Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is there any way we can BLOCK Hillary Clinton's nomination?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
StudentsMustUniteNow Donating Member (859 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 09:40 PM
Original message
Is there any way we can BLOCK Hillary Clinton's nomination?
I'd like to believe that we and our affiliates and sympathizers make up a significant portion of the active voting bloc of the Democratic Party. The majority of us is against Hillary Clinton's nomination and between 40-50% of us will not vote for her if she receives the nomination.

Is there any way we can form a strategy so that she does not receive the nomination?

The more experienced folks here may remember the 1968 convention. Back then, Daley had pretty much a blank check to use harsh force. If we tried it today, and made a mass effort, both online and in the streets, can we make our voices heard?

I think we can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. Of Course There Is, Sir
See to it another candidate gets more votes in the primaries next year.

Nothing else can serve the turn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StudentsMustUniteNow Donating Member (859 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. With all due respect, Sir
There is more to politics than simply voting. If all we do is vote, then we're NOT fulfilling our duty as citizens to the full extent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. It Remains, Sir, the Means By Which Nominating Delegates Are Apportioned
The person who has the most of these will receive the Party's nomination.

No demonstration, or any other act outside the Party's rules for the process, will have the slightest effect, in the face of a candidate's having received the most votes in the primaries, and possessing the most pledged delegates at the convention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 07:20 AM
Response to Reply #3
62. This is only my opinion, and no one needs to agree or not, but....
Edited on Thu Jun-28-07 07:22 AM by Totally Committed
if "the fix" is already in, there is nothing that can stop her, except maybe a candidate not already in the race, stepping in and sweeping up the truly Liberal/Progressive vote from under her in the primaries. If that happens, we can upset "the fix", probably.

Short of that, there is probably nothing since the DLC has really loaded the slate with their minions. They are playing this election like a game of musical chairs. If enough of them are in the election, when the music stops, odds are at least one of their minions will be seated. When Bayh and Vilsack pooped out, they managed to get Richardson to run, because Dodd is really running for VP.

So, that answer is probably longer than what you wanted, but it is my opinion.

TC

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #62
68. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #68
69. I said "This is only my opinion"...
Edited on Thu Jun-28-07 09:43 AM by Totally Committed
Is that not enough of a disclaimer?

Please let me know, because in my opinion, they are the closest thing in this Party to a Republicans to be found. BUT, that is only my opinion.

TC

Edited to add: Please check your PM's. Thanks!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ieoeja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #68
75. Are they?

Remember what happened in Australia. Following early DLC success in the United States, a simliar organization was established in Australia and managed to take over the Liberal Party from within. After a decade of this Liberals discovered that this group was actually a front group for the Rightists.

They didn't move the party Right to win elections so they would then have the power to move the country Left (which, when you lay it out plainly like that doesn't make much sense). They moved the party Right so Australia and the Conservative Party could move further Right, so they could move Australia and the Liberal Party further Right, so they could move Australia and the Conservative Party further Right, ad nauseum.

Are you entirely certain the DLC is not the same as their Australian successor?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #75
84. That's one example I remember clearly, and I base a lot of my distrust and dislike of the DLC
Edited on Thu Jun-28-07 01:29 PM by Totally Committed
on this very example.

There is another example, however. It's the one that brought Newt Gingrich, and his Republican Revolutionists into power in 1994. That was a carefully planned take-over the the Republican Party by the Neo-Con fringe. This "movement" also brought this country the RW SCOTUS, the Republican Party the RW Extremist Christians, and everyone PNAC's neverneding War. We also have them to thank for the Bush administration and Dick Cheney as the "shadow" POTUS. The Republican Party was taken over by the extreme RW of their Party from within, under the guise of anti-corruption. All the moderates and genuine conservatives have been replaced by RW extremists. I believe that is what's happening to the Democratic Party today. I think we are being taken over from within by an entity that does not share our values, and they mean to have this Party their way (RW and Corporatist), or dead in its tracks.

This, once again, is only my opinion, so I don't expect anyone to agree with me or not.

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 07:09 AM
Response to Reply #1
61. Unfortunately, ...
> See to it another candidate gets more votes in the primaries next year.
>
> Nothing else can serve the turn.

Unfortunately, RFK and Paul Wellstone would both
disagree with you about that; let's hope we don't
see things get to that level this year because it
might just provoke open revolution this time.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. Nope
Edited on Wed Jun-27-07 09:43 PM by ProudDad
According to the naysayers we need 60 votes in the Senate to do anything good... :) :evilgrin:

Where are the votes?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. No
Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee. Resistance is futile. She is the inevitable nominee....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StudentsMustUniteNow Donating Member (859 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Who the hell does she think she is?
We're the people. I'm sick of having the media push her. ENOUGH! WE NEED TO ASSERT OURSELVES AS CITIZENS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Embrace The Clinton Golden Triangle
The way of the windsock is the one true course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NCarolinawoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. LOL!
:banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
42. What's with this windsock?
I saw the windsock mentioned in another post.

What is this windsock...and is Snoopy featured on this windsock?

Just askin.... :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Haha you funny
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
puebloknot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
104. Resistance will happen if she is the inevitable nominee! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. "Is there any way we can form a strategy so that she does not receive the nomination?"
Yeah, we'll do that right here on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchtv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
9. You don't support our nominee in 11-08
you deserve what comes . I don't support Senator Clinton, but she's better than any puke politician out there. The sooner you learn that the better we will all be. You want a riot? go visit the GOP convention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
11. And who is it you prefer? Many of your posts seem disparaging of several candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #11
102. Looks like he hasn't quite made up his mind! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freesqueeze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
12. That can't be right...
Edited on Wed Jun-27-07 09:56 PM by freesqueeze
"40-50% of us will not vote for her if she receives the nomination"

I'm not buying it. I'm not a big fan of Hillary, and her memory hole on Iraq, but if she gets the nomination I (and most every other DUer) will vote for the best person for the job. I'm assuming that by "us" you mean the progressives who read and contribute to DU.

But if I were another democratic candidate I would start shining a light on her weaknesses, starting with her Iraq-amnesia.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connie_Corleone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
13. This is not 1968.
Edited on Wed Jun-27-07 09:57 PM by Connie_Corleone
The primaries decide who the nominee will be. If more Democrats vote for Hillary over the other candidates, then so be it. That's the democratic process in action.

She's not my first choice, but if she gets the nomination, I'll vote for her. I'll take Hillary over the repug candidates any day.

I'm not going to actively work against a Democratic candidate.

If you want to live in the past, go ahead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
draft_mario_cuomo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
14. The netroots and progressives must unite in order to defeat the awesome HRC machine
Edited on Wed Jun-27-07 09:59 PM by draft_mario_cuomo
I think the best thing that has happened for HRC this year has been Obama's entry into the race. That divided the netroots (while Edwards is the clear favorite among the netroots he has nothing like the overwhelming support Dean enjoyed on the netroots) and progressives. If I were a conspiracy theorist I would say the DLC put him up to it to help divide the progressive vote while also simultaneously presenting a solid plan B for Third Way Democrats and corporate America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StudentsMustUniteNow Donating Member (859 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. Exactly. I have a feeling Clinton and Obama will strike a deal n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
draft_mario_cuomo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #19
28. Clinton-Obama? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #19
29. Never! The Clintons take no prisoners and besides, Obama is damaged goods!
Obama mistakenly said, (instead of Bill) "She was President", last night..

http://www.suntimes.com/news/elections/443363,CST-NWS-dems26.article
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moochy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #29
52. HRC: "We balanced the budget" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #19
30. What kind of student are you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StudentsMustUniteNow Donating Member (859 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. Law n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truth2Tell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #19
85. I've wondered since Obama got in
Edited on Thu Jun-28-07 01:32 PM by Truth2Tell
if he wasn't a stalking horse for HRC - or the fall-back position for those corporate backers who have come to fear that Hillary's baggage makes her unelectable.

My tin-foil hat is getting fuzzy and unclear messages on this, so my jury is still out.

To stop the Clinton machine, Progressives would need to unite behind an alternative... after Iowa and NH, but before Super Primary Day. Could happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
15. "We"? We are a small slice of a small part of the base. Live with it.
First of all, I don't even know what you mean by "affiliates and sympathizers" and while it is clear that you would "like to believe" that "we" make up a significant portion of the active voting bloc of the Democratic Party, that belief is, to put it mildly, a pipedream.

In 2004, in just California and New York, there were 3 and a half million votes cast in the Democratic primaries. There have been 105,169 user registrations on DU in six years. Do the math.

You are under the serious misunderstanding that DU is the "base" for the Democratic Party. Its a relatively small slice of a small part of the base.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #15
51. And the Hillary-haters here are just a fraction of the small slice of the
small part of the base.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #51
67. So you won't miss our votes then. Don't complain later. (NT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #67
76. So you'll take your ball and go home?
Edited on Thu Jun-28-07 11:19 AM by rinsd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #67
90. When the Republican wins, you can thank yourself. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #67
95. I'd like all Democrats to vote for Democrats, but anyone who thinks
that DU represents a "significant portion of the active voting bloc of the Democratic Party" or that a majority of DUers would sit on their hands, vote repub, or 3rd party if Clinton gets the nomination is just deluding themselves.

If someone wants to make an emotional appeal, fine. But to try and support that appeal with ludicrous factual claims is pretty stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
17. Hillary is the frontrunner for one simple reason...
She is the most popular Democrat running for President...that is a fact you need to wrap your head around. It isn't the media pushing her, it isn't "name recognition," it isn't lazy apathetic Democrats, it is that outside of the small patch of Democratic grass that makes up the "netroots" she is a highly popular figure within the party...

No amount of caterwauling from the netroots is going to change that....

Now if you have a candidate you prefer, I suggest you get out from behind your keyboard and hit the pavement, or the phones...start giving Democrats a reason to vote for someone else...and those of us who believe Hillary is by far the best choice for nominee and President will be making our case as well!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarfare2008 Donating Member (378 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #17
50. Yes, and the one simple reason is....
...because the mediawhores said so! Including Rupert Murdoch. Who also holds fundraisers for her.

Rupert Murdoch is an enemy of this nation and anything good that remains of this nation. If he endorses a candidate, that should be enough reason to oppose her. Though her blatant right wing pandering (and position in the anti-Democratic, anti-American DLC) pushed me away long before that.

How are they voting in California these days?? It's no accident that primary got moved up. I suggest that election is watched VERY closely, and not by the party that keeps returning Feinstein to the Senate......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
18. Vote against her in the primary
and campaign for an alternative, if you are able. Those are the only legal means open to you.

I think her candidacy would be a disaster, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
20. Gore runs....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
21. Up to 50% of DUers won't vote for HRC in the general? Sorry, but
I refuse to believe that half of us are so stupid we'd rather help a Republican win.

Or are so stupid we don't know how progressive her overall voting record is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nevergiveup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
22. I don't support Hillary
nor do I particular like her nor do I think she has much of a chance in the general election but if she wins the nomination I will bust my butt working for her. If you decide to take to the streets perhaps you should do it for something productive like fighting the Dick Cheneys and Ann Coulters of the world. Next to these totally destructive characters Hillary looks pretty damn good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nedsdag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #22
72. I'm not busting my butt for her.
I won't pay attention to anything political and just vote in November. No bumper stickers, no canvassing, nothing. That's as much support I'm giving. Nothing more, nothing less.

It'll be another candidate I have to vote for, not because he/she is the best candidate but because I really won't have any say in the matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
23. What are you so afraid of??
Clinton might not be as progressive as some of us would like (myself included), but she's a far cry better than the Reps ~ and we sure could put that charismatic First Gentleman to work patching up our tattered relationships around the globe!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alamom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 02:42 AM
Response to Reply #23
56. Good question & good post. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
24. It is blocking in the mainstream where people don't know about her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StudentsMustUniteNow Donating Member (859 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. What do you mean? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #25
86. Don't ask ....
You might get dizzy from the responce.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
26. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
draft_mario_cuomo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #26
31.  StudentsMustUniteNow is one of the best contributors at DU nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StudentsMustUniteNow Donating Member (859 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. Thanks DMC!
Edited on Wed Jun-27-07 10:25 PM by StudentsMustUniteNow
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
draft_mario_cuomo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #33
41. Keep up the good work, especially the focus on economic issues!
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StudentsMustUniteNow Donating Member (859 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #26
32. You are suggesting that I am advocating violence?
It appears that this is what you are doing. If it is, it's against DU rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
StudentsMustUniteNow Donating Member (859 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. I'm the mayor of Chicago?
Thanks, that's a compliment I guess.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
StudentsMustUniteNow Donating Member (859 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. Good one
If you knew which law school I went to, you'd shit in your fucking pants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sueh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #40
44. Why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moochy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #39
53. Dupe
Edited on Thu Jun-28-07 01:18 AM by Moochy
self-delete
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moochy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #39
54. Quelle Suprise!
Edited on Thu Jun-28-07 01:18 AM by Moochy
An HRC supporter goes for a personal attack? ?? ?? GASP! :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
27. Yes, let's make sure the candidate with the least votes gets the nomination.
That candidate will be sure to win in November... well, except that they can't even get the majority of their own party's votes... But hey, this is America, and democracy is soooo last century.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
35. I do NOT want to!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
38. Make your voice heard and vote. The primaries are the process now.
Mayor Daley's primary role in the '68 Democratic Convention was about the anti-war protests outside the convention hall, not the political maneuvering among delegates inside. Both played off each other, yes, and the Mayor held some large sway in the Democratic party process in those days.

Hubert Humphrey came out of the convention as our nominee.

If peaceful protest is your favor for political action, go for it. Advocacy for a particular candidate? Go for it. Opposition to a particular candidate? Let that be known as well. Participation counts.

I think looking to 'block' one primary candidate's nomination or inclusion in today's nation wide system of primaries is somewhat short sighted.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
43. If she gets the most votes
she's the nominee. That's democracy for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #43
45. Yes
and I will be very happy to vote for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #43
87. Oh who needs them silly rules.
Rules are so un-hip and are for old and non-college educated people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
46. Voting in the primaries
And if she wins the primaries, then the result must be accepted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenTea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
47. Yes, don't vote for her...I'm loving Edwards more & more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CK_John Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
48. Students make up the lowest voting block, about 4%. I doubt you are even registered and
probably don't know your state deadline for registering and will have a great reason for missing the primary. A dog ate my homework excuse!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moochy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 01:19 AM
Response to Reply #48
55. More personal attacks! gooo hrc!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #55
89. Yeah! YEAH!
Obama supporters NEVER do that! :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moochy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #89
109. A Pox on both their houses?
I'll stand up for HRC when I see her getting unfairly slammed by dishonest blind partisan hypocrites.

So far her most strident supporters seem to have the monopoly, but I'll admit I've been picking and choosing what threads to read, and using Ignore on the "repeat offender" dishonest hypocritical supporters from all the camps. So what you say probably is right.

My possibly biased view is one of the side-effects of over utilizing the ignore feature. Point taken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last_texas_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 03:02 AM
Response to Reply #48
57. Wow, that's an awful lot of negative assumptions
to make about someone simply because they happen to be a student. You sound almost gleeful about the low-voter turnout among students, as if that's somehow a good thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nutmegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 03:53 AM
Response to Reply #48
59. Uncalled for
Edited on Thu Jun-28-07 04:00 AM by Nutmegger
I'm a young person.

I'm registered to vote and have voted in every election (not just the big Presidential elections) since I was 18.

I know all the names of Connecticut's Representatives. (I even volunteered for one.)

I know the Governor.

I know my Senators. (Sorry for LIARman.)

I know my state and local Representatives and contact them often.

I also know the names of all the Supreme Court Justices.

Et cetra...

I didn't just spout that off to brag; just because I'm a young person doesn't mean I'm zoned out on my iPod, hopped up on crystal meth and totally disconnected from reality. For you to assume so based on the age group of a person is foolishness.

Edited for clarity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
49. so if she gets the most votes legitimately she shouldn't get the nomination?
you would try and make people's votes not count because you don't like her? That doesn't sound very democratic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ethelk2044 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 03:06 AM
Response to Reply #49
58. she has a lot of negatives. No one has really mentioned them yet
Some people are registering as dems to vote for her opponents
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SKKY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 06:33 AM
Response to Original message
60. Actually, there is an easy way to block her nomination...
...convince Al Gore to run. That'll do the trick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #60
63. That sure as hell is ONE way.....
It would take all the truly Liberal/Progressives away from her in a split second, and leave her with just the DLC centrists as her base.

I'm all for it.

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
64. I've a question,
We're seeing the spectacle of Hillary being pushed on us by the media, the DLC, the Third Way Dems and the 'Pugs. My question is how are we to know that the votes will be counted, or counted correctly in this primary? Will we stand for a candidate, who in addition to having all of the corporate advantages, decides to play fast and loose with the vote count? Will party members stand for it? Will we call her on it? Will we go ahead and let her be our nominee in spite of it?

I ask this because of the record of the past three elections, where the vote has been rigged. What happens when this starts creeping down into the primary votes, for you know that sooner or later it will happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #64
70. This is "the fix" I was talking about in my post upthread:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=3342818&mesg_id=3343424

If the election has indeed been "fixed" she will be our nominee no matter what we do.

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
65. See that she doesn't have more delegate votes than all other candidates
If she has the most delegates why should we try to block that? The process is in place in each state.

Do you know how to become a delegate in your state???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
66. The nomination will be decided in voting booths and caucuses, not in the streets
Mob rule will not determine who our party nominates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
71. If she gets the most votes and wins the nom, I will support her
And unless Gore gets in, it looks like she might be the nom.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
73. Hillary will get the nom because the people against her are scattered among the other candidates.
Without any organization to combine those forces the nomination is Hillary's.

Then we get to find out how many of those people will vote for her after months of being pissed on by her oh so friendly supporters,and we'll see if that will be enough to counter the enormous turnout she'll inspire in the right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #73
93. You mean the un-hip, old and uneducated HRC supporters?
Yeah, all them Obama supporters just walk on water don't they? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #93
96. One:I never said or implied anything about Hillary supporters being "unhip,old and uneducated".
Two:I'm not an Obama supporter and not thrilled with them either,but once again a Hillary supporter resorts to the "they're just as bad" defense.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #96
99. I'm not talking about you, Godziller boy! :)
There is a certain Obama supporter that uses that line over and over and over and over!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
74. I hope to goodness that there are not that many idiots on our side
of the fence!
". . . and between 40-50% of us will not vote for her if she receives the nomination."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #74
78. Organized Idiocy? Organized Futility?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
77. This is truly the most idiotic thread I have seen in a long time
Good luck buddy. You'll need it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rockholm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #77
92. They just keep getting worse and worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #77
97. I actually thought the "Hillary's first name scandal" one was worse
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #97
98. I had not seen that. Good grief there are some anal people here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
79. You have to get everyone but Obama to drop out.
Coalescing the anti-Hillary vote with Obama's support.

Maybe then you would have a chance.

"The more experienced folks here may remember the 1968 convention. Back then, Daley had pretty much a blank check to use harsh force. If we tried it today, and made a mass effort, both online and in the streets, can we make our voices heard?"

Yeah how did that work out in the general election? :eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #79
80. The debate between Hillary and Obama will decide my vote...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #80
82. I like them both and would be happy with either as nominee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
81. I repeat...
What are you so afraid of?? Really, I'm curious to know what awful things you think she'd do as president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
83. absolutely . . . get Al Gore into the race . . . (maybe even Nobel winner Al Gore) . . . n/t
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sampsonblk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
88. Keep hope alive
I say this thing is over. But there is always the chance something could happen to change the race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #88
94. It ain't over till it's over.
I don't for one second believer that HRC has a lock on the nomination. And this is coming from a Clinton voter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sampsonblk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #94
100. But its out of the other candidates' hands
There isn't anything they can do or say to beat her. The only way for someone else to win is if something goes wrong for Clinton. No one is going to beat her in a debate and somehow win the nomination. And no clever jingle or slogan is going to do it either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #100
103. She IS a great debater.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rockholm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
91. Oh, please. Just go away.
Edited on Thu Jun-28-07 02:17 PM by Rockholm
Some of us actually LIKE her, believe it not not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
101. Yes there is a way.
But it's not democratic. Try Communism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StudentsMustUniteNow Donating Member (859 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #101
105. Ok, one guy accuses me of supporting McCain, now you accuse me of COMMUNISM??
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #105
106. It's okay... he saves the REALLY bad stuff for people he doesn't like.
trust me, that post was practically a hug. ;)

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moochy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #101
110. the 1950's called
they want their red-baiting rhetoric back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ethelk2044 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
107. Convience all of your Friends and Relatives to vote. Go out and Register
new voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
108. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC