Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cheney: VP should be the President's chief of staff...everything should run through his office.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Hart2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 10:07 AM
Original message
Cheney: VP should be the President's chief of staff...everything should run through his office.
Edited on Tue Jun-26-07 10:08 AM by Hart2008
Excerpted From "Angler: A Strong Push From Backstage"

As President Gerald R. Ford's chief of staff in the 1970s, Cheney saw firsthand how White House policies got shaped -- and how a vice president such as Nelson Rockefeller could become so marginalized as to be dumped from the ticket. Former Army secretary John O. Marsh Jr. said Cheney knew that he needed to control the process by which the president makes choices to ride "the rushing river of power" that winds through the West Wing to the Oval Office.

"Dick's major concern, one of them was, and I agree, that there needs to be a greater and more effective role for the vice president," Marsh, a longtime Cheney friend, said in an interview. "He holds the view, as do I, that the vice president should be the chief of staff in effect, that everything should run through his office.

In Bush, Cheney found the perfect partner. The president's willingness to delegate left plenty of room for his more detail-oriented vice president."


http://blog.washingtonpost.com/cheney/chapters/a_strong_push_from_back_stage/index.html

They should get this John O. Marsh Jr. before the House Judiciary committee and investigate Cheney regarding the impeachment articles. Kind of hard to say the VP is not in the executive branch of government when the VP is acting as the President's chief of staff.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. I actually agree with this. A VP should have SOMETHING to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
2. He seems to think that the VP is like the prime minister...
...and the POTUS is a ceremonial office similar to a constitutional monarch or some countries that have ceremonial presidents.

I suggest he go back to the Constitution and read Article II again. The founders rejected that approach. The POTUS is the top minister and there is no ceremonial office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
3. Uh, DICK, the president HAS a chief of staff
and you're not it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
4. If the VP gets marginalized, it is the VP's fault
The Founders made the Vice President the President of the Senate for a reason: to shape the federal government through legislative rather than executive means. Remember, the VP originally was the first runner-up in the race for President and presumably the President's chief rival. By putting both men into positions of power, the Founders intended to keep both happy and to provide a check on the power of the other. If a Vice President refuses to excercise this power, it is his own fault.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC