A beautiful question about vitter today in the local paper

[BOSSHOG]

In a letter to the editor today in the New Orleans Times Picayune, a passionate citizen asks the question:

WHERE'S THE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT BANNING DAVID VITTER'S THREAT TO THE SANCTITY OF MARRIAGE?

Thank God for that letter writer. I wish I would have thought of that first. Please holier then thou hypocritical asshole lurkers, feel free to answer the question, unless of course you are on your knees and engaged. Oh I am sorry it is Wednesday night. Maybe you could answer the question in the morning.

[nadinbrzezinski]

1. He is on the madamne's book

he may still face prosecution

That is your marraige ammendment. After the passage of the ethics rules, he will loose his guv'ment pension, and the wife will fly the coop, if he is convicted that is.

Of course the US Senate could always censor him, for starters, but you know how they protect each other...

[spirit of wine]

2. Al Franken Had pointed out

Right after Katrina how David Vitter would abstain from even casting a vote on anything controversial, I always thought there was something a little off kilter right from the start with him because he was saying he had no opinion. Soon he will be saying now he has no job, welcome to the hell you helped create. Now go down to Louisiana and help out! You will have time.