Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lieberman Switch Wouldn't Flip Senate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 12:41 PM
Original message
Lieberman Switch Wouldn't Flip Senate
contact Harry Reid throw him out;

Washington, DC
528 Hart Senate Office Bldg
Washington, DC 20510
Phone: 202-224-3542
Fax: 202-224-7327
Toll Free for Nevadans:
1-866-SEN-REID (736-7343)

With Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT) publicly stating he'd consider becoming a Republican if Democrats block new funding for the Iraq War, many Democrats worry that control of the Senate hangs in the balance. However, their fears are unfounded. Many think back to 2001 when former Sen. Jim Jeffords (I-VT) began caucusing with Democrats instead of Republicans, taking control of the Senate out of GOP hands. However, the two situations - though outwardly similar - contain one important difference.

If Lieberman were to caucus with the Republicans, they would still not take full control of the Senate, despite Vice President Dick Cheney's ability to break 50-50 ties. This is because of a little-known Senate organizing resolution, passed in January, which gives Democrats control of the Senate and committee chairmanships until the beginning of the 111th Congress.

What's the difference between now and 2001? A small but important distinction. When the 107th Congress was convened on January 3, 2001, Al Gore was still the Vice President and would be for another two-and-a-half weeks. Therefore, because of the Senate's 50-50 tie, Democrats had nominal control of the chamber when the organizing resolution came to a vote. With Dick Cheney soon to come in, however, Democrats allowed Republicans to control the Senate in return for a provision on the organizing resolution that allowed for a reorganization of the chamber if any member should switch parties, which Jeffords did five months later. There was no such clause in the current Senate's organizing resolution.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well, I'll be dipped in shit...
I didn't know that and so I have been wrong...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Yea WC
I was sure I had heard something like that-why Harry doesn't do this, and why more, no, ALL of us don't demand it here.We need to do something-Harry Reid and the democrats in the Senate are doing everything they can too try and stop the madness of this war.The GOP is on a scorched earth policy now-deny,delay and destroy any and everything the dems are attempting to do regardless if it's what is best for anyone BUT the republic party-they truly are despicable humans
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZ Criminal JD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Reid is smarter than the OP
Reid doesn't do this because he knows that if the Senate went 50-50 another organizing clause could be presented and voted on with Cheney breaking the tie. There is nothing in the Senate rules that say these clauses can't be brought up in mid-session.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTLawGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. changing the senate rules takes 2/3 approval
so the OP is correct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. I wish Snowe would flip to Indy or Dem
That would make Lieberman's threats mute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Why she is a Republican...
I'll never know...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. Someone posted a thread offering to trade LieberWorm for Hagel last weekend,
Edited on Wed Jul-11-07 12:53 PM by wienerdoggie
which I heartily endorse, but it was shut down by the mods--why? We weren't advocating a Repub/Dem trade--we were advocating a Repub/Independent trade. I don't see why that's against the rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. Dammit! We need to just throw the guy out, now. We've put up
with his lies, blustering, warmongering, and blackmail for too damn long.

Cut the old bastid loose!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
8. I've written him TWO letters asking him why he continues to deceive the public on this matter.
Thanks for trying to get this info out there! I've been trying for months! Even have it posted in my journal! I want to know WHAT they have on Harry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
9. self deleted
Edited on Wed Jul-11-07 01:11 PM by Vash the Stampede
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
10. McConnell would shut down the Senate until a new organizing resolution was passed
However that does beg the question, if the Senate is shut down, how is Bush going to get his next Iraq supplemental appropriations bill?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. McConnell has essentially done it already
invoking cloture 42 times in 6 months-screw these republicans-if they wanna play hardball then hardball it should be.I'm curious to see what Harry's response to my E-mail will be...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. He's done it on high profiles items, but Congress passes lots of stuff that we never hear about...
Because there's little debate. All of that stuff will be stalled as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
12. Oh yea my thanks to Benhurst
for this story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC