Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How do we repeal NAFTA and the China trade agreements?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 06:10 AM
Original message
How do we repeal NAFTA and the China trade agreements?

The Mexican trucks are now starting to show up in the US. We know many of the problems with China. What does it take to repeal this crap?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jmp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 06:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. Senators, Representatives and a President ...
That work on behalf of the American people.

Good luck tracking enough of those down. :(

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 07:10 AM
Response to Original message
2. Limit campaign contributions to $200 each from registered voters in a candidate's constituency. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 07:31 AM
Response to Original message
3. It would be tragic if we repealed those agreements.
Free trade is the best hope for economic growth for all, and peace in the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Sad - He really believes what he is saying
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Sadly, I almost agree with him.
"Free trade" is a misnomer (kind of like "free lunch"), but I would agree that "trade is the best hope for economic growth for all, and peace in the world."

Isolating national economies from each other is not a path to peace and prosperity. The difficult trick is to promote fair, managed, balanced, reciprocal, pro-people, pro-worker, pro-consumer, pro-American, pro-Third World (pick your favorite term or terms) trade between countries, while avoiding such nonsensical concepts as "free trade."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. Bull Shit - Free Trade = Exploited working class
Edited on Mon Sep-10-07 10:05 AM by FreakinDJ
You are just full of it today

If that was true then wages in Mexico would have gone up after NAFTA was implemented rather then the 20% DECREASE most workers in Mexico realized.

Nice to have such euphoric ideals but do you have a job
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #12
28. You lost me with that equation.
I just said that free trade was a nonsensical term and you then expect me to defend NAFTA?

Do you believe there can be trade with the Third World without any of the free trade bullshit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. Sounds remarkably like what Communists say re: USSR and China
"Real communism wasn't a failure in China and the USSR! Real communism hasn't been tried out yet."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Yes, I really do.
Breaking barriers to trade is the single most important economic task of the early 21st century.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
area51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Oh, please.
You'll say that until your own ass gets bit by your job being offshored. :eyes:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Exactly
Freaking making excuses for Hilary's Free Trade position

Lets import a few 1000 more Nurses from the Philippines - for those working in Health care whom have not been effected by the Free Trade Agreements. They well work for 20 - 30% LESS then these Free Trade Proponents
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 05:45 AM
Response to Reply #13
39. Do you believe there can be trade with the Third World without any of the free trade bullshit? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elwood P Dowd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #9
26. Bullshit! NAFTA, GATT, WTO, CAFTA, etc. are not free trade
and you fucking know it RobConservative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #26
32. Hee hee . . . I was wondering what member of my Red X Toilet was posting.
Don't miss THAT guy one iota . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 01:57 AM
Response to Reply #6
36. Just read the name,
then refuse to feed...

It will slink back into it's hole



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
4. Saw on CNN front page that a Mexican truck full of dynamite
blew up. It killed three reporters. I think it was heading out to deliver within the US> Now see how dangerous this truck rolling is. If a truck can't even be safe to pick up dangerous cargo within Mexico, what would happen on a long haul within the US>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
24. I believe it was going to a mexico coal mine?
Correct me if I'm wrong. I believe I read that online. Just sayin'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
5. Vote for Kucinich. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
8. We need to elect a president and congress that is against free trade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. At least 1 with some negotiating sense
Chine places a 25% tariff on our goods so we negotiate for 2.5%

Makes good sense to me !

Why should we allow those greedy corporate execs to go hungry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EndElectoral Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
10. Kuccinich has been against NAFTA since Day 1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ethelk2044 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
16. All was part of NAFTA and part of the first Clinton Administration
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelly Rupert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
17. You can't. Sorry. That ship's sailed. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
18. We have to keep the DLC/PPI/Third Way as far from public office as possible.
Let them fester in their Neo-Liberal think tanks, but keep them the hell out of my life. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WA98296 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
19. Back the ONLY candidate who says he will...Dennis Kucinich and never forget
that NAFTA was brought to us by a "democratic" president, Bill Clinton.

So, Hillary supports, go ask her how quickly she will repeal NAFTA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WA98296 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. This is how Kucinich responds to HOW...
"In my first week in office, I will notify Mexico and Canada that the US is withdrawing from NAFTA. We need a president who knows what the right thing is to do the first time, not in retrospect. And I think that we need to go forward to trade that's based on workers' rights, human rights and environmental quality principles. No one else on this stage could give a direct answer because they don't intend to scrap NAFTA. We're going to be stuck with it -- Dennis Kucinich
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. So Kucinich's answer is unilateral withdraw from treaties?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. That is how it is done--remember Bush withdrew from ABM treaty.
U.S. quits ABM treaty

December 14, 2001

Posted: 5:10 AM EST (1010 GMT)

By Manuel Perez-Rivas
CNN Washington Bureau

WASHINGTON (CNN) --President Bush said Thursday the United States has notified Russia that it intends to pull out of the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, starting a six-month timetable for withdrawal and opening the way for the creation of an anti-missile defense system.

"Today I am giving formal notice to Russia that the United States of America is withdrawing from this almost 30-year-old treaty," Bush said in the White House Rose Garden. "I have concluded the ABM treaty hinders our government's ability to develop ways to protect our people from future terrorist or rogue state missile attacks."

The announcement came after months of talks in which U.S. officials hoped to persuade Russia to set the treaty aside and negotiate a new strategic agreement. But a breakthrough did not materialize, and Bush decided to go ahead with a unilateral withdrawal.

* * *

http://archives.cnn.com/2001/ALLPOLITICS/12/13/rec.bush.abm/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. And what a wave of international love that little manuveur engendered
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. The OP was looking for how to get out of NAFTA, not love
The way to get out of treaties is to withdraw, a power which the executive has unilaterally.
But they won't tell you that on the TV.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
22. NAFTA Chapter 22, Article 2205: Withdrawal
Article 2205: Withdrawal

A Party may withdraw from this Agreement six months after it provides written notice of withdrawal to the other Parties. If a Party withdraws, the Agreement shall remain in force for the remaining Parties.

http://www.sice.oas.org/Trade/NAFTA/chap-22.asp#A2205
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 01:58 AM
Response to Reply #22
37. Thank you. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
29. Step 1: Stop electing Corporatists (from either Party)! Steps 2-10 will be a hell of a lot easier
then, if you know what I mean.... ;)

TC


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superkia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #29
33. Again, vote Kucinich if you want real change in America!
I believe he is the only one that has been speaking out about how our constitution is under attack and we are losing our freedoms which is VERY important to me. He has pointed directly at washington and the corruptness there, I don't understand why the others aren't taking a stand like him? HMMMM seems like these would be extremely important to everyones base, but I'm sure there is some reason?

Get out your rubber stamp and give Washington and the media who they want if you like but Im voting for change in this country because the typical politicians are destroying it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
30. kick
:kick:

TC

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-10-07 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
31. Kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
34. Make sure a Dem gets in the WH
All the Dem senators voted against CAFTA.

They learned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 02:00 AM
Response to Reply #34
38. Hmm, which candidate is it that has unequivocally stated that he will withdraw
from this loot-fest?






Oh yes,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adenoid_Hynkel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 01:29 AM
Response to Original message
35. step #1: Don't nominate the Clintons
step #2: nominate anyone else
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC