Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hugely disappointed in Senator Jim Webb

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
PBass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 03:11 PM
Original message
Hugely disappointed in Senator Jim Webb
Webb voted against the Feingold-Reid bill yesterday. No idea how he's voting today, yet.

What happened to Webb's attitude about Congress "showing the president the way" out of Iraq (his rebuttal to Bush's SOTU)???

Webb is not my Senator but I did donate a bunch of money to his campaign.

WTF???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hijinx87 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. webb is a blue dog
other than not being whathisname, I never understood people's
love affair with the guy. and other than the war, he is wrong on
most everything else.

now, having said all that, he did kick whathisname's (I really
have forgotten his name) ass. that alone is worth a great deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. George Allen. Webb isn't too much to my tastes either but he's hugely better
than George Allen, who is a racist, and mean to boot. Not to mention being a fundamentalist.

I think everyone needs to step back and understand that we are better off now than a year ago, even though there have been bumps in the road.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. Blue dog from a red state who barely won against a complete racist.
What do you expect?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. Jim Webb
Here is a link to a post that has his reasoning...

He is my Senator...

I know the following...

1. Jim Webb is an expert in military and foreign policy...almost without parallel

2. Jim Webb is a straight talker...

3. Jim Webb doesn't play politics, and certainly would not do so with the lives of American soldiers..

Therefore I conclude that what he says is worth listening to and considering, and he very well may be correct in this situation...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Oh sorry...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. He is also a PNAC signatory.
Edited on Thu May-24-07 03:46 PM by Totally Committed
If he signed that document, who knows what he's really thinking or planning. Since I found that out I am having a problem trusting him, frankly.

http://www.king-george.biz/wst_page5.html

TC

P.S. Completely as an aside, as you can see, Sen. Schumer is a signatory as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LBJDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Fallacious
Webb signed only PNAC's Statement on the Defense of Taiwan. And I doubt that there's anything awful in it. Better a Taiwan supporter than a friend of the PRC tyrants eating up America's manufacturing base.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. I agree with what you've said, but I disagree that those that vote no on this
are playing politics with soldiers' lives. It's not wrong to refuse to support this bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. I didn't say that...nor do I think it
But to say that anyone that votes for it is therefore a "warmonger" or whatever term they choose to apply is not necessarily true either....applying that label to Jim Webb for example would be ludicrous
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Yes, I am with you on that. Many Dems of good conscience will end up voting for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. Like most Democrats in Congress, Webb never advocated immediate withdrawal
What many DUers seem to forget is that during last fall's campaign, most Democrats running for Congress challenged the conduct of the war and whether we should've ever gotten into it in the first place. But many, probably most, stayed clear of advocating immediate withdrawal. The fact that they're reluctant to go that route six months later is only a shock to those who weren't paying any attention or who want to believe what they want to believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
7. I personally trust Senator Webb to do his best for what is right for the
troops, since his own son is one of them. Perhaps his vote is the right one. Only time will tell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Exactly t he point I have been trying to make...
Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MODemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
8. Maybe he's still a republican
Bush is possibly the reason he came over to the Democratic side in the first place.:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. He said that he was a Republican...
Based on national security issues, but was always uncomfortable with Republican social and economic policy...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. Maybe you need to get some fresh air
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ncteechur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
18. He also has a son over there and I'm sure he doesn't want him to go without
supplies. If I had a son over there, I would vote for the supplemental to give the necessary supplies even if it was a bitter pill to swallow. Cut the guy some slack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hellbound-liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. He's my Senator too. I too agree that he votes in the best interests of the troops
However his son is not over there right now. He may be going back, but he's not there now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. His son came home (not sure if he has to go back). I saw a picture
of him with Webb on Raising Kaine.

Anyone know how he voted tonight?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hijinx87 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #21
34. I believe he voted "yea"

(a perhaps unnecessarily bitter comment follows)

not so opposed to it now that his son isn't over there
anymore . . . .

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
20. This may come as a surprise, but most Dems never supported immediate pullout
First, it's not realistic. We decide to leave tomorrow, it will probably still take a year to ship all the junk home. The sheer numbers are quite a problem.

Second, defunding the war isn't really all that popular. That's just a raw political reality. All conservative and competitive district Dems have to consider this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hijinx87 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. I seem to recall . . . .

that they got there in just a few months. why would pulling them
out take so much longer?

and control of both houses turned on the issue of the war; we won
because we oppose it. isn't that the real political reality?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. The public opposes the war, yes
We won because the American people want the troops to come home and because of Bush's horrendous failures in conducting the war. I'm not sure the public wants defunding, though. At least it hasn't looked that way, so far, from what I've seen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hijinx87 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. after much consideration . . .

I don't think there is an option to defunding.

we were elected to accomplish a very specific thing. I doubt the
american people would take exception with the means we chose to
employ in meeting our mandate.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #26
35. And you may be right, hijinx
What do you think of the idea of revoking the IWR?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hijinx87 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #35
38. I actually looked up the IWR in search of a loophole
it contains language at the end that requires bi-monthly reports to congress:


SEC. 4. REPORTS TO CONGRESS

(a) The President shall, at least once every 60 days, submit to the Congress a report on matters relevant to this joint resolution, including actions taken pursuant to the exercise of authority granted in section 2 and the status of planning for efforts that are expected to be required after such actions are completed, including those actions described in section 7 of Public Law 105-338 (the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998).


I am wondering if the regime can be declared in material breach of
the IWR, and then it simply be voided. it is probably not completely
legal, but it would provide acceptable political cover to our cowering
leadership to do what has to be done, since obviously the election wasn't
enough for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #38
40. Richardson, Clinton and Byrd
are trying to bring about something like this. It could be much simpler than defunding, it seems to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muffin1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
24. He's my Senator
Anyone who knows anything about George Allen should be THRILLED that he lost to Jim Webb.
Allen is a total racist - confederate flag in his office, and on his belt buckle. A NOOSE hung in his office as a symbol of JUSTICE! Not to mention the "Maccaca" incident.
He has no use for Geneva Convention rules, nor habeas corpus. On top of all that, he is one of those fundamental "Christians".
I believe that Jim Webb is generally a good man. He served his country very heroically in Vietnam. He served as Secretary of the Navy. He has vast military and diplomacy experience. He was against this stupid ass war FROM THE BEGINNING. AND he has told off Chimpy on a number of occasions.
Think I'll stand by Jim a little longer!
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hijinx87 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #24
27. Webb's voting record
a little blurb from congressional quarterly.


So far, the voting records of three Democrats who unseated conservative Republican senators in Republican-leaning states last fall have set them apart from the rest of the Senate Democratic Caucus. While other Democratic freshmen have voted with a majority of the members of their party more than 95 percent of the time, Webb, Tester and Claire McCaskill of Missouri more often have gone their own way, mainly on budget and ethics issues.

According to a Congressional Quarterly analysis, Tester and Webb have voted with a majority of Democrats about 90 percent of the time. McCaskill has voted in line with a majority of her party on about 87 percent of the Senate’s roll call votes on which a majority of Democrats are aligned against a majority of Republicans.

The only Senate Democrats with lower party unity scores are Ben Nelson of Nebraska, Mary L. Landrieu of Louisiana and Evan Bayh of Indiana, all of whom cultivate moderate images while representing Republican-leaning states.
.
.
.
Webb — whose state is home to Philip Morris USA, the world’s largest cigarette maker — was one of four Democrats on March 23 who opposed a non-binding amendment to the budget that called for a cigarette tax increase to provide more money for the State Children’s Health Insurance Program. Webb said a cigarette tax would hurt the poor.

http://public.cq.com/docs/cqt/news110-000002487929.html


I remember saying before the election that we were likely to have a severe
case of buyer's remorse over some of the people we were putting into office.

all I heard in response was the sound of crickets chipring.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muffin1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. Not saying he's perfect
Only much better than the alternative, in my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hijinx87 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. that was the reasoning before the mid-terms, as well.

"he is better than what we have now". true.

but is he actually good? I think the jury
is still out, but this guy is just not our natural
ally.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muffin1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #29
31.  All we CAN do on election day
is TRY to pick who we think is the best person given our choices. Between the two I had to choose from, I really couldn't have done anything differently!:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hijinx87 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. you are right, of course

but that wasn't really my point. I was just saying that I
didn't expect much more from him than we are getting right
now.

the euphoria about him was just difficult to understand.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #32
39. a lot of the euphoria was based on (1) he's not george allen and (2) we control committees
with his election giving the Democrats a one vote majority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #27
30. Yes....but think of Maccaca and George Allen. It could be worse....
with VA as conservative as it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #27
36. I don't have buyer's remorse at all. Webb is a WORLD better
than Allen. But he is senator of a red state (presidential elections), and is going to have to vote that way accordingly. I also had no illusions about his views on Vietnam. Yes, he was opposed to the Iraq War, but make no mistake -- he despises hippies, anti-war types, etc., and he's opposed to getting out of Iraq by de-funding.

I'm being realistic here. This is who he is, and how he will vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jimmy Hoops Donating Member (17 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #36
37. I from VA and voted for the guy,
but he's a pretty conservative, hawkish Democrat. Better than Allen but who isn't?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LBJDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #27
41. McCaskill, Tester, and Webb are the future of the party
They're the protectionist wing of the party. I support them completely. If they vote like Republicans sometimes, it's not on issues critical to the economic well-being of American workers.

In fact, I hope Webb runs for president in 2016. He'll have my full support then.

And I really don't think voting against a cigarette tax is a big deal. It's essentially a sales tax on a good that's more or less a basic good for a lot of blue-collar people. If that aligns with Philip Morris, so what. I can think of worse companies to be in the pocket of (e.g. Clinton being in the pocket of Morgan Stanley and Tata Consultancy).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hijinx87 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #41
42. I certainly hope not. n/t

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orangepeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #27
45. Would Allen, Burns and Talent have voted with the Dems 87% of the time?
It doesn't make sense to be remorseful that you didn't buy what was never on the market. The ones we "bought" are a hell of a lot better than the available alternatives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU GrovelBot  Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
33. ## PLEASE DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ##
==================
GROVELBOT.EXE v4.0
==================



This week is our second quarter 2007 fund drive. Democratic
Underground is a completely independent website. We depend on donations
from our members to cover our costs. Thank you so much for your support.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LBJDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
43. I can't believe what I'm reading here
Senator Webb is a godsend for the Democratic Party. The only senators who rival Webb in being opposed to the tyranny of Wall Street via free trade are probably Dorgan and Brown.

Is everyone here overlooking that? Do all of you realize what kinds of pressure Wall Street puts on politicians so that they vote in favor of free trade agreements?

Are you even aware that the Democratic Party is in the process of betraying the worker on trade once again (http://www.thenation.com/doc/20070604/editors)?

To hell with all your "he's not a real Democrat" bulls***. I don't give a flying f*** what he calls himself or whether he was in the Reagan administration, but if he's for helping food on the table for working class Americans, then he's got my support.

If you marginalize Webb, you'll be shooting yourselves in the foot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hijinx87 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #43
44. he may be a "godsend" to YOUR democratic party.
Edited on Fri May-25-07 11:18 AM by hijinx87
he is nothing special to mine.

I merely tolerate him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
46. How did he vote yesterday?
Is there a list somewhere? thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hijinx87 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. yea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. thanks for that link!
:hi:

At least one of my senators did the right thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC