Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bloomberg poised for third-party campaign

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-15-07 09:38 AM
Original message
Bloomberg poised for third-party campaign
Source: WashTimes

New York Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg is prepared to spend an unprecedented $1 billion of his own $5.5 billion personal fortune for a third-party presidential campaign, personal friends of the mayor tell The Washington Times.

"He has set aside $1 billion to go for it," confided a long-time business adviser to the Republican mayor. "The thinking about where it will come from and do we have it is over, and the answer is yes, we can do it."

Another personal friend and fellow Republican said in recent days that Mr. Bloomberg, who is a social liberal and fiscal conservative, has "lowered the bar" and upped the ante for a final decision on making a run.

The mayor has told close associates he will make a third-party run if he thinks he can influence the national debate and has said he will spend up to $1 billion. Earlier, he told friends he would make a run only if he thought he could win a plurality in a three-way race and would spend $500 million -- or less than 10 percent of his personal fortune.

Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20070515-123142-3314r.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-15-07 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. Barf!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
natrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-15-07 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. what's his deal? a crook like the rest of the thugs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-15-07 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. A long time Dem who switched parties
to run for Mayor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-15-07 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
3. Great!
Split the GOP vote! About time they got Nadered for a change. If by any chance he wins, I'd rather have him than a Ron Paul or even McCain. But pulling centrist Reps away and making it even MORE likely that they will nominate some theocratic loon who will turn off the vast majority of undecideds is hardly a bad thing is it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-15-07 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
4. To me the beauty of this is Bloomberg blatantly trying to buy
the presidency. Maybe that will wake a few people up the the presidency has for the most part a prize for the highest bidder. And the winner now gets to impose his or her ideas of utopia on a an undesirous public.
If this doesn't spur some action, maybe someday it will gain a spot as evidence that any pretense at real Democracy was over forever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smarmie Doofus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-15-07 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. It won't.
>>>To me the beauty of this is Bloomberg blatantly trying to buy

the presidency. Maybe that will wake a few people up the the presidency has for the most part a prize for the highest bidder.>>>

He blatantly bought the NYC media... the source of much of this moronic 'White House' buzz, BTW... and then the mayoralty. No reason he can't buy the WH other than..... it might cost more?

In any case, if you can capture the media, the peeps will never wake-up.

His mayoralty is sub-mediocre. Used to be there was no place to live. Now there's no place to live AND no schools to send your kids to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-15-07 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
5. That should secure it for the Dems in 08
Edited on Tue May-15-07 09:56 AM by zbdent
(not joking)

Edited to add:

Of course, you'll get decades of "Well, fill-in-the-blank-Democrat didn't 'win' in 2008 ... he didn't get the clear majority ..."

like they did all through Clinton's, because of Perot ... but we have to "get over" Gore "losing" ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC