Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

First minimum wage increase in more than a decade.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
kansasblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 11:21 PM
Original message
First minimum wage increase in more than a decade.


Passed tonight: The first minimum wage increase in more than a decade. The current federal wage floor of $5.15 an hour will go to $7.25 in three installments of 70 cents.

And Democrats also insisted on a variety of provisions to aid milk producers, American and Continental Airlines and rural counties hurt by the falloff in revenues from timber harvested on federal lands.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. We can't subsidize Amtrak, but it's okay to give money to AA and CAirlines. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I think we should be helping Amtrak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. I absolutely think we should subsidize Amtrak. But every year they argue over a pitance...
for Amtrak and write HUGE checks for the airlines and to subsidize airports in small cities. If you know how much you paid per ticket every time someone lands in Utica, NY or Johnstown PA...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kansasblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. that did seem a little strange. Auto industry is hurting too. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well whoopty fucking do.
Why did they attach it to a bill that will leave a lot of people dead and maimed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Because that made it veto proof.
Kennedy has been trying to get one passed for years, but the Bush administration has always opposed it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
35. Think about it
why did Kennedy vote against it?

Try to figure this out ok

(He knowns something many don't realize, the bill is a poison pill and minimum wage was the sugar coat to make the poison taste better)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kansasblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. technical they were seperate. But the deal was made to get
them both passed..... war funding. Domestic funding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. That really isn't true
People were pissed off with the first bill because Republicans put "pork" in it to supposedly "buy" votes for a timeline. Now people are calling the exact same aspects of the bill buying votes against the timeline.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 02:58 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. In the House, it was 2 bills. In the Senate, there was only 1 bill
Edited on Fri May-25-07 02:59 AM by pnwmom
that covered both the Iraq funding as well as some domestic funding and the minimum wage increase.

So Bush didn't get his Iraq war funding unless he signed the minimum wage increase, too. (Which he has opposed for the last 7 years.)

And people who voted against the Iraq war funding -- like Clinton and Obama -- also had to vote against the wage increase.

And meanwhile, the Republicans who followed the party line and voted for the Iraq funding will crow in the next election about how they supported the increase in the minimum wage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avrdream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 04:36 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. I agree with you pnwmom.
But I don't think ANY politician "wins" from this (except maybe DUBYA who doesn't give a shit about the minimum wage since none of his family will ever have to worry about this increase) - I believe any vote can be spun to look bad in the respective next election. Either look like a flip-flopper, look like you wanted more troops to die, look like you didn't want to fund the troops, or look like you don't give a crap about poor people. No wins for politicians but about half the members of my family will benefit from the minimum wage increase.......I'm not happy about how it came about but I'm glad SOMETHING beneficial came out of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #15
29. That's basically how I feel, too.
And I think that's why Sen. Kennedy was happy that something good came of this, too, because he was pushing for the wage increase for a long time.

Welcome to DU, avrdream!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. Only a one year timber extension
The bill originally had five. So we lost there too. DeFazio and Wyden voted no at least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
9. Sounds like 30 pieces of silver to me.
I'm sorry, but when you put it like that, I take the above impression from it.

I think Olbermann called it selling out for a sack of magic beans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 03:02 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. What if you were an adult making $5.15 an hour?
Are you so sure you would have told your reps to vote against increasing your pay to $7.25 an hour?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 04:16 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. The Democratic Congress couldn't have passed a minimum wage raise on their own?
They had to tack it onto something, when the majority of the country approved of a minimum wage hike?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #14
26. Bush would have vetoed it. He's the "decider," remember?
And we wouldn't have had enough Republican votes going against him to override. He and the rest of his party don't care what people want, or we would have had an increase long ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 07:39 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. So that more American kids can die in Iraq? That a serious question?
I'm by no means a wealthy person, but that does not sound like a principled stand that I could make at any price.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #16
27. I don't think it would be an EASY decision for someone actually at that
income level.

And, though I applaud Obama and Clinton for voting as they did, I don't think it was easy for them to vote against the minimum wage increase. At the very least, it will give the Republican opponent in 2008 a very large stick to hit them with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. A Republican's gonna chew them out over voting against the minimum wage?
That's gonna work?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enough already Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #13
20. What if you were the mother of a young man coming home in a box?
How can you justify this bullshit? Have you no soul?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #20
28. I asked my representatives to vote NO. However, I don't think it
was an easy or obvious decision for Clinton, Obama, or anyone else. Having to vote against the minimum wage increase, having to explain that vote in the next couple years, isn't something a Democrat would want to do.

And, frankly, I don't think the bench marks would have made all that much difference, except symbolically, because Bush would have either disregarded or lied about them. How could we really trust any certification that he made?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. See, to me the decision would be easy and obvious. Dead kids vs a raise? No contest. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. I know pnwmom cares. This is about how "other people" might perceive it.
As far as I'm concerned, there's no polling or moral support for the position that people on minimum wage are happy to see Americans in body bags so that they can earn a little more money. They won't be turning the money down; of course not. But it's not something to be proud of like this. Not something to be seen bragging about to low income people either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. Thank you Kagemusha,
for not over-reacting to what I said. Of course I don't think people on minimum wage are "happy" to see Americans in body bags so they could have the wage increase that is long overdue. The Iraq war is a tragedy that nothing can mitigate, and certainly not money.

But we can be sure that Republicans will be bragging about their vote to raise the minimum wage come 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. I think they're fools to think anyone believes they give a damn about min wage.
If they wanna try it, sure. But I doubt its success, personally. I could always be wrong...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. I guess you have more confidence than I do in people being
able to see through them.

I'm worried about all the people who get their politics in ten second sound bites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orangepeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #30
38. maybe they don't think defeating the bill would prevent the dead kids
it isn't at all obvious to me that not passing the supplemental funding bill would cause bush to pull the troops out. for that to happen, bush would have to care more about the troops than his own ego. it is much more likely to me that he would half starve them and deny equipment in order to make a political point.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
10. Reminds me of those old game shows on TV
Host: "Well Bob, things didn't work out for you here today, but we've got some wonderful consolation prizes for you. Charlie, tell
him what he'll be getting..."

Charlie: "It's an all expense weekend vacation to CANTON, OHIO!!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #10
22. LOL
That's a tough prize. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
17. Finally, milk on the table for the children again, just in time for the ethanol impact
Now that the corn crop is being used to power Hummers, Suburbans, and SUVs, the price of food globally will rise significantly.

This is so overdue, and part of the Bush legacy is that the way minimum wage got raised was as an attachment to his War of Lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
18. If there were still Republican majorities, this never would have happened
Yet many here will still claim there is "no difference" between Dems and Reps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enough already Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
19. How many young Americans will die for those "gains"?
Sorry, but there is nothing redeemable in a bill that gives the Chimp a blank check to kill more innocent people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
21. Poverty and Peace are my two pet issues in America today....
Edited on Fri May-25-07 08:15 AM by Totally Committed
I have lobbied hard for an increase in the minimum wage now for years, and even I am sad that it had to come on the backs of the troops in the field. Ask the parents, siblings, and spouses of the men and women in the field right now how they feel about this minimum wage increase... and ask the minimum wage workers who will benefit, and my guess is not very many of them will agree with the Dem's vote on this.

I am ashamed.

Never forget the YEAS:

Akaka (D-HI)
Alexander (R-TN)
Allard (R-CO)
Baucus (D-MT)
Bayh (D-IN)
Bennett (R-UT)
Biden (D-DE)
Bingaman (D-NM)
Bond (R-MO)
Brown (D-OH)
Bunning (R-KY)
Byrd (D-WV)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Cardin (D-MD)
Carper (D-DE)
Casey (D-PA)
Chambliss (R-GA)
Cochran (R-MS)
Collins (R-ME)
Conrad (D-ND)
Corker (R-TN)
Cornyn (R-TX)
Craig (R-ID)
Crapo (R-ID)
DeMint (R-SC)
Dole (R-NC)
Domenici (R-NM)
Dorgan (D-ND)
Durbin (D-IL)
Ensign (R-NV)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Graham (R-SC)
Grassley (R-IA)
Gregg (R-NH)
Hagel (R-NE)
Harkin (D-IA)
Hutchison (R-TX)
Inhofe (R-OK)
Inouye (D-HI)
Isakson (R-GA)
Klobuchar (D-MN)
Kohl (D-WI)
Kyl (R-AZ)
Landrieu (D-LA)
Lautenberg (D-NJ)
Levin (D-MI)
Lieberman (ID-CT)
Lincoln (D-AR)
Lott (R-MS)
Lugar (R-IN)
Martinez (R-FL)
McCain (R-AZ)
McCaskill (D-MO)
McConnell (R-KY)
Menendez (D-NJ)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Murkowski (R-AK)
Murray (D-WA)
Nelson (D-FL)
Nelson (D-NE)
Pryor (D-AR)
Reed (D-RI)
Reid (D-NV)
Roberts (R-KS)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Salazar (D-CO)
Sessions (R-AL)
Shelby (R-AL)
Smith (R-OR)
Snowe (R-ME)
Specter (R-PA)
Stabenow (D-MI)
Stevens (R-AK)
Sununu (R-NH)
Tester (D-MT)
Thune (R-SD)
Vitter (R-LA)
Voinovich (R-OH)
Warner (R-VA)
Webb (D-VA)


Aderholt
Akin
Alexander
Altmire
Andrews
Baca
Bachmann
Bachus
Baird
Baker
Barrett (SC)
Barrow
Bartlett (MD)
Barton (TX)
Bean
Berkley
Berry
Biggert
Bilbray
Bilirakis
Bishop (GA)
Bishop (UT)
Blackburn
Blunt
Boehner
Bonner
Bono
Boozman
Boren
Boswell
Boucher
Boustany
Boyd (FL)
Boyda (KS)
Brady (TX)
Brown (SC)
Brown-Waite, Ginny
Buchanan
Burgess
Burton (IN)
Butterfield
Buyer
Calvert
Camp (MI)
Cannon
Cantor
Capito
Cardoza
Carney
Carter
Castle
Chabot
Chandler
Clyburn
Coble
Cole (OK)
Conaway
Cooper
Costa
Cramer
Crenshaw
Cubin
Cuellar
Culberson
Davis (CA)
Davis (KY)
Davis, David
Davis, Lincoln
Davis, Tom
Deal (GA)
Dent
Diaz-Balart, L.
Diaz-Balart, M.
Dicks
Dingell
Donnelly
Doolittle
Drake
Dreier
Edwards
Ehlers
Ellsworth
Emanuel
English (PA)
Etheridge
Everett
Fallin
Feeney
Ferguson
Flake
Forbes
Fortenberry
Fossella
Foxx
Franks (AZ)
Frelinghuysen
Gallegly
Garrett (NJ)
Gerlach
Giffords
Gilchrest
Gillibrand
Gillmor
Gingrey
Gohmert
Gonzalez
Goode
Goodlatte
Gordon
Granger
Graves
Green, Gene
Hall (TX)
Hastert
Hastings (WA)
Hayes
Heller
Hensarling
Herger
Herseth Sandlin
Hill
Hinojosa
Hobson
Hoekstra
Holden
Hoyer
Hulshof
Hunter
Inglis (SC)
Issa
Jindal
Johnson (IL)
Johnson, Sam
Jones (NC)
Jordan
Kagen
Kanjorski
Keller
Kildee
Kind
King (IA)
King (NY)
Kingston
Kirk
Kline (MN)
Knollenberg
Kuhl (NY)
LaHood
Lamborn
Lampson
Larsen (WA)
Latham
LaTourette
Levin
Lewis (CA)
Lewis (KY)
Linder
Lipinski
LoBiondo
Lucas
Lungren, Daniel E.
Mack
Mahoney (FL)
Manzullo
Marchant
Marshall
Matheson
McCarthy (CA)
McCaul (TX)
McCotter
McCrery
McHenry
McHugh
McIntyre
McKeon
Meek (FL)
Melancon
Mica
Miller (FL)
Miller (MI)
Miller, Gary
Mitchell
Mollohan
Moore (KS)
Moran (KS)
Murphy, Tim
Murtha
Musgrave
Myrick
Neugebauer
Nunes
Ortiz
Pearce
Pence
Peterson (MN)
Peterson (PA)
Petri
Pickering
Pitts
Platts
Poe
Pomeroy
Porter
Price (GA)
Pryce (OH)
Putnam
Radanovich
Rahall
Ramstad
Regula
Rehberg
Reichert
Renzi
Reyes
Reynolds
Rodriguez
Rogers (AL)
Rogers (KY)
Rogers (MI)
Rohrabacher
Ros-Lehtinen
Roskam
Ross
Royce
Ruppersberger
Ryan (WI)
Salazar
Sali
Saxton
Schmidt
Schwartz
Scott (GA)
Sensenbrenner
Sessions
Sestak
Shadegg
Shays
Shimkus
Shuler
Shuster
Simpson
Skelton
Smith (NE)
Smith (NJ)
Smith (TX)
Snyder
Souder
Space
Spratt
Stearns
Stupak
Sullivan
Tancredo
Tanner
Taylor
Terry
Thompson (MS)
Thornberry
Tiahrt
Tiberi
Turner
Udall (CO)
Upton
Visclosky
Walberg
Walden (OR)
Walsh (NY)
Walz (MN)
Wamp
Wasserman Schultz
Weldon (FL)
Westmoreland
Whitfield
Wicker
Wilson (NM)
Wilson (OH)
Wilson (SC)
Wolf
Young (AK)
Young (FL)


TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dunn Donating Member (77 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
23. Most of the increase doesn't take effect until after the 2008 elections! That is unbelievable to me.
That means less money going to the people who are more likely to vote for democrats in 2008! That means less campaigne money for Democrats running for office in 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-26-07 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #23
39. It also means they could have gotten a better deal after the elections.
Why give in to Bu**sh** in a deal for something that the Dems can just take for themselves in 2008 ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
auburngrad82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
24. Dems caved, dammit
I don't care if they do some things that they promised to do! They caved! Caved, I tell you! Dammit!

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
25. Insulting. This paltry increase is the bone they throw to us when torture, habeas corpus,
Iraq war funding, domestic spying, oil price gouging, and stolen elections are unresolved. Glad they have their priorities right. In 2008 when the voters ask, what have the democrats done for us lately, they will say they raised the minimum wage bill $.70 cents an hour.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU GrovelBot  Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-25-07 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
33. ## PLEASE DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ##
==================
GROVELBOT.EXE v4.0
==================



This week is our second quarter 2007 fund drive. Democratic
Underground is a completely independent website. We depend on donations
from our members to cover our costs. Thank you so much for your support.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC