calteacherguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-03-07 09:30 PM
Original message |
Does Edwards think his 13% support is superficial as well? |
Colobo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-03-07 09:31 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I think 1 day in politics is an eternity... imagine 2 or 3 months. |
|
Ask Mike Dukkakis and Gerry Ford.
|
calteacherguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-03-07 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. What's changed in the last 2 or 3 months? nt |
DemocratSinceBirth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-03-07 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
5. How Does Jerry Ford Figure In This Analogy? |
Colobo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-03-07 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
9. He was way behind Carter and he managed to lose a very close election in 76. |
flyingfysh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-03-07 09:32 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Kerry used to have about that level of support in 2004 |
|
but he won the nomination.
|
calteacherguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-03-07 09:33 PM
Original message |
BadgerLaw2010
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-04-07 07:18 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
13. Yes, but Hillary isn't exactly Howard Dean. |
|
Dean's campaign was very unprofessionally run, top-to-bottom. Hillary is *the* establishment machine.
It's unrealistic to expect any major mistakes, such as miscounting supporters, wasting money on the care and feeding of Deaniacs and screaming on national TV so that the media could repeat it 800 times.
|
journalist3072
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-03-07 09:33 PM
Response to Original message |
4. LOL! Excellent question indeed. eom |
mitchtv
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-03-07 09:39 PM
Response to Original message |
|
But you have half of DU doing the GOP's dirty work for them to destroy the leader of the pack, and it won't help their candidate, maybe Edwards just has to stick around.
|
Trisket-Bisket
(110 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-03-07 09:44 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Please give him a break. |
|
He has invested a whole lot and it seems to be for naught.
Think "punch drunk"and you will be able to understand.
Hey,he is a Dem and his efforts should never be dissed or ridiculed.
|
calteacherguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-04-07 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
depakid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-03-07 09:44 PM
Response to Original message |
8. I suspect he knows what most intelligent people know |
|
Edited on Wed Oct-03-07 09:45 PM by depakid
That this poll is bogus and meant to try to push Hillary down our throats.
Anyone who believes these results reflect reality is nothing short of a sucker.
|
BlueStater
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-03-07 10:28 PM
Response to Original message |
10. What's superficial is your lame posts attacking Edwards n/t |
calteacherguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-04-07 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. As lame as Edwards calling a 33% lead superficial? nt |
|
Edited on Thu Oct-04-07 12:09 AM by calteacherguy
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat May 04th 2024, 09:25 AM
Response to Original message |