kansasblue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-24-07 11:21 PM
Original message |
First minimum wage increase in more than a decade. |
|
Passed tonight: The first minimum wage increase in more than a decade. The current federal wage floor of $5.15 an hour will go to $7.25 in three installments of 70 cents.
And Democrats also insisted on a variety of provisions to aid milk producers, American and Continental Airlines and rural counties hurt by the falloff in revenues from timber harvested on federal lands.
|
Captain Hilts
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-24-07 11:22 PM
Response to Original message |
1. We can't subsidize Amtrak, but it's okay to give money to AA and CAirlines. nt |
pnwmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-24-07 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. I think we should be helping Amtrak. |
Captain Hilts
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-25-07 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
11. I absolutely think we should subsidize Amtrak. But every year they argue over a pitance... |
|
for Amtrak and write HUGE checks for the airlines and to subsidize airports in small cities. If you know how much you paid per ticket every time someone lands in Utica, NY or Johnstown PA...
|
kansasblue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-24-07 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. that did seem a little strange. Auto industry is hurting too. nt |
Dr.Phool
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-24-07 11:25 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Well whoopty fucking do. |
|
Why did they attach it to a bill that will leave a lot of people dead and maimed?
|
pnwmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-24-07 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
5. Because that made it veto proof. |
|
Kennedy has been trying to get one passed for years, but the Bush administration has always opposed it.
|
nadinbrzezinski
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-25-07 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
why did Kennedy vote against it?
Try to figure this out ok
(He knowns something many don't realize, the bill is a poison pill and minimum wage was the sugar coat to make the poison taste better)
|
kansasblue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-24-07 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
6. technical they were seperate. But the deal was made to get |
|
them both passed..... war funding. Domestic funding.
|
sandnsea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-24-07 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. That really isn't true |
|
People were pissed off with the first bill because Republicans put "pork" in it to supposedly "buy" votes for a timeline. Now people are calling the exact same aspects of the bill buying votes against the timeline.
|
pnwmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-25-07 02:58 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
12. In the House, it was 2 bills. In the Senate, there was only 1 bill |
|
Edited on Fri May-25-07 02:59 AM by pnwmom
that covered both the Iraq funding as well as some domestic funding and the minimum wage increase.
So Bush didn't get his Iraq war funding unless he signed the minimum wage increase, too. (Which he has opposed for the last 7 years.)
And people who voted against the Iraq war funding -- like Clinton and Obama -- also had to vote against the wage increase.
And meanwhile, the Republicans who followed the party line and voted for the Iraq funding will crow in the next election about how they supported the increase in the minimum wage.
|
avrdream
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-25-07 04:36 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
15. I agree with you pnwmom. |
|
But I don't think ANY politician "wins" from this (except maybe DUBYA who doesn't give a shit about the minimum wage since none of his family will ever have to worry about this increase) - I believe any vote can be spun to look bad in the respective next election. Either look like a flip-flopper, look like you wanted more troops to die, look like you didn't want to fund the troops, or look like you don't give a crap about poor people. No wins for politicians but about half the members of my family will benefit from the minimum wage increase.......I'm not happy about how it came about but I'm glad SOMETHING beneficial came out of this.
|
pnwmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-25-07 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
29. That's basically how I feel, too. |
|
And I think that's why Sen. Kennedy was happy that something good came of this, too, because he was pushing for the wage increase for a long time.
Welcome to DU, avrdream!
|
sandnsea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-24-07 11:27 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Only a one year timber extension |
|
The bill originally had five. So we lost there too. DeFazio and Wyden voted no at least.
|
Kagemusha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-24-07 11:36 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Sounds like 30 pieces of silver to me. |
|
I'm sorry, but when you put it like that, I take the above impression from it.
I think Olbermann called it selling out for a sack of magic beans.
|
pnwmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-25-07 03:02 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
13. What if you were an adult making $5.15 an hour? |
|
Are you so sure you would have told your reps to vote against increasing your pay to $7.25 an hour?
|
Bluebear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-25-07 04:16 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
14. The Democratic Congress couldn't have passed a minimum wage raise on their own? |
|
They had to tack it onto something, when the majority of the country approved of a minimum wage hike?
|
pnwmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-25-07 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
26. Bush would have vetoed it. He's the "decider," remember? |
|
And we wouldn't have had enough Republican votes going against him to override. He and the rest of his party don't care what people want, or we would have had an increase long ago.
|
Kagemusha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-25-07 07:39 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
16. So that more American kids can die in Iraq? That a serious question? |
|
I'm by no means a wealthy person, but that does not sound like a principled stand that I could make at any price.
|
pnwmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-25-07 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
27. I don't think it would be an EASY decision for someone actually at that |
|
income level.
And, though I applaud Obama and Clinton for voting as they did, I don't think it was easy for them to vote against the minimum wage increase. At the very least, it will give the Republican opponent in 2008 a very large stick to hit them with.
|
Kagemusha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-25-07 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #27 |
31. A Republican's gonna chew them out over voting against the minimum wage? |
enough already
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-25-07 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
20. What if you were the mother of a young man coming home in a box? |
|
How can you justify this bullshit? Have you no soul?
|
pnwmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-25-07 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
28. I asked my representatives to vote NO. However, I don't think it |
|
was an easy or obvious decision for Clinton, Obama, or anyone else. Having to vote against the minimum wage increase, having to explain that vote in the next couple years, isn't something a Democrat would want to do.
And, frankly, I don't think the bench marks would have made all that much difference, except symbolically, because Bush would have either disregarded or lied about them. How could we really trust any certification that he made?
|
Bluebear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-25-07 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #28 |
30. See, to me the decision would be easy and obvious. Dead kids vs a raise? No contest. nt |
Kagemusha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-25-07 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #30 |
32. I know pnwmom cares. This is about how "other people" might perceive it. |
|
As far as I'm concerned, there's no polling or moral support for the position that people on minimum wage are happy to see Americans in body bags so that they can earn a little more money. They won't be turning the money down; of course not. But it's not something to be proud of like this. Not something to be seen bragging about to low income people either.
|
pnwmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-25-07 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #32 |
|
for not over-reacting to what I said. Of course I don't think people on minimum wage are "happy" to see Americans in body bags so they could have the wage increase that is long overdue. The Iraq war is a tragedy that nothing can mitigate, and certainly not money.
But we can be sure that Republicans will be bragging about their vote to raise the minimum wage come 2008.
|
Kagemusha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-25-07 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #34 |
36. I think they're fools to think anyone believes they give a damn about min wage. |
|
If they wanna try it, sure. But I doubt its success, personally. I could always be wrong...
|
pnwmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-25-07 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #36 |
37. I guess you have more confidence than I do in people being |
|
able to see through them.
I'm worried about all the people who get their politics in ten second sound bites.
|
Orangepeel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-25-07 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #30 |
38. maybe they don't think defeating the bill would prevent the dead kids |
|
it isn't at all obvious to me that not passing the supplemental funding bill would cause bush to pull the troops out. for that to happen, bush would have to care more about the troops than his own ego. it is much more likely to me that he would half starve them and deny equipment in order to make a political point.
|
bluestateguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-24-07 11:39 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Reminds me of those old game shows on TV |
|
Host: "Well Bob, things didn't work out for you here today, but we've got some wonderful consolation prizes for you. Charlie, tell him what he'll be getting..."
Charlie: "It's an all expense weekend vacation to CANTON, OHIO!!"
|
Forkboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-25-07 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
L. Coyote
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-25-07 07:51 AM
Response to Original message |
17. Finally, milk on the table for the children again, just in time for the ethanol impact |
|
Now that the corn crop is being used to power Hummers, Suburbans, and SUVs, the price of food globally will rise significantly.
This is so overdue, and part of the Bush legacy is that the way minimum wage got raised was as an attachment to his War of Lies.
|
skipos
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-25-07 07:59 AM
Response to Original message |
18. If there were still Republican majorities, this never would have happened |
|
Yet many here will still claim there is "no difference" between Dems and Reps.
|
enough already
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-25-07 08:01 AM
Response to Original message |
19. How many young Americans will die for those "gains"? |
|
Sorry, but there is nothing redeemable in a bill that gives the Chimp a blank check to kill more innocent people.
|
Totally Committed
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-25-07 08:12 AM
Response to Original message |
21. Poverty and Peace are my two pet issues in America today.... |
|
Edited on Fri May-25-07 08:15 AM by Totally Committed
I have lobbied hard for an increase in the minimum wage now for years, and even I am sad that it had to come on the backs of the troops in the field. Ask the parents, siblings, and spouses of the men and women in the field right now how they feel about this minimum wage increase... and ask the minimum wage workers who will benefit, and my guess is not very many of them will agree with the Dem's vote on this.
I am ashamed.
Never forget the YEAS:
Akaka (D-HI) Alexander (R-TN) Allard (R-CO) Baucus (D-MT) Bayh (D-IN) Bennett (R-UT) Biden (D-DE) Bingaman (D-NM) Bond (R-MO) Brown (D-OH) Bunning (R-KY) Byrd (D-WV) Cantwell (D-WA) Cardin (D-MD) Carper (D-DE) Casey (D-PA) Chambliss (R-GA) Cochran (R-MS) Collins (R-ME) Conrad (D-ND) Corker (R-TN) Cornyn (R-TX) Craig (R-ID) Crapo (R-ID) DeMint (R-SC) Dole (R-NC) Domenici (R-NM) Dorgan (D-ND) Durbin (D-IL) Ensign (R-NV) Feinstein (D-CA) Graham (R-SC) Grassley (R-IA) Gregg (R-NH) Hagel (R-NE) Harkin (D-IA) Hutchison (R-TX) Inhofe (R-OK) Inouye (D-HI) Isakson (R-GA) Klobuchar (D-MN) Kohl (D-WI) Kyl (R-AZ) Landrieu (D-LA) Lautenberg (D-NJ) Levin (D-MI) Lieberman (ID-CT) Lincoln (D-AR) Lott (R-MS) Lugar (R-IN) Martinez (R-FL) McCain (R-AZ) McCaskill (D-MO) McConnell (R-KY) Menendez (D-NJ) Mikulski (D-MD) Murkowski (R-AK) Murray (D-WA) Nelson (D-FL) Nelson (D-NE) Pryor (D-AR) Reed (D-RI) Reid (D-NV) Roberts (R-KS) Rockefeller (D-WV) Salazar (D-CO) Sessions (R-AL) Shelby (R-AL) Smith (R-OR) Snowe (R-ME) Specter (R-PA) Stabenow (D-MI) Stevens (R-AK) Sununu (R-NH) Tester (D-MT) Thune (R-SD) Vitter (R-LA) Voinovich (R-OH) Warner (R-VA) Webb (D-VA)
Aderholt Akin Alexander Altmire Andrews Baca Bachmann Bachus Baird Baker Barrett (SC) Barrow Bartlett (MD) Barton (TX) Bean Berkley Berry Biggert Bilbray Bilirakis Bishop (GA) Bishop (UT) Blackburn Blunt Boehner Bonner Bono Boozman Boren Boswell Boucher Boustany Boyd (FL) Boyda (KS) Brady (TX) Brown (SC) Brown-Waite, Ginny Buchanan Burgess Burton (IN) Butterfield Buyer Calvert Camp (MI) Cannon Cantor Capito Cardoza Carney Carter Castle Chabot Chandler Clyburn Coble Cole (OK) Conaway Cooper Costa Cramer Crenshaw Cubin Cuellar Culberson Davis (CA) Davis (KY) Davis, David Davis, Lincoln Davis, Tom Deal (GA) Dent Diaz-Balart, L. Diaz-Balart, M. Dicks Dingell Donnelly Doolittle Drake Dreier Edwards Ehlers Ellsworth Emanuel English (PA) Etheridge Everett Fallin Feeney Ferguson Flake Forbes Fortenberry Fossella Foxx Franks (AZ) Frelinghuysen Gallegly Garrett (NJ) Gerlach Giffords Gilchrest Gillibrand Gillmor Gingrey Gohmert Gonzalez Goode Goodlatte Gordon Granger Graves Green, Gene Hall (TX) Hastert Hastings (WA) Hayes Heller Hensarling Herger Herseth Sandlin Hill Hinojosa Hobson Hoekstra Holden Hoyer Hulshof Hunter Inglis (SC) Issa Jindal Johnson (IL) Johnson, Sam Jones (NC) Jordan Kagen Kanjorski Keller Kildee Kind King (IA) King (NY) Kingston Kirk Kline (MN) Knollenberg Kuhl (NY) LaHood Lamborn Lampson Larsen (WA) Latham LaTourette Levin Lewis (CA) Lewis (KY) Linder Lipinski LoBiondo Lucas Lungren, Daniel E. Mack Mahoney (FL) Manzullo Marchant Marshall Matheson McCarthy (CA) McCaul (TX) McCotter McCrery McHenry McHugh McIntyre McKeon Meek (FL) Melancon Mica Miller (FL) Miller (MI) Miller, Gary Mitchell Mollohan Moore (KS) Moran (KS) Murphy, Tim Murtha Musgrave Myrick Neugebauer Nunes Ortiz Pearce Pence Peterson (MN) Peterson (PA) Petri Pickering Pitts Platts Poe Pomeroy Porter Price (GA) Pryce (OH) Putnam Radanovich Rahall Ramstad Regula Rehberg Reichert Renzi Reyes Reynolds Rodriguez Rogers (AL) Rogers (KY) Rogers (MI) Rohrabacher Ros-Lehtinen Roskam Ross Royce Ruppersberger Ryan (WI) Salazar Sali Saxton Schmidt Schwartz Scott (GA) Sensenbrenner Sessions Sestak Shadegg Shays Shimkus Shuler Shuster Simpson Skelton Smith (NE) Smith (NJ) Smith (TX) Snyder Souder Space Spratt Stearns Stupak Sullivan Tancredo Tanner Taylor Terry Thompson (MS) Thornberry Tiahrt Tiberi Turner Udall (CO) Upton Visclosky Walberg Walden (OR) Walsh (NY) Walz (MN) Wamp Wasserman Schultz Weldon (FL) Westmoreland Whitfield Wicker Wilson (NM) Wilson (OH) Wilson (SC) Wolf Young (AK) Young (FL)
TC
|
dunn
(77 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-25-07 12:03 PM
Response to Original message |
23. Most of the increase doesn't take effect until after the 2008 elections! That is unbelievable to me. |
|
That means less money going to the people who are more likely to vote for democrats in 2008! That means less campaigne money for Democrats running for office in 2008.
|
eppur_se_muova
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-26-07 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
39. It also means they could have gotten a better deal after the elections. |
|
Why give in to Bu**sh** in a deal for something that the Dems can just take for themselves in 2008 ?
|
auburngrad82
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-25-07 12:05 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I don't care if they do some things that they promised to do! They caved! Caved, I tell you! Dammit!
:sarcasm:
|
rhett o rick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-25-07 01:04 PM
Response to Original message |
25. Insulting. This paltry increase is the bone they throw to us when torture, habeas corpus, |
|
Iraq war funding, domestic spying, oil price gouging, and stolen elections are unresolved. Glad they have their priorities right. In 2008 when the voters ask, what have the democrats done for us lately, they will say they raised the minimum wage bill $.70 cents an hour.
|
DU GrovelBot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-25-07 02:52 PM
Response to Original message |
33. ## PLEASE DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ## |
|
================== GROVELBOT.EXE v4.0 ==================
This week is our second quarter 2007 fund drive. Democratic Underground is a completely independent website. We depend on donations from our members to cover our costs. Thank you so much for your support.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun May 05th 2024, 04:01 PM
Response to Original message |