent nine years thanklessly serving the Constitution. Serving at a time, just after Vietnam, when native born Americans wouldn’t serve. Here are some of my reasons. They are quotes from Mahatma Gandhi.

An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor does truth become error because nobody will see it.

Agitation against every form of injustice is the breath of political life.

To think in terms of the political goal in every matter and at every step is to raise unnecessary dust.

I have sacrificed no principle to gain a political advantage.

The time for expedience is past, Mr. Ellison. There is no time for prevarication or uncertainly. The stakes are too high. Whatever good you hope to achieve by means other than impeachment will never be realized. George Bush will veto any objectionable legislation. And, in this case that means any reasonable legislation aimed to provide for the common good. But, even if doesn't kill your dream with a veto he; will pervert it with a signing statement. This slow process will continue until there is no hope left.

Therefore, George Bush and Dick Cheney must be impeached while impeachment is still constitutional. They must be impeached because they are the figurehead and brain of an enterprise that is antithetical to democracy, freedom and humanity.

I took an oath when I joined the military. You took a similar oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States when you assumed office. It’s been over thirty years since I took that oath. I haven’t forgotten it, nor have I forsworn myself. What about you?

As a member of Impeach for Peace, as a constituent, as a voter who put you in this office and as a simple fellow human being; I demand that you fulfill your oath to the utmost of your ability.

Semper pacificus,

Daniel I. Fearn
Former Sergeant of Marine Infantry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-22-07 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
This is just outstanding.

It says it all...

A clarion call if ever I heard one...

Let's get this ball rolling while we still have time and momentum...

Thank you!

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PDJane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-22-07 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thank you sir. EOM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echotrail Donating Member (347 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-22-07 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. Dang. Not enough posts to recommend.
But I can kick.

This is a great letter!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-22-07 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I recommended for you! And a kick to boot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echotrail Donating Member (347 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-22-07 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. why thank you!
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #3
16. Welcome to DU! I think a bunch of us will be happy to recommend
for you by proxy. My regret is that I have only one recommendation to give for my country.

Glad to have you with us! Now get to work.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echotrail Donating Member (347 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #16
20. Thanks!
I'm planning to take part in this:
http://volunteerforchange.org/event/details/958
We're going to spell out "impeach" with our canoes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geardaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. Is that Lake Calhoun?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echotrail Donating Member (347 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. yep!
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #20
31. Way cool! Hope you get lots of coverage!
If you have a way to add photos here (I'm a complete technodolt, so I wouldn't have the faintest idea how), please do.

Thanks for your activism, too, btw!

:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echotrail Donating Member (347 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. I will watch for pics that I can nab and post
but I plan to be on the water. Watch for "Kayakbiker," a great local photographer who covers most of the protests here (and posts a lot at dkos and sometimes at DU) since he will likely take some shots.

Spring has finally arrived here and it should be a great time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-22-07 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. I was never good for
this regime. Thank you, babylonsister..and I'm thanking, Daniel I. Fearn, Former Sergeant of Marine Infantry for writing it!

This man gets it.."Therefore, George Bush and Dick Cheney must be impeached while impeachment is still constitutional."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrispyQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-22-07 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. Error: You've already recommended that thread.
:thumbsup:

k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-22-07 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
8. Excellent. "Semper Pacificus" is my new motto.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-22-07 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
9. Very good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lugnut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-22-07 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
10. K&R
If I could recommend this topic five times I would.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
11. Thats right.. Bring them home. Now.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClayZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
12. Thank you! K and R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 05:53 AM
Response to Original message
13. "People are dying because of others' inaction."
We need to remind our elected representatives of this at every opportunity. The blood is on more than George's hands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
14. Kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Senator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
15. The Sergeant Drills the Right Message: Inaction Has Consequence Too
Do you ACT to stop the ongoing torture and war cimes -- or do you condone it?

Only Impeachment ... is a substantive ACT.

It is our ONLY moral, patriotic option.

--

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pat_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
17. A good time to call Ellison's office (an impeachment candidate now blathering excuses)
Edited on Mon Apr-23-07 10:16 AM by pat_k
He's a member of the Judiciary Committee. You don't need to be a constitutient to contact him. Just tell the office you are contacting him in that capacity and want to speak to his judiciary LA.

Will Ellison pursue impeachment? Not for now, he says
Impeachment backers want him to use his spot on the Judiciary Committee to pursue action against the president.

By Rob Hotakainen, Star Tribune
January 25, 2007

WASHINGTON - If campaign talk means anything, there would be at least one sure vote on the House Judiciary Committee to impeach President Bush if the matter ever came up.

It would come from freshman Democratic Rep. Keith Ellison, the Minneapolis lawyer and former state legislator who got a plum assignment when he was named to the storied House panel this month.

At a rally in Loring Park in October, Ellison said Bush "has been running amok" and needs to be reined in: "There is one way that you can truly hold this president accountable, and it's impeachment."

But for the time being anyway, Ellison seems in no hurry to push the matter. "My opinions really have not changed over time, but the circumstances that I'm in have," he said. He said that he's "a step before impeachment," adding that his emphasis as he learns the ropes in Congress is on a broader range of human and civil rights issues.

Ellison's appointment to the Judiciary Committee, which has jurisdiction over impeachment, has brought applause from the president's fiercest critics. Democratic leaders have made clear they don't intend to move to impeach Bush, and critics are disappointed, hoping Ellison will provide a loud voice to ignite their lonely crusade. Pro-impeachment groups plan to press their case for impeachment when they join anti-war demonstrators for a huge rally Saturday in Washington.

"All of us are thrilled that Mr. Ellison is in Congress and is on the Judiciary Committee," said David Swanson, Washington director of ImpeachPAC. "Keith Ellison, I think it's safe to say, has gone further toward impeachment than any other member of Congress."

Ellison, who introduced a pro-impeachment resolution in the Minnesota Legislature last year, received a $1,000 contribution from ImpeachPAC and is the group's only endorsed congressional candidate who won election in 2006.

Mikael Rudolph of Minneapolis, co-founder of a group called ImpeachforPeace.org, wasn't aware of Ellison's appointment until he was contacted by a reporter. "That's fabulous!" he said.

Impeachment backers say that Ellison has only been on the job for three weeks and that it would be unfair to jump on him for not moving aggressively on impeachment. But Swanson said he'll be "extremely disappointed" if Ellison has done nothing after a month or two.

At the rally in Minneapolis, Ellison said it was time to "send the message to this Bush character that we're not going to have it anymore." He said that impeachment "would be a major undertaking and it would dominate the headlines for a long time" but that it was the right course.

Since taking office on Jan. 4, Ellison has not made impeachment an issue. Last week he joked that he's still learning where the bathrooms and cafeterias are located. But he said that he's backing proposals to fully investigate Bush and that "a little more homework needs to be done" before Congress can move to impeach.

"I'm a lawyer, you know. I don't think due process is just for some people, it's for all people, including the president."

Rep. John Kline, R-Minn., said Ellison's views won't matter because House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., has already said impeachment is "off the table." In all fairness to the gentleman from Minneapolis, he is a freshman member," Kline said. "I understand that he was endorsed by ImpeachPAC and supported financially. ... He probably feels that he made a commitment and he's got to make some noise, but so what?"

Swanson said that all members of Congress take an oath to uphold the Constitution and that Pelosi is abandoning her duty by refusing to move forward on impeachment. He said that "there are clearly dozens of Congress members who understand the need for impeachment" but that members fear they'll be attacked by the news media if they pursue it. He said that it's fine to investigate Bush but that a House member has to "cut to the chase" and introduce articles of impeachment.

Ellison said Congress must take its time. "These things are fluid," he said. "You know, these things have to take shape. ... The bottom line is we're going to have to let this thing run its proper and due course."

Ellison, the first black congressman from Minnesota and the first Muslim in Congress, said he wants to use his appointment to advance "a progressive agenda" and work on a broad range of issues, including a ban on racial profiling and beefed-up community-oriented policing. He said he also wants to speed up the immigration process, protect privacy and intellectual property rights and help pass a law that would make it illegal for states to impose lifetime voting bans on felons.

"I get to pursue my passion for civil and human rights," Ellison said.

Rob Hotakainen is a correspondent in the Star Tribune Washington Bureau: 202-383-0009


There's nothing "fluid" about the fact that the USA is now a War Criminal nation that spies on its own citizens without warrant or "due process" -- and will remain so until the nation impeaches Bush and Cheney (even if it must be done "in absentia" after they have left office.)

Impeachment is not a legal/judicial process. It is a POLITICAL process. We vested the power in Congress, not the Courts for a reason. It is up to the People through their Representatives to withdraw their consent. If Ellison believes Bush has "run amok," immediately introducing articles of impeachment is the "due process" dictated by his oath to "support and defend." There are NO legalisms that can trump his judgement.

ONLY Impeachment can say "we're not going to have it anymore." Bush and Cheney have proven over, and over, and over that NOTHING short of impeachment can even make them blink.

Bush and Cheney are intentionally committing their crimes in plain sight to advance their relentless campaign to transform the Office of the President into a unitary authoritarian executive with unlimited power. They have made the case for impeachment against themselves. There is NOTHING to investigate. There is no "homework" to be done. Like squatters, the outlaws in the White House are laying claim to unconstitutional power through openly hostile possession. They do something unequivocally forbidden under our Constitution, publicly declare it is not forbidden, and dare Members of Congress to stop them. The congressional oath is an individual oath. Every day that Ellison refuses to impeach he legitimizes the fascist fantasy that the American presidency is vested with unlimited power.

Time to wake up to reality and act Mr. Ellison.

http://journals.democraticunderground.com/pat_k">Get Up; Stand Up!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echotrail Donating Member (347 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. Impeachment activists met with him this weekend:
http://impeachforpeace.org/impeach_bush_blog/?p=1361
Exclusive for ImpeachforPeace.org by Mikael Rudolph

Four members of ImpeachforPeace.org met with the Honorable Representative Keith Ellison (D-MN 5th) in his Minneapolis offices Saturday morning, April 22nd to discuss the impeachment of President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney.

Early in the meeting, Ellison made clear that his opinion hasn't changed since he introduced a Resolution for the impeachment of President Bush as a Minnesota State Legislator by saying: "Impeachment should be on the table".

In Washington D.C. attending sessions of Congress during the week, Ellison regularly travels home to be with his wife Kim and four children each weekend, taking some time to meet with his constituents as well.

Running a bit late, Ellison explained that he had just gotten a haircut because he "wanted to look good for our meeting", turning his head side to side to show off his barber's work. One member of IFP quipped: "It was well worth the wait".

As everyone settled into their chairs and the laughter subsided, the mood quickly grew more serious as the topic of Ellison's vote for the Veterans’ Health & Iraq War Accountability Supplemental was discussed, which some in the local and national peace movement felt was a betrayal of Ellison's commitment to seeking an immediate end to the Iraq War. A sharply critical letter from an IFP member not present was read and a framed graphic called "The Impeachment Casualty Candle" was set up on the table as a reminder to everyone present of the ultimate price already paid by so many of our troops and the high stakes still facing many American families, not to mention Iraqi families:

Ellison heard the criticism and handled it well, acknowledging and empathizing with the frustrations and anger of those who want the war over and our troops home immediately yet he made it clear that many in the Peace Movement had communicated to him that they understood and supported the strategy of confronting and isolating what even the President's own Intelligence Agencies have identified as failed Iraq policies by passing a bill with a plan to end the war at some point.

Ellison called House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) who had gathered just enough of a consensus among fellow House Democrats to pass the measure, "a remarkable leader" who is quickly proving herself to be a gifted "cat herder" of the various caucuses in the Democratic Party.

The topic quickly shifted to impeachment, with Rep. Ellison affirming that he is "with the impeachment movement", yet making clear that in order for him to consider supporting impeachment hearings, the charges spoken into the Congressional Record must be strongly grounded in verifiable facts and evidence as well as understood by and backed by the majority of the American people.

Not eager to be assailed by the radical right's bevy of partisan media shills as "the poster child for loonie leftists", Ellison said that the most important thing he and his fellow members of Congress need from constituents is that they "keep the drumbeat up" for impeachment.

Ellison named fellow Representative Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) as "a good friend", saying "we talk every day" during the week in Washington. With Kucinich reputedly poised to introduce Articles of Impeachment against Vice President Dick Cheney this week, Ellison was measured in his commitment to join Kucinich. He made clear that he was supportive of the idea, but not if it only becomes a symbolic gesture. Ellison is only interested in seeing impeachment proceedings actually becoming a reality.

Stressing that he had not yet seen what specific charges Kucinich is intending to bring up against the Vice President, Ellison, formerly a criminal defense attorney, seemed as committed to guaranteeing the habeas corpus for Cheney that the Vice President regularly denies others.

Looking at his blackberry, Ellison said "maybe I'll give Dennis a call this weekend".

Noting that he has an activist's heart, when asked what efforts and strategies in support of impeachment might be most effective, Ellison suggested sending John Nichol's book The Genius of Impeachment, which he had read and appreciated, to members of Congress, starting with those on the House Judiciary Committee. ImpeachforPeace.org is listed in Nichol's book among the resources in Appendix 3, page 209.

Five filled out and signed Do-It-Yourself Impeachment Memorials were given to the Representative. Ellison had not heard of the DIY Impeachment and he was very interested in hearing that the Jefferson's Manual, which is an integral part of the rules of the U.S. House of Representatives, allows for the initiation of articles of impeachment by an individual citizen.

The following Democratic HJC members were identified by Ellison as pivotal "swing" votes who may need a strong and clear message from their constituents and other citizens in order to support any impeachment push:

Hon. Jerrold Nadler
(D) New York, 8th

Hon. Howard L. Berman
(D) California, 28th

Hon. Zoe Lofgren
(D) California, 16th

Hon. Linda T. Sánchez
(D) California, 39th

The 71 members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus as well as the 73 Out of Iraq Caucus members are among those more likely to be ready to join Kucinich' desire to get to the bottom of Vice President and former Halliburton CEO Cheney's true motivations for pushing for the invasion and occupation of Iraq. Cheney's wishes can be traced back at least as far as 1998 when he was a co-signer of the Project for a New American Century's document: Rebuilding America's Defenses.

Many Democrats are in both caucuses, including Rep. Ellison.

The Lies and False Intelligence Leading up to the Invasion of Iraq in March of 2003 will most likely be at the crux of Kucinich' charges, because there is ample evidence as laid out in the linked article by IFP's Jodin Morey, but also because the country has grown increasingly unsupportive of President Bush, and distrustful of the reasons we were given as justification for going into Iraq.

As low as Bush's approval rating has plummeted, Mr. Cheney's support from the American public has wallowed even deeper.

Asked about the possibility of impeachment actually occuring, Ellison immediately replied "yes, it can work", but noted that by August all eyes will be looking forward to the next election cycle and by then the window of opportunity for justice and accountability for the Bush Administration may have passed. He made clear that the public must be informed enough to see impeachment as warranted and necessary, but then act on that knowledge by communicating their desires for accountability through impeachment to Congress. This must take place to such a degree that Speaker Pelosi and others have no choice but to honor the wishes of our nation's citizens and to allow impeachment to go forward.

Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA) of whom Ellison also expressed great respect, was named as being a pivotal figure in deciding whether the numerous investigations of the Bush Administration, now totalling over a hundred, were collectively revealing enough evidence to warrant the initiation of impeachment hearings. Any efforts to inform Rep. Waxman that impeachment is warranted and desired by the American people was encouraged.

Representative Ellison generously gave more than twice the time alloted by his schedulers, but then had to leave to attend an afternoon event one of his children was involved in.

As he drove east on Plymouth Avenue past the IFP members chatting in the parking lot, he beeped the horn on his economy car and waved, eyes remaining forward on the road. Two stickers were affixed to the rear bumper, one an AM950 Air America Radio red, white and blue emblem. The other was green but none of those standing in the parking lot were able to positively identify it as it faded into the distance.

The consensus from the group? Probably 'a Wellstone'.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudsue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. Saturday morning was April 21, NOT the 22nd (Sunday)
But that's a good post, nevertheless!

:kick::kick::kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pat_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #21
29. Glad to hear it . . . but it doesn't sound like. . .
Edited on Mon Apr-23-07 03:17 PM by pat_k
. . .they contradicted his rationalizations. Hope that impression is wrong.

For example:

On extracting ourselves from Iraq
Only impeachment can possibly change the dynamics and make it possible for extract ourselves from Iraq. Anything short of impeachment is nothing more than complaint and impotent gesture. They are doing nothing but demonstrating weakness as they allow the Bush-Cheney steamroll them. One cannot claim to be anti-war if they are unwilling to take up the ONLY "lethal" weapon in the Congressional arsenal right now.

On needing strong grounds for impeachment
The grounds for impeachment couldn't possibly be stronger. As pointed out in my post above, Bush and Cheney condemn themselves with their own acts and public statements. The case is made. All that is left is to pick one of a half-dozen intolerable crimes against our constitutional democracy and make the case in impeachment hearings.

On Democratic fears that "they'll" call us names
Fear of "backlash" and name calling is irrational given the polls. For example, Newsweek found that 58% want the Bush presidency over NOW. Before the election they found that 51% wanted impeachment to be a priority.

Any damage the Party could possibly suffer as a consequence of reactionary right-wing name calling would be more than worth the enormous political benefits. Impeaching Bush and Cheney would solve the Number 1 and Number 2 problems that are destroying the Party -- i.e., the perception that they are weak and their inability to define overarching principles that inspire. Impeachment is the ultimate demonstration of Congressional power. Impeaching to enforce the most treasured dictates of our Constitution demonstrates strength and commitment to those principles and define Democrats as champions of the People's Government and the Constitution. Pretty heady stuff.

Limiting themselves to pea-shooter half-measures incapable of forcing Bush and Cheney to do anything they don't want to, when they have a gun in their pocket that IS capable of stopping them, just confirms the image that Democrats are weak.

On their fears that impeachment will "distract"
Don't they want to distract Bush and Cheney from advancing their fascist agenda?

On their fears that impeachment will hurt their chances of winning elections
The opposite is true. Standing and fighting for principle ALWAYS benefits leaders who do so. Failure to fight when principle demands it hurts. They need look no farther than the leadership's failure to fight against the Authorization to Use Military Force.

Fighting for impeachment is the best thing a candidate can do for themselves. By putting the charges "on the table" they force Republicans Members of Congress and candidates to respond/defend. The choices that Republicans will face won't be very attractive to them. They can evade and look squirrelly. They can add their voice to the chorus condemning Bush and Cheney. Or they can publicly defend torture and the fascist fantasy that the Office of the President has absolute power to nullify acts of Congress at will (e.g., like McCain's anti-torture amendment). With so many Republicans already scrambling over each other to "distance themselves" Bush, Bush and Cheney are unlikely to find many defenders.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
av8rdave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
18. Outstanding! So well said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
19. He should have been a senior officer.
Edited on Mon Apr-23-07 10:08 AM by KCabotDullesMarxIII
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
24. "must be impeached while impeachment is still constitutional"
that's a chilling reminder of what we are up against.
excellent letter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
26. Daniel I. Fearn
Brave man and true patriot.

:patriot:

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
27. Semper Fi Daniel Fearn!
:patriot: Excellent letter!

Thanks for the thread babylonsister
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ptvet Donating Member (215 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
28. Another K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SalviaBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
30. WOW! K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC