Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nancy Giles and Paul Krugman on Hardball. Finally saying the right thing.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Skarbrowe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-23-07 04:35 PM
Original message
Nancy Giles and Paul Krugman on Hardball. Finally saying the right thing.
This is maybe the third post I've started in all the years I've been on the DU. I just had to point out that Nancy Giles and Paul Krugman made so much sense, were so logical in explaining a big part of why the Democrats have been acting almost neutered since they won back both the House and Senate. I wish they could have had the whole hour.

Nancy Giles was fantastic. I remember her from China Beach. They both spoke about how fearful the Democrats were being because the right wing machine would label them unpatriotic and/or unAmerican if they did anything to stop this awful war. They didn't agree with what the Democrats were doing, they were just explaining that the Democrats did not sweep up a whole bunch of seats last November. Chris said they COULD cut-off funding and both Nancy and Paul quickly pointed out how the Republicans would spin that to death.

Anyway, it felt good to hear and see these people get a forum. Thanks Chris.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-23-07 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. I believe it is BS
The democrats are not afraid. They are COMPLICIT. period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skarbrowe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-23-07 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I can certainly understand people feeling that way.
No argument from me. I'm just coming from a point of wishful thinking. Kinda like a Cubs fan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-23-07 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. It seems like not only are they neutered, they go out of their way to carry water for the rightwing.
The backstabbing of MoveOn and Pete Stark are but two examples.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skarbrowe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-23-07 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. My first reaction to the play on words MoveOn used was a negative one.
I felt MoveOn had a great argument and a good question about what Petraeus might be doing, but, I didn't think they needed the play on words. I knew the Republicans would have a field day. You can't hand these people something that easy to attack. Taking it to the floor was just mind blowing. Also, in my personal opinion Rep. Stark was going great until he said "amusement". Words are extremely loaded. Use the wrong ones and you can destroy the whole perfectly valid point you were making.

It doesn't bother me that Stark apologized. It bothers me if he was forced. I don't think MoveOn should have done anything but what they did, move on with their fight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sampsonblk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-23-07 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Complicit out of fear
Its time to quit being scared and start fighting back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-23-07 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. complicit out of greed
they are beholden to the corporations that put them in office. Not us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-23-07 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. Ditto.
Complicit.

TC

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-23-07 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thanks for posting this. It's hard to get things through with such a slim majority, but
they have accomplished some important things. We need to elect more Democrats so that there is a bigger Democratic majority. Then we expect trsformational legislation. Until then, there are tricky coalitions to manage and fine lines that have to be walked.

It would be helpful if we all understood better how much power and what type of power is available to Speaker of the House and Senate majority leader when they have slim majorities.

As a democracy we should have a lot of dialogue and consider various viewpoints in legislation. Thought I'd like to think I'm always right, it's possible that other viewpoints would help me reach better decisions. Other viewpoints force me to think things through more thoroughly and more carefully. That is probably also true with a Democratic Congress.

In addition, people need to feel they've had some input into the process in order to support the result. If they feel they were ignored or "rolled over", they will not only not support it, they will actively work to sabotage it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skarbrowe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-23-07 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Yes. I do tend to think they are trying to keep their powder dry. But..
that can backfire if it goes on too long. And as you said, they are busy doing some things, just not having any success fighting the big fights with the smirky Dictator. Damn... I was trying not to get snarky. I think that most of us have such a hatred for George W. Bush that every lost fight between the Democrats and Bush cuts much deeper than it might under different circumstances. It was just good to hear someone address one of the main reasons the Democrats have been so stifled. It could also be that some of them are complicit in having a reason to keep this war going. I hope not. I realize that there are things going on at the top that would blow everyone's mind. All we can do is try and fight what we can see. I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Big Blue Marble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-23-07 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. The problem is not the size of the Democratic majority.
It is the size of the Republicans' megaphone and the effective way that they use it especially on talk radio.
The Dems have only had over twenty years to counter this effect, but remain ineffective and timid as rabbits.
What actually do they have to lose by standing up to the Republicans? Are they being controlled by consultants,
polls, and focus groups? They look desperate and on the run. They do not look ready to lead this country at
a time of the greatest multiple crises we have ever faced.

And what are they without their base? I for one am currently and completely alienated. I have proudly supported this party
since the 70's with my time, money, and my votes. No more time or money and they are really pushing me
hard on whether I will vote the ticket at the national level or go third party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skarbrowe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-23-07 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I am not happy with the Dems either, but I never want another "Bush" to
get through. The way our government is set up, I have no choice, well I do have a choice, but if I want to keep something like a Bush or a Guiliani out of office, I have to vote for the Democratic Party. I can't allow myself to think that the Dems have turned me off so completely that I will not vote for anyone or for a no-chance third party. Yep, they sure do have us over a barrell. I honestly believe things have changed drastically from 10 years ago or more about it not making that much difference what party is in office: that someone else is running everything anyway.

I remember being shocked when I found out Reagan had put a gag order on American doctors working in other countries. It was against the law to say the word abortion or suggest abortion in family planning. Excuse me if I am not remembering that correctly. My mind was blown because I couldn't figure out how they could tell someone, anyone, NOT to say a certain word. It was then I realized that it did make some kind of difference in what party had power. The Judicial branch is highly effected by the administration in charge. It will take years to try and undo the damage in what kind of judges have been appointed all over the country in the past six years.

No party is ever going to make everyone happy. Politics is a blood sport. heh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-23-07 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. It's counter-intuitive, but the answer is - More Democrats!
As long as the Republicans vote as a monolythic block, we can over-ride vetoes. The structural advantage the RW has in the traditional media is killing us. Matthews is pushing the simplistic line: "the people elected Democrats to stop the war and they haven't" lets Bush and the rubberstamping Republicans in Congress completely off the hook. The next time Matthews ask a Republican, "the American people demanded you stop the war based on the results of the last election....why are you continuing to support Bush and fund this illegal and immoral war?", I'll be shocked.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CCfromNY Donating Member (32 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-23-07 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
8. It's puzzling why...
...with the Republican party so in the toilet at this point in time,

that so many of these Democrats seem so reluctant to emphasize, let alone act on, their differences from the Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skarbrowe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-23-07 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Maybe those wiretaps worked in the Republicans favor.
Nah, I don't really think that. hmmmm The Democrats do need to raise their voice. They need to make some noise. They passed a raise in the minimum raise, they are working hard to insure children get healthcare and I think they should be pounding a way on what they want to do about Iraq. If the Democrats are sitting back and waiting for the war to continue to go badly to pick up seats in November '08, well then, that would be disturbing to say the least. Personally, I think they do see the difficulty in getting out of Iraq. Hopefully they are waiting ONLY to get complete control in Jan. 09 and then......what? I don't envy anyone inheriting the mess Bush has made.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-23-07 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Welcome to DU CC!
:toast: :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC