Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Barack Obama: Senate Passes Obama, McCaskill Legislation to Provide Safety Net for Families of Wound

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
eweaver155 Donating Member (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-08-07 10:22 AM
Original message
Barack Obama: Senate Passes Obama, McCaskill Legislation to Provide Safety Net for Families of Wound
Amendment would provide family members up to one year of job safety as they care for wounded heroes
August 2, 2007 -- WASHINGTON, D.C. – Legislation introduced by U.S. Senator Barack Obama (D-IL) that would provide up to a full year of job protection for a family member who is caring for a service member recovering from combat-related injuries today passed the Senate. The Military Family Job Protection Act, introduced by Senators Barack Obama and Claire McCaskill (D-MO), passed as an amendment to the reauthorization of the Children’s Health Insurance Program.

This amendment would ensure that military families not be forced to wonder whether their job will still be there when they get back home and would ease the burden on service members who must focus on their own recovery. This approach was endorsed last week by the President’s Commission. Obama was also joined in this amendment by Senators Tom Harkin (D-IA), John Kerry (D-MA), Mary L. Landrieu (D-LA), Richard J. Durbin (D-IL), Sherrod Brown (D-OH), Edward Kennedy (D-MA), and Joseph R. Biden, Jr. (D-DE).

“When America’s sons and daughters are injured overseas and they return home to begin their recovery, their families should not be forced to choose between caring for a wounded child or keeping their jobs,” said Senator Obama. “This legislation would provide a safety net that allows families to offer the care that’s necessary for our wounded heroes, easing the burden on the service members. Providing our service members and their families with the care and compassion they deserve is one thing we can still get right about this war.”

“Family members should not have to choose between their livelihoods and caring for wounded loved ones and our proposal would remove that burden,” Senator McCaskill said.

Many families that are already experiencing financial strains due to the deployment of a loved one face additional financial and employment pressures when that service member returns with severe injuries. It is not uncommon for a severely injured service member to spend months recovering at facilities like Walter Reed. There are cases in which family members have had to choose between caring for a loved one and keeping their jobs. Under the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA), a family member may only receive 12 covered weeks of leave in a given year to care for a seriously ill family member.

http://www.allamericanpatriots.com/48727668_barack_obama_barack_obama_senate_passes_obama_mccaskill_legislation_provide_safety_net_fami
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-08-07 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. Good. But how about universal single-payer health care for all
Americans?

The World's Only Superpower. Yeah. Sure.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllyCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-08-07 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. What? That's socialized medicine! (gasp!)
Edited on Wed Aug-08-07 01:08 PM by AllyCat
Better no healthcare than socialized healthcare, right? :sarcasm:

So are these people going to get a year of pay, too? How else could they afford this?

edit to include thread hijack: Mothering magazine a couple months ago said that the US is one of only 4 countries that do not provide some type of paid maternity leave. The other 3 were Lesotho, Papua New Guinea, and Swaziland. Just another symptom of the much larger problem you mentioned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-08-07 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
2. Excellent. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-08-07 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
3. Excellent work
Of course, not to be seen on any MSM channel...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-08-07 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. Good to see.
Barack "no plans" Obama does it again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-08-07 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. I just looked at the poll on that AllAmericanPatriots website you posted...

Wow.. they really like Ron Paul there!

The poll they have going > http://www.allamericanpatriots.com/%5Bpoll%5D_if_u_s_presidential_election_were_held_today_whom_would_you_vote

Paul has a huge lead, followed by Obama, then Clinton, etc..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-08-07 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
7. this is great! They got that bill passed. I am really happy about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-08-07 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
8. Bravo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC