Friedman asks not who will succeed George Bush, but "Who Will Succeed Al Gore?"

[DeepModem Mom]

NYT: Who Will Succeed Al Gore?
By THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN
Published: October 14, 2007

Seeing Al Gore so deservedly share the Nobel Peace Prize, it is impossible not to note the contrast in his leadership and that of George W. Bush. Mr. Gore and Mr. Bush each faced a crucible moment. For Mr. Gore, it was winning the popular vote and having the election taken away from him by a Republican-dominated Supreme Court. For Mr. Bush, it was the shocking terrorist attack on 9/11.

Mr. Gore lost the presidency, but in the dignity and grace with which he gave up his legal fight, he united America. Then, faced with what to do with the rest of his life, he took up a personal crusade to combat climate change, even though the odds were stacked against him, his soapbox was small, his audiences were measured in hundreds, and his critics were legion. Nevertheless, Mr. Gore stuck with it and over time has played a central role in building a global consensus for action on this issue....

...Mr. Bush, rather than taking all that unity and using it to rebuild America for the 21st century, took all that unity and used it to push the narrow agenda of his “base.” He used all that unity to take a far-right agenda on taxes and social issues that was going nowhere on 9/10 and drive it into a 9/12 world. Never has so much national unity — which could have been used to develop a real energy policy, reverse our coming Social Security deficit, assemble a lasting coalition to deal with Afghanistan and Iraq, maybe even get a national health care program — been used to build so little. That is what historians will note most about Mr. Bush’s tenure — the sheer wasted opportunity of it all....

“Gore, even without the presidency, used all the modern tools of communication, the Internet, video and globalization to reach out and galvanize a global movement,” (David Rothkopf, author of the upcoming "Superclass: The Global Power Elite and the World They Are Making") said. “Bush took the greatest platform in the world and dug himself a policy grave.”

Now Mr. Bush is a spent force and Mr. Gore is, apparently, not running. So we still need a president who can unify the country around meaningful action on energy and climate....

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/14/opinion/14friedman.html?hp

[pansypoo53219]

1. too late

frydman. you tied yourself to georgie for iWaq. loser.

[Hieronymus]

5. Friedman has no credibility.

[Hekate]

2. KnR. So true. Bush wonders how history will judge him -- it already has. nt

:kick:

Hekate

[DesertRat]

3. k&r n/t

[RufusTFirefly]

4. Too little, too late for Thomas the Billionaire

Ever the privileged imperialist, Friedman still thinks you can saunter uninvited in to another person's yard, build something hideous he didn't even ask for, and expect him to like it.

"Yes, Iraq was always going to be hugely difficult, but the potential payoff of erecting a decent, democratizing government in the heart of the Arab world was also enormous."

And the implication that Gore just adopted global warming as an activity that offered possibilities for staying active in retirement is more than offensive. Ever read Earth in the Balance, Tom? Ever noticed its copyright date? Gore published that book 15 years ago.

[Riktor]

6. He's a "journalist", in the modern sense of the word...

... thus, he seeks to create sensation rather than awareness. He's done a few programs for the Discovery Times channel, which I found intriguing, but I couldn't get over the fact he carried himself like a smarmy TV personality.

If he bothered to do his research, and I'm getting the inkling he didn't, he would have known Gore began campaigning for environmentalism in the late 1970s. It's not like Gore was lounging around his villa in a Hawaiian shirt and boxer shorts, eating Ho-Ho's, and lamenting his failed bid for the presidency when it suddenly dawned on him, environmentalism could save him from a pathetic, cellulose-ridden retirement. If anything "dawned" on Gore, it was the fact he, like Jimmy Carter, could accomplish a lot more as an ex-politician than he could while he was still a public servant.

[liberalla]

7. I enjoy seeing positive words written about Mr. Gore but,

Friedman just pisses me off. What an ass.

"Iraq was always going to be hugely difficult, but the potential payoff of erecting a decent, democratizing government in the heart of the Arab world was also enormous."

If only that was what the neocons had wanted to do...

The ineptness, the incompetence was by design, and was criminal. IMO.