sniffa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-24-07 01:50 PM
Original message |
Poll question: who couLd have the greatest "anchors" in 08 eLections |
|
given the narrow majority the dems have, even with so many vuLnerabLe repubs, it's possibLe a gaLvanized repubLican GOTV couLd fuck everything up, if our candidate ends up sparking this, and dragging down the party.
so, which candidate is the most LikeLy to have the anchors affect?
|
cuke
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-24-07 01:51 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Do you realize that is Rove's argument? |
MADem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-24-07 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. That's precisely his argument--along with "Be very AFRAID, it MIGHT HAPPEN!! FEAR! FEAR!" nt |
Hydra
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-24-07 01:53 PM
Response to Original message |
|
otherwise we would win with a landslide, even if we nominated me...and a splinter of the repubs is looking at running their own 3rd party candidate, which could only help the Dem candidate.
|
bigwillq
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-24-07 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
Hydra
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-24-07 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
Heh, stranger things have happened, but I'm not 35 yet...although with the constitution in such tatters, why should an age requirement be an issue? :evilgrin:
|
bigwillq
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-24-07 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. I am not 35 yet either |
|
if so I would run and beat ya! :) :P ;)
|
sniffa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-24-07 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. you shouLdn't be so cocky about it |
|
it'LL make that Letdown so much harsher.
|
Hydra
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-24-07 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. I say again, election fraud |
|
The Repubs didn't win the White House in the last 4 presidential elections, so why should they be able to now? What are they offering that's different?
|
sniffa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-24-07 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
do you remember 2004? it wasn't that Long ago. we couLd have ran anyone, and bLown him away.
eLection fraud, schmeLection fraud. cockiness doesn't guarantee anything. what are they offering? they're not the dem. pretty much it. are you wiLLing to bank on that?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:48 AM
Response to Original message |