wyldwolf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-17-07 08:39 AM
Original message |
Sounds like a presidential speech to me |
blm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-17-07 08:45 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Agreed - now DNC should come out and pound Giuliani for cheating on his wives. |
|
Edited on Thu May-17-07 08:46 AM by blm
Isn't that the best way to support a major speech from a Dem candidate? http://www.thenation.com/blogs/capitalgames?pid=1850
|
wyldwolf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-17-07 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. What I posted was not actually a speech, and the DNC was correct in pounding Bush's guard service |
|
Why is it, blm, that you (attempt) to turn every post into some sort of pissing match with the Clintons?
|
blm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-17-07 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. Oh - did McAuliffe change his name? |
wyldwolf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-17-07 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. no, and you haven't changed your tune, either. |
blm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-17-07 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. Truth and facts don't change. So the song remains the same |
|
until they do. "Somebody posts factually inaccurate information? The answer is simple: Post a response and set the record straight." -Skinner- http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=3255877&mesg_id=3255901
|
wyldwolf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-17-07 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. this is the part where you talk about Clinton, cocaine, zombies, and such... |
blm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-17-07 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. No - that is YOUR preferred exaggeration used to distract from the basic facts. |
wyldwolf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-17-07 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
13. Did you pick up Falwell's anti-Clinton "cocaine conspiracy" tapes this week? |
karynnj
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-17-07 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
10. How dare YOU imply that Clinton had anything to do with zombies? |
|
Why are you baiting BLM - who to my knowledge never wrote anything about Clinton and zombies.
|
wyldwolf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-17-07 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. well, that gets my vote for most hysterical post of the day! |
karynnj
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-17-07 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
14. I suggest that this entire sub tread deserves that award |
|
Edited on Thu May-17-07 10:44 AM by karynnj
It is pretty transparent what you are attempting to do - and BLM just hit it on the nail. There are utterly bizarre inane lies about the Clintons - I never even heard about the Zombies - as there are about Gore, Teresa and John Kerry, and Obama - to name just a few. And just as there are valid questions that Edwards, Obama and others have to answer, there are questions Hillary may have to repond to - but they don't involve Zombies.
|
wyldwolf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-17-07 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #14 |
15. well you can thank blm for that one - as usual. |
janx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-17-07 08:48 AM
Response to Original message |
2. It's a lot more important than even that, but |
Clark2008
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-17-07 08:57 AM
Response to Original message |
4. Well, I wish someone would run I could get behind. |
|
I really am so disillusioned by nearly everyone just now, except for maybe Kucinich, who can't win.
Sigh.
|
karynnj
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-17-07 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
I would love to feel enthusiastic about a candidate - in the past I've been impressed with multiple possible candidates and the difficulty was picking which one.
I do wish Gore would jump in, but all signs are he isn't. Has Clark been more definate either way. Also, off topic, is Clark aligned involved with the Kerry/Hart/Zinni think tank on national security?
|
Adelante
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-17-07 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
16. I was wondering the same about that think tank |
|
I haven't heard anything, but thought it's such a good fit.
|
SaveElmer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-17-07 11:09 AM
Response to Original message |
17. Al Gore is a great guy...but the ONLY scenario I where I see him running... |
|
If there is an enormous groundswell of support based on voter dissatisfaction with the current candidates.
In fact the opposite is true...
Polls consistently show Democratic voters are very happy with this field of candidates, the last poll I saw had it at 60%. Pretty astounding given the usual cynicism politicians are greeted with.
There just isn't a widespread groundswell of support for Gore to get in the race...
And for those around here insisting Hillary drop out because her negatives are higher than the other candidates should be discouraging it as well, Al's negatives are about what Hillary's are currently...
There is just no compelling reason for Al to get in, or for him to believe he would win if he did...
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat May 04th 2024, 08:25 PM
Response to Original message |