Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kristol: Bush ‘Was Furious’ Over NYT Report Of 2008 Withdrawal »

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-28-07 08:09 AM
Original message
Kristol: Bush ‘Was Furious’ Over NYT Report Of 2008 Withdrawal »
Ha ha. glad he is mad. ha ha

http://thinkprogress.org/?tag=Iraq

Kristol: Bush ‘Was Furious’ Over NYT Report Of 2008 Withdrawal »


The New York Times reported this weekend that the Bush administration is developing “concepts for reducing American combat forces in Iraq by as much as half next year, according to senior administration officials in the midst of the internal debate.” The White House immediately tried to tamp down the story.

If there was ever any lingering doubt about whether the White House might finally be considering a redeployment, Weekly Standard editor Bill Kristol put those hopes to bed this morning on Fox News. He revealed that Bush is “furious” over the NYT report and that the White House is aggressively pushing back on the story over the Memorial Day weekend. Kristol said:

The president apparently was furious about the New York Times article Saturday. One senior White House official went out of his way to call me Saturday and left me a voicemail saying that. So, since they don’t normally do that on Saturdays, I think maybe it’s even true.

Watch it:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-28-07 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. Kristol snitching on Bush. Oh glory days:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-28-07 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. what's that horrid ad tune, "he's mad, I'm glad. . . "
all it will take is a few more pushes before he cracks in public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-28-07 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
3. "Time to retreat from our lies." - Commander AWOL
"But we republicons did make a Massive Boodle of War Profits
while the getting was good. So sorry about my WMD lies. Smirk, smirk, smirk."

- Commander AWOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
partylessinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-28-07 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
4. Oh, really? Can't Shrub speak for himself?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-28-07 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Nobody takes Junior seriously any more.
Edited on Mon May-28-07 01:17 PM by formercia
Kristol leaking a story hasn't much credibility either.

The head of PNAC already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-28-07 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
5. Oh I'm sure it is true
After reading reports of increases in troop size to over two hundred thousand by Christmas it seems quite likely. They will have a forty percent reduction in troop strength and claim it is evidence of American Victory so Republicans will get elected in November. It is so obvious and yet most Americans will fall for it..There will still be about a hundred and twenty five thousand troops there so nothing will actually have changed and the Democrats will fall for it hook line and sinker. It is how Politics works and this Administration knows about politics..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-28-07 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
6. Back to pre-surge levels
it's all a numbers game. Same troops, stuck in the same shit-hole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davhill Donating Member (854 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-28-07 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
7. What he really meant was
a 2009 withdrawal. After he leaves office and can snipe at his successor for "losing the war."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemGa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-28-07 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
8. Furious over their own leak?
Uh, yeah right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC