Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

We were all deceived about Obama's anti-gay Gospel Tour

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 10:34 AM
Original message
We were all deceived about Obama's anti-gay Gospel Tour
Edited on Mon Oct-29-07 10:50 AM by Kurt_and_Hunter
A lot of middle-of-the-road people at DU were sold a bill of goods. One side (supporters of human rights) was telling the truth while the other side (the Obama campaign) was spinning distortions about how the Obama fund-raiser was not a anti-gay event... no big deal... all blown out of proportion by some gay malcontents. The story that was peddled was that this was a staff error... an oversight... nobody knew McClurkin was a virulant bigot.

People in the middle went, "Gee... I can't immagine Obama would do that, so I will dismiss what the pro human-rights crowd is saying as just a bunch of supporters of other candidates lying about a good man."

Except we were not lying. McClurkin was chosen on purpose BECAUSE he is an outspoken bigot. The event was INTENDED to be an anti-gay event. It was DESIGNED to court the bigot vote by driving a wedge into the heart of the Democratic party. Obama is NOT a paragon who is above the very worst of the politics of wedge issues, division and courting hatred and ignorrance. DUers who did not follow tis story closely, digging into the details from the start, have been deceived.
_______________________
http://www.americablog.com/2007/10/obama-supporter-blasts-gays-at-gospel.html

UPDATE: Per the NYT, the anti-gay activist turned the entire final half hour of the concert into an anti-gay harangue:
The whole controversy might have been forgotten in the swell of gospel sound except Mr. McClurkin turned the final half hour of the three-hour concert into a revival meeting about the lightning rod he has become for the Obama campaign.

He approached the subject gingerly at first. Then, just when the concert had seemed to reach its pitch and about to end, Mr. McClurkin returned to it with a full-blown plea: “Don’t call me a bigot or anti-gay when I have suffered the same feelings,” he cried.

“God delivered me from homosexuality,” he added. He then told the audience to believe the Bible over the blogs: “God is the only way.” The crowd sang and clapped along in full support....

Mr. McClurkin’s support for Mr. Obama could signal to some black evangelical voters that race and religion are more important than Mr. Obama’s support for gay rights.

New York Times:
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/10/29/obamas-gospel-concert-tour
Surprise, surprise, surprise. Obama's anti-gay religious right activist used the opportunity Obama gave him last night to preach his hate to thousands of African-Americans. That's just great. And the white preacher who Obama picked to help explain to the audience that gays aren't minions of Satan? CNN reports that he said nothing at all - just a short little prayer, then he left. As for Obama, he did a taped introduction in which he praised McClurkin, the religious right activist, as one of his favorites. That's nice, because the way to help combat homophobia in the black community is to make sure the gay-basher is first endorsed by someone as high-ranking as Obama, who then chooses to say nothing about the gay-bashing.

So, in the end, Obama let his "best" and "favorite" artist slam gays to thousands of African-Americans, in his name, and neither he nor his hand-chosen white gay preacher said anything in response. Class act, that Obama campaign. For them, creating a "dialogue" means the gay-basher gets to spread his bigotry to thousands while the candidate and the token gay STFU.

And let's give a special shout out to the white gay preacher, Rev. Andy Sidden, who was supposed to be there defending our team. Here's how CNN reported his brave act of courage:
Sidden is the white, gay pastor added to the concert bill as a last minute compromise by the Obama campaign. Sidden's appearance was notably brief and anti-climactic: He said a short prayer to the auditorium at the very beginning of the program, when the arena was only about half full, and then he left.

Obama, while not present, appeared on a videotaped message to the crowd, saying, “The artists you’re going to hear from are some of the best in the world, and favorites of Michelle and myself.” McClurkin said during the concert that he had been introduced to Obama by Oprah Winfrey.

Wow, we could have invited a brick to give that heartfelt defense of gay people. Did Obama's people plan for Sidden to give his prayer when no one was there? Was Sidden asked by the Obama people not to say anything in defense of gays? Or did Sidden wimp out all by himself?
Atrios / Eschaton:
"Courting the Bigots ... This is just gross."
http://haloscan.com/tb/atrios/7440201094242774680

AmericaBlog:
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/10/29/obamas-gospel-concert-tour

New York Times:
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/10/29/obamas-gospel-concert-tour

CNN:
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/29/obama-supporter-god-delivered-me-from-homosexuality/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. K&R! for the hypocrisy of Obama and his supporters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKNancy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. hey, don't do that
Obama supporters had nothing to do with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. They have plenty do do with trying to defend such a stupid action here on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKNancy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #8
35. Maybe this post will make a difference
as I read down-thread, I think so.
I thought is was mismanagement and a bad campaign staff.
I've always been leery of Obama's "preachiness", but never did I think he would do something like this.
( I'm not an Obama supporter..never was)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nvme Donating Member (486 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #35
156. Not again
Edited on Mon Oct-29-07 02:39 PM by nvme
Fcuk every mfing time! I had hopes with slick willy. Then came "don't ask don't tell". I saw the marriage thing in Hawaii, Then came DOMA. I had hopes for Obama. I sent money, Attend his things in Miami,sent more money,encouraged my friends to open their mind to Barak. I raised hell and started writing and avoiding all sponsors of RUSH Show When He played, "Barak the magic Negro". I cringed When I read about Mc Clurkin on his tour. Now I am Devistated, To read this closet queen is spouting gods cure(let me tell you: It wont be long before she is popped doing the senator Craig soft shoe tap dance), I just can't take this utter-disillusionment.
I just wanted to be able to get a fiancee VISA for my Venezuelan partner. I just want to be an American in the same line as everyone else. I dont care about hetro relationships. I promise not to let my gay juices or oils that i secrete from my skin leech into the water supply.
I Promise i wont rub off. Just let me live in peace. I will drink from a seperate fountain. just let me get spousal benefits. I will give up my seat to the hetro couple. If I can get survivorship rights. I will use the rear entrance(no pun intended, but hey, it works) if i can just have my lover at my side. I will not engage in lewd behavior in the middle of restaurants. I will confine my faerie dust to my own household, just let me be.
I feel more and more like bacteria that CAN be cured. GOD BLESS AMERICA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #156
185. darling
:hug:

you need do none of the above to deserve all of the above

this old 50something white married hetro lady is working for your rights

you are not alone shouting into the wilderness :grouphug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nvme Donating Member (486 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #185
225. Thanks.
I needed that hug.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #5
57. You do realize who you're replying to...
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
184. But, but... Obama danced with Ellen!!
That means he likes the gays again, right?
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackBeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #184
201. Look over here:
dangling shiny keys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
50. K & R for the shamelessness of Obama's rivals.
:thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nedsdag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
75. So supporting Obama makes me anti-gay?
Well, supporting Hillary makes you a hypocrite. It was Hillary who had an African American minister weigh in on his feelings towards gays. It was Hillary's husband who signed DOMA and "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" and she kept quiet.

If I'm a hypocrite William769, then you are a complete "Uncle Tom" in the gay community.

Flame away at me if you must. I DON'T CARE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #75
76. You got that right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #76
92. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #92
98. And how am I a hypocrite?
I would love to hear this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #98
106. Please don't rise to the bait. Let this post stay unlocked.
If it becomes a flame-war it will get locked and evening folks will miss the message, so please let the few fire-starters go un-answered.

Thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #106
109. Well when attacked by a bigot I tend to take the offense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nedsdag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #109
124. I'M NOT A BIGOT!
But how can you support a woman who has REFUSED to refute DOMA?

I'm waiting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #124
127. Thats funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nedsdag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #127
130. Typical Hillary doublespeak:
"Clinton went on to defend both DOMA and her decision not to speak during the marriage amendment debate this past June, and in fact linked the two. She said that without being able to point to the U.S. law which bars federal recognition of gay marriage and allows states to similarly refuse to acknowledge such unions from other states, many more members of Congress would have voted to amend the Constitution, especially when that effort had its first vote two years ago."

The more things change, the more things stay the same.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #130
131. You call it doublespeak.
So what do you call Obama?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nedsdag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #131
136. You know it's sad when Giuliani shows more tolerance
for the gay community than "your girl" has.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #136
137. Care to back that up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTLawGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #130
157. Hillary's statement is a load of crap
If we could have stopped DOMA, then we would not have been able to stop an amendment, that requires a greater % of yes votes????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
urgk Donating Member (982 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #130
250. This isn't doublespeak, it's plain as day --
From "All in the family - Hillary Rodhan Clinton supports Defense of Marriage Act"
Advocate, The, Feb 15, 2000
"She broke ranks with her husband by opposing his "don't ask, don't tell" policy, but when it comes to gay marriage, first lady Hillary Rodhan Clinton is standing by her man. Clinton, who is seeking the Democratic nomination for the U.S. Senate from New York State, said January 10 that she opposes same-sex marriage. She also said she would have voted for the Defense of Marriage Act, a bill passed by Congress in 1996 that prevents federal recognition of same-sex marriage. "Marriage has got historic, religious, and moral content that goes back to the beginning of time, and I think a marriage is as a marriage has always been, between a man and a woman," Clinton said."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mark414 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #98
113. because Hillary has 'shown off' her support from anti-gay ministers as well
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #113
114. Link.
And please don't show the lame link where she attended a function that was hosted by someone else that was to help the inner city.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mark414 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #114
121. here you go
the author, quite obviously has an agenda, but everything that is said is supported with facts

http://www.thebarackobamareport.com/the_barack_obama_report/2007/10/is-human-rights.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #121
128. You link to a Obama fan site?
Forgive me If I need something a little more concrete given recent revaluations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #128
135. Here's a link:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #135
139. And?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 02:06 AM
Response to Reply #139
233. and here's another link
(i just want to toss this one in here--i think it's rather "telling")
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mark414 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #128
187. which links to numerous reputable news sources
Edited on Mon Oct-29-07 05:17 PM by mark414
to prove something called "facts"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #75
223. It more likely means you just don't take anti-gay shit too seriously.
Surprise!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKNancy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. Six "recs" and no responses
I think I know why. As I read your post, all I could think of was "Oh dear".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. There really isn't anything to say. We said it all last week and were
talked down to by Obama supporters like we were children. We got it then and we get it now. We know who Obama is and how he operates - there isn't much more to say...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
3. the more I learn about this
the more disillusioned I become. That an allegedly progressive Democrat would do this is ... ? I can't even think of the word.

It's the Republican Politics of Hate and Religion from the Democrat who promised us the Politics of Hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jahyarain Donating Member (254 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
129. It's the Republican Politics of Hate and Religion from the Democrat who promised us the Politics of
GOD DAMN, IF THAT DIDN'T SUM IT ALL UP! and the reason dems will lose progressives and real liberals. at least we know the piggies r lying 2 us. dems still pretend they're not while going along their merry way not doing a FUCKING thing 2 stop what the piggies do. they're just as bad and the reason dems will lose. fuck the pigs. and fuck the dems. third party or Revolution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
4. great post
I am beyond disappointed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Basileus Basileon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
7. Sad to watch Obama do this. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftCoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
9. This makes me ill
Has Obama condemned this yet? This is just outrageous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. Condemned it?! He announced McClurkin as his favorite singer!
McClurkin - and his message of hate - was the spotlight of the entire event.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merbex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #14
120. To say McClurkin was one of his favorite singers is like saying
Leni Riefenstahl is someone whose Directing ability we admire ...

It's hard, if not impossible, to separate the "artistic" ability from what they represent.

Bad, bad, move by Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #9
20. He sponsored it. Condemn it? Not Likely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #9
21. How could he condemn it?
Seriously... this event was planned as an anti-gay event. If Obama condemns it for being what he designed it to be it would just be piling lies upon lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #21
26. Here-Here!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
10. Just to clarify this for everyone:
This isn't a Clinton/Obama issue. Not at all. This is a human rights/civil rights/equal rights issue. Obama made this bed all by himself. I do not support Clinton, but I have now written Obama off, completely...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #10
17. I have been accused numerous times that I am going ape shit over this because I support. Hillary.
Edited on Mon Oct-29-07 10:52 AM by William769
Let's forget the fact I am a Homosexual. That has absolutely nothing to do with the issue at hand. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youthere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #17
45. Well, I can tell you I am not a Hillary supporter..
and was leaning Obama, and I am extremely disappointed by this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #17
252. Hillary is NOT the best friend that gays have in this race...
by any means. Neither is Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libnnc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #10
78. That's exactly right. And Obama should have known better.
Edited on Mon Oct-29-07 12:02 PM by libnnc
This argument that it was handled poorly because he and his team "didn't know" or "weren't aware" is bull fucking shit. Obama's not dumb. He knows that the black church isn't the same as it was 30+ years ago.

Dr. King's church and vision isn't the message that gets put on the tee-vee anymore.

That message of civil and social justice doesn't make the big bucks. TD Jakes and "sinner-centered" preaching is what sells CDs and books and air time on the television.

If Obama is going to play the "church as the historic purveyor of social justice card", he needs to PICK THE RIGHT CHURCH TO ALIGN HIMSELF WITH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #78
119. Amen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #10
247. My feelings exactly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
11. I was not deceived. I recognized bigotry and spoke out about it.
Some folks on DU owe some of us apologies this morning. But that's not really important. What's important is to redouble defense of human rights.

Efforts to soft pedal bigotry will always fail because bigotry is wrong. It's ugly, it's mean, it's life-destroying, it leads to violence and extermination. It's indefensible.

Bigotry is always indefensible. Don't forget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. I wish I could recommend your response!
:thumbsup: :applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. Thank you! I feel the same about yours just above mine!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackBeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #11
22. An apology?
Edited on Mon Oct-29-07 10:59 AM by JackBeck
Good luck! I've asked and I am still waiting for one from DUers who said that the NJ civil union decision was going to help the Democrats lose in 2006.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Froward69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #11
77. Thank you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avrdream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #11
163. I just never expected that the bigotry would come from Obama himself.
I understand your post about doubling our efforts but I'm also quite disappointed about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
12. VERY. BAD. DECISION-MAKING.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
15. Disgusted Obama supporter checking in.
I really don't know what to say, except that I am extremely angry at his campaign right now.

Either they have the most incompetent asses in the history of modern campaigning running the show in SC or, well, I don't know.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #15
23. I think you do know.
Edited on Mon Oct-29-07 10:54 AM by MNDemNY
This was a conscious decision by BHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #15
25. Thanks for checking in. Showed guts.
We have to stand together on human rights, period. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomKoolzip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #15
30. Yeah, me too. VERY disgusted Obama supporter here.
As of this morning, Obama can go screw himself. THis is bullshit. Up until I read this, I assumed Obama himself might distance his campaign from McClurkin's moral ugliness - it is not so, and frankly, he has lost my support completely now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #30
59. Sincere comiserations
All I would add is that the determination and joy that you, I and others feel a political campaign is real. It is by no means wasted. It is not lost as it springs from the best roots of our humanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #15
32. I appreciate and will remember your honesty.
I guess it gets to a point where it is futile to keep spinning positive a bad situation. I also understand why you wanted to think the best of your candidate. PLease don't take it personal that i am so PISSED. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #15
34. It wasn't incompetence -- it was pandering. They wanted it to be
subtle (wink, wink, if you do not approve of homosexuality, we kinda understand) but lost control over it -- that's the incompetent part. I was never an Obama supporter (I did think he was too inexperienced) but I liked him a lot, and now I am afraid I don't like him as much. This was unforgivable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackBeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #34
36. They lost control because us "uppity queers" and our supporters
Saw right through to the heart of what really was going on.

I liked the man, too, and hopefully he's learned something from this event.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #36
40. Hope so too -- but he needs to say something very dramatic and even
if his handlers object to it for many of us to believe that he really did learn something from it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FedUp_Queer Donating Member (679 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #36
147. Yes, how DARE we?
All us faggots have the unmitigated gall to call a wolf in sheep's clothing what he is...a WOLF! I don't support Hillary (DOMA, DADT) or Obama. Looks like, as so often, we are going to come around to the all inspiring realization that: "Well, Candidate X (the Democrat) is better than Candidate Y (the Republican)." Wow, I am so inspired. Wow, I can't wait to hit the pavement. Wow, I can't wait to be able to have hope of sponsoring my partner of 7 years. Gee, I am absolutely beside myself with glee. Is there a principled candidate in the house? Buehler? Buehler?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #147
224. Well, yes, as a matter of fact
Dennis Kucinich supports full marriage equality and has for many years. The frontrunners are the frontrunners because they aren't too threatening to the MSM or the white/hetero supremacy (and pro-corporation) philosophy that far too many registered voters still adhere to.

One day we will have the people-powered on the ground organization to do an end run around them--don't give up on building it now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 05:34 AM
Response to Reply #147
237. Exactly my feelings, too
I voted for Kucinich in the last primary and it looks as if he will get my vote again. The rest of them are a pack of pandering liars. I was hoping this crop would be better. What a joke.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenfrequed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #237
255. I agree
Dennis is the most progressive candidate running on all counts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #15
38. Classy response, and it's cool (in my eyes) to support him
My issue is the presentation of Obama as something other than a politician... being on a moral plane above the other candidates.

They are all ambitious people who compromise moral values to win. Hillary voted for Kyl?Lieberman because she expects a nail-biter race against Guliani in Florida. John Edwards is running around encouraging people to trust their "instincts" as to whether a black or a woman can win.

These people are ALL ruthless, ambitious politicians. That's the name of the game. Looking for moral superiority in politicians is like looking for humanity in trench warfare. It exists, on occasion, but is not the point of the exercise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #38
39. I'll give the campaign a chance to respond to this.
McClurkin is enough of a narcissistic asshole that I can believe this was entirely improvised.

But, the campaign needs to throw his ass under the bus.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #38
52. I totally agree with your analysis but here's the sad part. While
Obama was never my choice, my two daughters who are barely of voting age are (were?) Obama girls. They assumed that he was cool, and very progressive, and not your traditional politician. I was hoping he wouldn't disappoint them but now my heart aches for their sake -- and for the sake of all the other idealistic young people who thought they finally found the candidate they could so enthusiastically support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #52
146. As an older person
I certainly remember putting candidates on pedestals. It can take quite a few elections before you start understanding the pandering that goes on in every election campaign---moreso the higher the stakes. I just have to decide which values are the most important to me and what are deal-breakers. But that is what upsets me the most about Obama---the image he projected of progressiveness and the promise of bringing something new to the executive office. This type of thing (McCurkin's inclusion) engenders cynicism. I'm sorry your girls are learning this hard lesson so soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #15
43. Well if the campaign responds
Edited on Mon Oct-29-07 11:21 AM by seasonedblue
I'll listen, but the time for condemnation was before he let this guy MC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #43
118. Agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #15
48. I'm present and absolutely disgusted. Its so much easier to slime than to
laud your candidate's accolades. Tells me a great deal about who our opponents are and it's not all positive. Yet, if they win, they'll wonder why we don't fall all over ourselves to kiss and make up with "the victor."

Power and campaigning with "blunt force objects" such as whisper campaigns and smears doesn't make one's opponent more attractive. I suspect that I know the source of these smears and they all hold "hidden agendas" for a rival candidate. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #48
74. And you never smeared another candidate?
Yea right! :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #74
82. Don't fall into the trap William.
Edited on Mon Oct-29-07 12:06 PM by seasonedblue
A smear is a lie, and this is a condemnation of a real event.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #74
88. Well, yes I have. However, I've not made it a "dedicated hobby" like many non-Obama supporters ...
yet, I'm not without the "sin of smear." ;)

However, I find it unfortunate that my learned opposition expend extensive amounts of energy on such tactics.

There is such a thing as being a "sore winner." In my not so humble opinion. :blush:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #88
95. Have you ever heard of a pissed off Queen?
Well if you haven't, all you have to do is look at my posts about this subject. When someone attacks me personally (yes I took this personally), they are going to receive nothing but my wrath.

And who's a sore winner? The Bigot spoke, he was applauded and the fight goes on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nedsdag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #95
101. Well, I'm taking you on.
Be a pissed off Queen all you want. Obama has a good record on all issues yet you're taking ONE issue and hammering him on the head on this.

Go ahead. Vote for Hillary. If you don't think she's taking the gay vote for granted then you're horribly mistaken. She'll do something in office that will piss you off so bad then when it's time for re-election, you'll be voting for her again. Mark my word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #101
103. Go ahead take me on.
Edited on Mon Oct-29-07 12:32 PM by William769
If she ever did what Obama did. I would disavow her in a heartbeat!

Your appeasement of what Obama has done says volumes about you. Playing the African American card here won't work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nedsdag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #103
126. Neither is playing the "angry queer" card.
If you supported someone like Kucinich or even Biden, then I would show you some respect.

You lost my respect with your support of Mrs. Clinton and her support of Rev. Mayberry.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #126
133. I believe it's the other way around.
Did she tour with him? Is she using him at concerts to make money? Is she using him to pander to Christian conservatives?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nedsdag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #133
138. She pandered when she took the photograph with him.
She pandered when she praised him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #138
141. What photohraph?
What did she praise him for?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
urgk Donating Member (982 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #133
251. "Is she using him to pander to Christian conservatives?" Yes.
His endorsement is on her website. Which, it seems, people in this thread keep trying to ignore.

"Senator Clinton has an excellent concept about how she plans to address issues surrounding crime and education. She described how she has partnered with leaders in New York to create a charter school specifically for African American men and notes that the Allen Cathedral AME Church charter school in Jamaica Queens, New York could be used as a model of how to help educate African American young men. Her mentioning of the school shows that she's aware of outstanding successful examples of education in this country. The way she addressed the need for the federal government to partner with inner cities suggests that she's not just focusing on international issues but that she's concerned with domestic ones - particularly crime and violence in our communities. I want a president who knows how to strike a balance between addressing international and domestic challenges facing this country," said Reverend Dr. Harold R. Mayberry, Senior Pastor of First African Methodist Episcopal Church and Chairperson of Network for Interfaith Action.

http://www.hillaryclinton.com/news/release/view/?id=2857
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #95
102. Wow, Just "WOW"
I have no idea where your anger from the above post comes from, but I don't even want to scratch the surface of uncovering why you choose to take it out on a very honorable candidate.

Damn - there's something under the surface that has NOTHING to do with Obama's Campaign - even that nasty people who are homo-phobic.

Something more - and I don't want to know.

I hope you are able to see through this and have a good day.

BUT I'm OUT - here! :wow: :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #102
104. Calling Obama honorable?
Edited on Mon Oct-29-07 12:25 PM by William769
If I was you, I'd be outta here also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #104
169. Just to let you know William..
Edited on Mon Oct-29-07 03:57 PM by Tellurian
CNN just did a rehash of McCloset headlining Obama's Gospel Tour. They conceded McCloset had no affect on drawing a larger crowd than wouldn't have attended in the first place. If this flap hadn't become such an issue at primarily a Democratic event, I believe the upshot of it all was Obama was hoping to draw a majority of Republicans as crossover voters.

I'm convinced, the whole event was staged to appease Republicans in hopes of garnering their votes even at the expense of Obama's GLBT Community of supporters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BronxBoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #169
188. I have a little bit different take on this....
Keep in mind that Obama has in no way, shape or form solidified Black support behind his campaign. And the reasons for this are being discussed in depth within the Black community. There have been several high profile endorsements of candidates other than Obama from prominent Black officials. I'm not a political strategist but it would seem that if Obama were to be successful in his quest for the nomination, he would have to handily carry the Black vote. So if this was some sort of political machination and I don't know if it was, it was more likely aimed at Conservative BLACK voters and not republicans. He has to shore up support among a constituency that he really needs and regardless of how you may feel about it, the Black church still holds a lot of sway over recommending who their congregations should vote for.

I still maintain that the real story here is not McClurkin per se but the exposure being put on Black intolerance for homosexuality. Keep in mind that there is pretty much universal support within our community for Obama's decision and quite frankly, for McClurkin. When I heard this issue being discussed on Black talk radio, there was either overt approval of the decision to have him appear or a pooh-poohing of how Gays felt about this matter. I think that is the larger issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #188
191. I appreciate your viewpoint..
I was reiterating what was reported on cnn as the "word" on the effect or non effect of McClurkin's headlining and mc'ing Obama's weekend Gospel Tour. McClurkin was a guest entertainer for a Bush event in 04' and seemed to be a necessary component for Obama's gospel weekend (because he refused to remove him in spite of protests from the gay community). In other words, McClurkin was a representative example Obama was promoting as the Republican version seen as acceptable of the GLBT Community to garner the Republican crossover vote. imo...Obama's plan backfired because as reported by cnn, the crossover Republicans never materialized at the event.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #188
196. Thank you, BB.
Edited on Mon Oct-29-07 07:24 PM by Karenina
It would seem Obama DECIDED to step on this third rail. I grew up in NYC and we, as kids, KNEW that with one false move the "cover" would not protect us and in that event, we'd be FRIED.

Oprah may have "endorsed" him, but so far her "peep" hasn't done him any favors. I am unable to see the whole debacle as anything other than DELIBERATE, calculated pandering to the most ignorant, brainwashed, self-righteous, bigoted segment of the community. AND I am LIVID at his ill-use of Andy Sidden while reinforcing the "invisibility" of the black LGBT community. Talk about a DOUBLE GOLDEN SHOWER!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 12:23 PM
Original message
"Sore winner"? I'm sorry, but I think that's a load!
The way things played out, I think EVERYONE on the Democratic side of the fence LOST! One of our brightest stars, in the eyes of most, was willing to throw a significant segment of the base under the bus to score some cheap pandering points, and it's all out there for the world to view...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chovexani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
168. Seriously
"Winner?" WHo the fuck won in this except the bigots and homophobes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #15
123. I'm impressed by this, gt.
This took major guts on your part to post and I appreciate it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
18. Obama let us down.
So much less than he claimed to be. I ignored this for awhile, hoping it was a distorted story, but it is clear now. Obama let the ex-gay preach for an hour, talking about how the lord can deliver you from homosexuality. THis is far worse than Richardson thinking its a choice.

Obama---you dropped the ball.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #18
27. Kicked the ball...out of bounds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. Well said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
24. Well, I'd like to say I'm sorry to all those who felt thrown under the bus by ME.
Edited on Mon Oct-29-07 10:59 AM by jenmito
Unless Obama speaks out against what McBigot did by preaching that BS, I'll be very disappointed in him. I really thought he'd ONLY be singing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #24
55. Thank you
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #55
56. No problem! When you're wrong you're wrong...
and I was wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mark Twain Girl Donating Member (410 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
28. "The artists you’re going to hear from are some of the best in the world"
Edited on Mon Oct-29-07 10:57 AM by Mark Twain Girl
"The artists you're going to hear from are some of the best in the world, and favorites of Michelle and myself."

That is what's getting me. Somewhat wrote that this bigot was chosen for his bigotry, not in spite of it. I tend to agree.

Oh, and this:

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/29/obama-supporter-god-delivered-me-from-homosexuality/

"Meanwhile, Obama staff were inside and outside the building, working the crowd and trying to register new voters."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
31. Barry didn't/doesn't disappoint me one little bit. I expect this shit
from the guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
33. This is why I felt regardless of the adjustments McClurkin should have been dumped outright. . .
. . .while I maintain my support of the Obama campaign and I will defend Obama's overall record on gay rights, I continue to be disappointed in how this controversy was handled.

I knew McClurkin would exploit the fact that he felt persecuted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
37. Shame on Barack. I would have expected a black man to be more sensitive
to hatred, bigotry, and discrimination.

But apparently not.

He will not get my vote if he gets the nomination, and I suspect this ill conceived move has lost him a great deal of support.

If I wanted another anti-gay bigot in the White House, I'd vote Republican!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #37
41. Your expectation was unreasonable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #41
54. Yeah, heaven forbid I would expect a BLACK DEMOCRAT
to want fairness and equality for everyone!

Bad me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #54
64. Expecting someone who has experienced such and such
to understand so and so is not reasonable. It is a conclusion I've drawn after many stunning disappointments. Some do, and SOME. JUST. D/Won't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobbieo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #37
62. I don't support any of the top three candidates But
if Obama gets the nomination I will not vote at all or vote for the Repuke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Froward69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #62
80. That is the opinion of
A huge number of undecideds as well!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soleft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
42. I was inclined to support Obama until this.
I also think that Hillary's big throw us under the bus moment could be in the offing at any moment.

Should Obama or Hillary get the nomination, I will vote for them to prevent the republicans from keeping the White House.

Also, I think the Ameriblog headline is misleading. I'm not sure McClurkin can be characterized as a campaign spokesman. Unless he's been called that by the campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
44. K&R. I knew this was going to happen
Anything for the votes. Screw the LGBT community. They aren't important.

To hell with that. :puke:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bicentennial_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #44
46. Will they ever listen to us?!
x(

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #46
61. I don't know
But I won't shut up. :hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackBeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #44
49. Many of us did know.
And we will continue to shine a light on every instance of bigotry, regardless if others "get it".

We're "uppity" and "hysterical". Gotta live up to the characterizations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MuseRider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #49
60. "Uppity"
I say hooray for the "uppity" LGBT's. You gotta be. If you are not "uppity" this kind of shit wins. From now on I will consider myself and "uppity ally" and screw anyone who does not like it. Like you I suspected this was going on but wanted to believe otherwise. Obama had to know, he HAD to know that his "equality" platform would never hold after something like this. If he did not then the man has been given too much credit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #49
66. Well, as we've been told
We need to fight for our rights, so that's what we'll do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #49
171. Another uppity and hysterical queer here
and proud of it! :)

:hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #44
65. I wonder if that nasty DU Obama supporter who wanted to
"spit on us" is going to eat crow or if she is going to keep on making excuses for this shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackBeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #65
69. Could it have been this one?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #69
71. nope, but THAT is good news, too, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #71
81. Oops I thought you were talking about this one:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackBeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #71
87. Yikes!
I believe I've had a few run-ins with that one. Wonder if they've got anything to say today about this sordid affair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #87
122. I have, too. Put that one on ignore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #71
150. That should be alerted on as a Generalized Attack on many DUers
That post was against the rules before, and in light of today's news, is completely beyond the pale.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #69
73. Oh thank god.
Edited on Mon Oct-29-07 11:50 AM by seasonedblue
She was one nasty piece of work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackBeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #73
215. And there we have it.
Glad I'm not alone in my assessment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #69
174. That is one tombstone I Am VERY glad to see
I wasn't aware he/she had gone bye-bye. Good to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackBeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #174
216. You and me both.
Good riddance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sapphocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #65
70. I guess we'll never know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #70
72. although THAT is a beautiful sight to see. i was referring to
Edited on Mon Oct-29-07 11:50 AM by jonnyblitz
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #72
152. Thanks for the link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #65
83. I won't know
I'm ignoring that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #65
158. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #158
161. Oh, go take an obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #161
165. go out and take a big breath of fresh air
Edited on Mon Oct-29-07 03:37 PM by AtomicKitten
and open you eyes

This is a much bigger world than just sniveling on the internets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
47. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastic cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
51. It was down to Obama or Edwards for me. I guess I've had my choice made for me. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #51
53. Well Edwards is someone I can't support in the primary,
so it's down to Biden, Clinton or Dodd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
58. Atrocious decision-making
I don't know how many votes Obama thought he would get by pandering to the bigots and proudly including this ass in his fundraiser, but he lost my vote. "Audacity of Hope", my fucking ass.....more like "Audacity of Audacity"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Froward69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #58
84. I Agree.
Obama is the best orator of the pack. but his actions are questionable. He can make me cry with patriotism. then again so could Hitler. not to draw those two together politically. but to point out Hitler was a great orator also. both have the power of persuasion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elidor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #58
91. I think Atrios said it best:
"The audacity of homophobia."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
63. does obama get a kickback from increased mcclurkin cd sales? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CyberPieHole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
67. Kick and recommend #28 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
68.  Not Only Did He Throw Gays Under the Bus, He is Doing Great Damage to the Democratic Party
There has been a very well-organized and well-funded campaign to turn the black community against gays.
(Organized by whom? We can only guess, but it smells like Rove's handiwork).

Blacks and gays have been core consituancies of the Democratic Party for years, and we need both to win.

It is beyond disappointing that Barak Obama is actively participating in driving a wedge between blacks and gays!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #68
117. Truly, you should post that as a separate thread.
It is insightful and true, the damage that has been done or attempted is disgraceful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #68
153. I agree. We see that wedge appearing right here on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
79. Note the absence of McClurkin apologists from this thread. nm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #79
89. Maybe because there are no McClurkin apologists...
Edited on Mon Oct-29-07 12:14 PM by jenmito
I apologized, however, above, to those who felt thrown under the bus by my support of Obama's choice...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #89
96. Umm, sure there are
Some of them aren't even Obama supporters. One in particular goes around to every thread saying "McClurkins quotes have been taken out of context!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #96
105. Oh, OK...
I missed that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #89
143. Well....there used to be
Kind of hard to be an apologist now, I would think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #79
90. Nuthin' but crickets chirp chirp........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #90
115. Even crickets wouldn't support Obama's handing of the McClurkin fiasco
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
85. I was fooled...
I was certain all along that it was a poor campaign operation not a deliberate strategy...which is why I have criticized Obama's campaign, but not his views towards gays on this...

Guess I was wrong!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlaxieB Donating Member (359 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #85
94. Hillary Supporter - Expected nothing less from you. Well you need to feel the same way about
Mulberry and Hillary then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #94
97. What campaign event of Hillarys did Mulberry MC?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #97
108. Please don't rise to the bait. Let this post stay unlocked.
If it becomes a flame-war it will get locked and evening folks will miss the message, so please let the few fire-starters go un-answered.

Thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #94
107. Surely you can see the difference...
I didn't criticize Obama for accepting the support of someone like McClurkin...of course the party needs to engage those that disagree, and those we may find offensive in some ways...I have no problem with that as it allows us to expose them to a different view...

However to put someone like McClurkin in such a high profile position, representing your campaign to a group of voters in such a public way is an entirely different thing...and I think you realize that...

I initially viewed this as a campaign error and improper vetting...

That apparently is not true, Obama...unless he comes out strongly against this, is clearly pandering to the anti-gay bigotry of a sector of the party for their votes...

No different than Republican strategy to pander to the racism of southerners in the 1960's and antu-gay bigotry of the 90's and 2000's

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CyberPieHole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
86. Great post...
I hope Obama is pleased with himself. I, for one, never believed McClurkin was "just going to sing one song". But it never even occurred to me that he would MC. And then to use the stage to preach his bigotry and homophobia?!!! Well, he was probably preaching to the choir.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlaxieB Donating Member (359 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
93. Let me get this right a person is a bigot is he states he is no longer gay
DAMN. That is something I never heard of before. That is Deep Shit.

“Don’t call me a bigot or anti-gay when I have suffered the same feelings,” he cried.

“God delivered me from homosexuality,” he added. He then told the audience to believe the Bible over the blogs: “God is the only way.” The crowd sang and clapped along in full support....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #93
99. What is deep shit is if you are trolling here for sympathy for your bigoted campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #99
110. Please don't take the bait
This is a valuable thread. Don't let a few fire-starters turn it into a flame-war
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #93
111. you know, I doubt I could ever be so obsessed over a fucking
politician so damn INTENSELY as to get so pathetically CRAVEN as some of you do in your support. There is NO WAY you can make excuses for this mess no matter how hard you try to grasp at straws. Give it up soon unless you don't mind looking like a complete FOOL. Thankfully not all Obama supporters are so DAMN far gone and admit this is NOT good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #111
116. It's total Bush-cultist style mentality.
This poster should recognize the symptoms and seek help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #93
132. Promoting the notion that someone can be "cured" of their gayness...
Edited on Mon Oct-29-07 01:04 PM by SaveElmer
Is straight out of the right wing playbook. Convince someone it is a disease, or a mental illness, or some form of abnormality rather than what it actually is, the innate way some people are born...then you have a built in excuse to continue discrimination...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #93
154. If you don't understand how deeply offensive that is, then you probably think
that racial cleansing is just fine, too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
100. This PFLAGer knew about McClurkin from the beginning ..
Edited on Mon Oct-29-07 12:20 PM by Maat
and knew what he would do; I believe Obama was fully aware of what he would do.

Take action! Support the organization that addresses the 'ex-gay' nonsense: www.truthwinsout.org !!

Take action! Support the only candidate who has stood strong for marriage equality, Dennis Kucinich. Dennis K needs money to run his campaign. Donate now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
112. Completely destroys what many had offered as a defense of the whole debacle.
"He's only there to sing"

"Obama isn't going to speak"

"See? Inclusion of the (white) gay minister makes it all better!"

I'm terribly sad that the worst of our fears played out. I had held out hope that maybe Obama's defenders were right, it wasn't going to be so bad. So much for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
125. K&R - from straight but not narrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
134. And plenty of DUers were saying McCurkin would just be singing gospel
A true bigot who thinks he's under "God"'s directive to convert the LGBT community is NOT going to waste his big moment to preach his message of hate. And Obama gave him that moment of opportunity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zazzle Donating Member (220 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #134
180. Yes - that's why I support John Edwards!!
and denounce all those who've spread the lies that he called gays "those people."
Democrats are some of the most easily influenced - and Bob Shrum who wrote that about Edwards per his 1998 senate campaign - is part of the DC Hillary establishment!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
140. Sidden was a useless addition
Is this performance going to other towns? It will be interesting to see if Obama's people make some changes in the show after this opening debacle. Whatever...what's done is done. Bye, bye, 'Bama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #140
142. I can't believe Sidden spoke to a half-empty hall then left
That's barely even tokenism... it's more like a technicality. "It was inclusive. We had a gay performer during the sound-check."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
144. Obama is a loser but his supporters should not be judged to this point.
It's the politics of personal loyalty.

People see hope in someone, like Obama, who is charismatic and has a good grab and pitch. He/she may or may not be the real deal. In Obama's case, he was anti-war, damn, that's a great recommendation. So people project their hopes and values on to the icon and away we go. The Obama supporters here were hoping that he was "the one." And they provided information, for the most part, that they were given. I'm sure that there are some Obama staffers here but most are good people who made a judgment that didn't work out (the personal loyalty to politician judgments never work out).

I like this post a great deal when it comes to the obvious lies Obama tells, the worst kind.

But his supporters deserve the benefit of the doubt.

K*R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #144
148. The legit supporters are cool
The few intentionally hateful smear-and-distract damage control operatives are a another matter entirely, but they have ended up hurting their candidate more than any opposing campaign ever could, so there is some justice in that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #144
151. Not his supporters who wanted to "spit in some faces" here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
urgk Donating Member (982 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #144
159. Obama on McClurkin.
I present the following:

“I strongly disagree with Reverend McClurkin’s views and will continue to fight for these rights as president of the United States to ensure that America is a country that spreads tolerance instead of division,” Obama said in a statement.

http://blogs.reuters.com/trail08/2007/10/23/obama-takes-heat-from-gays-on-gospel-tour/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #159
162. Yes, that was 10/23. Then he turned around and had McClurkin MC!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #159
166. “I strongly disagree with Reverend McClurkin’s views and will continue to showcase them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #159
173. Having your cake and eating it too
Isn't that how the saying goes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
urgk Donating Member (982 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #173
245. Is Obama's political record his cake or the eating it part?
(according to http://lesbianlife.about.com/od/lesbianactivism/p/BarackObama.htm)

Barack Obama's Political Background: Barack Obama was elected to the Illinois State Senate in 1996. He served for eight years and ran for United States Senate in 2004. His speech at the Democratic National Convention that year brought America's attention to this liberal political newcomer. He won the election easily over arch-conservative Alan Keyes.
Barack Obama in the Illinois Senate: Barack Obama was known as a liberal who was not afraid to build bridges across party lines during his term in the Illinois State Senate. He gained a 100% rating from Planned Parenthood for his support of family planning and abortion rights legislation.

Barack Obama and Gay Rights in Illinois: Barack Obama supported gay rights during his Illinois Senate tenure. He sponsored legislation in Illinois that would ban discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.

Barack Obama in the United States Senate: Every two years the Human Rights Campaign, the largest national gay and lesbian organization, issues a scorecard for members of the Senate based on their sponsorship and voting on key issues of importance to gay and lesbian citizens. Barack Obama scored 89 out of 100% in the 2006 scorecard. Here's how HRC rated Barack Obama:

Barack Obama on Hate Crimes: Barack Obama co-sponsored legislation to expand federal hate crimes laws to include crimes perpetrated because of sexual orientation and gender identity.
Employment Non-Discrimination: Barack Obama supports the Employment Non-Discrimination Act and believes it should be expanded to include sexual orientation and gender identity.

Don't Ask, Don't Tell - Gays in the Military: Barack Obama believes we need to repeal the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy and allow gays and lesbians to serve openly in the military. His campaign literature says, "The key test for military service should be patriotism, a sense of duty, and a willingness to serve."

Co-Sponoring Legislation: Barack Obama, in line with HRC, co-sponsored legislation to bring Medicaid coverage to low-income, HIV-positive Americans and the Local Law Enforcement Enhancement Act which would expand federal jurisdiction to reach serious, violent hate crimes perpetrated because of the and;actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin, sexual orientation or disability and; of the victim. He did not co-sponsor Uniting American Families Act that would amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide same-sex partners of U.S. citizens the same immigration benefits legal spouses of U.S. residents enjoy.

Barack Obama and Gay Marriage: Although Barack Obama has said that he supports civil unions, he is against gay marriage. In an interview with the Chicago Daily Tribune, Obama said, "I'm a Christian. And so, although I try not to have my religious beliefs dominate or determine my political views on this issue, I do believe that tradition, and my religious beliefs say that marriage is something sanctified between a man and a woman." He said he would support civil unions between gay and lesbian couples, as well as letting individual states determine if marriage between gay and lesbian couples should be legalized.

"Giving them a set of basic rights would allow them to experience their relationship and live their lives in a way that doesn't cause discrimination," Obama said. "I think it is the right balance to strike in this society."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #245
249. Thanks for the background
as it shows a great example of Obama having his cake and eating it too.

You and I both know that he's pandering to anti gay bigots by including MuClurkin on his tour. It couldn't be any more plain than that.

I admire his voting record and most of what he says (I take issue with his seperate but equal marriage stance), but detest his campaign's choice of having McClurkin emcee the SC events.

I'm not naive enough to believe that I'm going to agree with all of a candidate's positions, but the McClurkin thing cuts me and other GLBT people to the core. With all of the bullshit we have to deal with, it feels like a sucker punch for an exgay to be involved with the Obama campaign.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
urgk Donating Member (982 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #249
253. Nope.
"as it shows a great example of Obama having his cake and eating it too."

Um, no it doesn't. It shows Obama's voting record for gay rights. Which, unless Obama is gay, shows him (to beat the phrase to death) giving other people some cake.

Semantics aside, I understand being angry with his choice of emcee, but that doesn't automatically clear Hillary's record ("Marriage has got historic, religious, and moral content that goes back to the beginning of time, and I think a marriage is as a marriage has always been, between a man and a woman," Clinton said.) or make her the better (or more socially progressive) candidate of the two. Considering the polls (and Edwards' wishy-washy record with regards to the same issue), that's the choice we're going to have to make.

Me, I'd take Kucinich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #253
257. I'm not here to compare Obama to Hillary, etc.
I just want a dem to get elected. What upsets me is Obama's wet kiss to a bigot. And you're right, it doesn't erase the good he's done, but it doesn't add to the list either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #159
181. I don't want "tolerance." I want the same rights every other American has.
I'm sick and tired of this "spread tolerance instead of division" mealy-mouthed crap.

I. Don't. Want. Tolerance.

I don't care a flip what anybody thinks about me and the fact that I'm a lesbian. I just don't want them to be able to fire me from my job because of it, or kick me out of my house, or arrest me, or deny my partner the right to visit me in the hospital.

What is so difficult to understand about that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
urgk Donating Member (982 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #181
248. I hear you.
I want the same things for you.

But.

I. Don't. Want. World. War. III.

Nor do I want a theocracy. Or any part of a "liberal" who runs in religious-based social circles with Senator Brownback (who has called her " a beautiful child of the living God.") and Tom Delay.

From The Advocate, Feb 15, 2000: All in the family - Hillary Rodhan Clinton supports Defense of Marriage Act - Brief Article

"She broke ranks with her husband by opposing his "don't ask, don't tell" policy, but when it comes to gay marriage, first lady Hillary Rodhan Clinton is standing by her man. Clinton, who is seeking the Democratic nomination for the U.S. Senate from New York State, said January 10 that she opposes same-sex marriage. She also said she would have voted for the Defense of Marriage Act, a bill passed by Congress in 1996 that prevents federal recognition of same-sex marriage. "Marriage has got historic, religious, and moral content that goes back to the beginning of time, and I think a marriage is as a marriage has always been, between a man and a woman," Clinton said."

So, I posted on this thread to help quiet the anti-Obama fervor. Especially in light of all the rabid Hillary supporters who have jumped on this like hypocrisy is solely the provence of everyone else's candidate.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #159
226. Clarification: I think they all have a lot lacking (the leading contenders)
Clinton is an agent for the worst elements of the political process. Here's proof:

- Hillary embraces the National Prayer Breakfast - http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15157545/
- Here's who they are - http://www.alternet.org/story/16167/

Edwards almost makes it but never quite. He refused to contradict Clinton and Obama about their very
strange notion that we'll still have troops in Iraq in 2013 if they're elected president.

Go for it Edwards! But he seems like he just can't. It's strange. He's smart enough to figure it out
but he just can't let it rip.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baby Snooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
145. God is the only way?
You have to ask whose God? That should settle the question of Obama.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlaxieB Donating Member (359 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #145
160. I thought there was only one God
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #160
164. One , three, forty-six, or none. That is YOUR OPINION.
Not a fact, nothing but your opinion, and you have shown alot of bad opinions of late. IMO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
149. Obama is not going to be the Democratic candidate
This along with Obama's stance on social security made me realize Obama is going no where except back to the Land of Lincoln.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTLawGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
155. It was stupid to let him talk.
no defense from me.

That said, Obama is still the best of a bunch of flawed candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #155
176. I don't think that it was a misstep - I think it was deliberate on the part of Obama's campaign.
Obama's campaign is clearly reaching out - reaching out to homophobes in the south. I believe that this was a deliberate campaign strategy. That sickens me.

That means that Obama is NOT the best of a bunch of flawed candidates. It puts him somewhere in the middle of the Democratic field.

Kucinich is the best candidate declared for the presidency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #176
227. Like when Southern Democrats get those pictures surrounded by Sheriffs
Means one thing to us and another to someone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chulanowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
167. As a mild Obama supporter, I'm sorry, folks
He's dropped out of the running, as far as I'm concerned. I'd had little issue with McClurkin at the event - but like others, I had assumed he would be singing, not preaching.

I can't, however, proclaim that I will abstain from voting, or god fucking forbid go Republican if Obama wins the primaries. I promise you guys... Rudy, Fred, or Ron will be even worse for human rights than Obama, boneheaded move or no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #167
177. It just shows what a mess this country is in - look at our options. Not good.
I'm not excited about ANY of the Democrats running for president, but the worst of them is better than any Republican.

It's one thing to acknowledge that we're going to have to vote for some Democrat, however flawed, and quite another to defend bigotry. I've seen some atrocious excuses made for bigotry over the past few days. We still have a long way to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chulanowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #177
179. I'm pulling harder for Kucinich as each day passes
So what if he's sort or looks funny. I'm more concerned with the contents of his head than the shape of it. I have yet to see anything of this sort come from him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #179
183. He is the only one telling the "unvarnished" TRUTH
Edited on Mon Oct-29-07 05:05 PM by Karenina
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
170. The choice of McClurkin bothers me so much
I thought so much more of Obama. I hate when anyone drives a wedge. I expect this kind of behavior from the GOP, but it is heartbreaking when someone like Obama is hammering the wedge between people.

These campaigns aren't stupid. They micromanage everything down to the last detail. The selection of McClurkin is a choice that someone on the campign made, that someone else signed off on, and on down the line.

I don't know what this says about me, but I'll still vote for Obama should he be the dem nominee. It's just I won't be as elated by that choice as I once was.

I hope we can get past the anti-gay stuff one day. But I'm not holding my breath.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happygoluckytoyou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
172. GO GO GOP GO GO GOP GO GO GOP GO GO GOP...
CLINTON BLAH BLAH BLAH

OSAMA BLAH BLAH BLAH

...THE GOP SMEAR AND WEDGE MACHINE IS IN HIGH GEAR HEADING INTO 2008....

SCREW LABOR...... EDWARDS HAS AN EXPENSIVE HAIRCUT..... CLINTON WAS RUDE.... OBAMA SAID BLAH BLAH.....

--------AND ALL THEY HAVE TO DO IS GET YOU TO SAY "I HATE SO-AND-SO BECAUSE OF THIS VOTE OR THAT STATEMENT"... AND THEY HAVE WON

..............WHEN WILL THE LIBERALS OF THE WORLD LEARN THAT THE GOP AND THEIR MEDIA LOVES TO WATCH US IMPLODE UPON OURSELVES!!!

they love it.... LOVE IT..... THEY TAKE UP AN ISSUE AND HANG IT OVER THE FIRE... WATCH US RUN AROUND LIKE ANTS... WASTE OUR ENERGY FIGHTING OVER HE-SAID SHE-SAID.... BECAUSE THEY KNOW WE THINK AND WE TALK... AND THEY WANT TO CONTROL THE TOPICS.....

THE BEST-BEST-BEST GOP CANDIDATE IS WORSE THAN ANY DEMOCRAT ON THE TICKET.....

A SINGLE DEMOCRAT IN THE WHITEHOUSE... A MAJORITY IN THE HOUSE AND SENATE... A COUPLE LIBERAL JUDGES... AND WE HAVE IT ALL....

--------AND THEN WE CAN DIVIDE THE SPOILS..... AND THEN WE CAN GET OUR WAY....

----------------------BUT LEAVE THE CANDIDATES ALONE AND QUIT FANNING THE FLAMES.... THEY NEED TO WALK STRANGE CENTRIST LINES, TO COURT THE VOTE, TO SPEND THE OUTLANDISH MONEY.... TO WHORE THEMSELVES TO WIN THE ELECTION......
((((((((AND THAT IS JUST THE PLAIN GODS HONEST TRUTH..... NO DIFFERENT THAN GORE HAS TO SPEND FOSSIL FUEL TO GET OUT HIS MESSAGE))))))) ........ HOW ABOUT QUIT THE DEM-WHINING.... AND GO KICK RUDYS ASS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sapphocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #172
175. Can you possibly...
...STOP YELLING?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zazzle Donating Member (220 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
178. Yet another reason I support John Edwards!
and no - he never called gays "those people - another lie spewed by Hillary's DC insider Bob Shrum - and spread by Hillary and Obama supporters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
182. YOU HAVE GOT TO BE KIDDIN' ME. I cannot believe this happened, disgusting
say goodbye to Obama's candidacy!

Sorry about ol' Donnie McClurkin's desires of wanting a man in his bed getting in the way, and his self-hatred rearing it's ugly head and the OBAMA camp allowing him the stage at an OBAMA event to spew anti-gay filth. If he want's to do this, as a GAY man, on his own time, great, but to allow it at an OBAMA event tells me there's no way EVER I'd vote for OBAMA now. He might as well say he's a Republican after throwing us to the back of the bus and allowing the stage to be given to a self-hating sanctimonious pig to tell us that we're sinners for being who GOD made us. I don't want to be Donnie before GOD, I'll gladly answer for myself and beg again for my place with the LORD, but I feel nothing but pity for the swine that is Donnie, and his self-hatred being so strong that he has to attack other gay people to make himself feel like he's accomplishing something in his own life - which is trying to erase his being gay.

You poor sick miserable man.

And Senator Obama, you went from being my backup to Sen. Edwards to being the bottom of the barrel with Tancredo and their ilk.


Shameful that his people allowed this travesty to occur at the OBAMA event.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
186. lest we forget...
and I haven't mentioned this video or the comments made, or the inappropriate laughter from it, since the week it occurred, but it sure says a lot to me with this new much worse slap in our faces...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YZzWYCxjdnY

This is the inappropriate laughter from the Black crowd when Biden, addressing the fears in the Black community and stigma about it, says he knows Barack got tested, then says he got tested for AIDS, and they crack up, then, when Obama could have ignored the laughter of the immaturity of the crowd and told them how serious this issue was - he instead goes on a line of joke telling which made me very upset with him then, but I forgave him, and made him my backup to Edwards, but this newest, far worse issue, has sealed the deal with me - Barack is a bigot. No sorry about it. You would tell your staffers to not even have him speaking beyond his few minutes of singing, and not allowing him to MC the event and go off on a rant about how he has been attacked for what he IS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnionPatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
189. So I guess this is the end
for Obama? I can't imagine what he was thinking when he arranged this. Did he think he was only going to lose the gay vote over this? I'm not gay but I will NEVER vote for anyone who is bigoted toward gays. Obama has just been crossed off my list of possibilities. Too bad. We finally got an African-American and a woman running and I find myself having to vote for the white guy. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #189
190. Why?
McClurkin's not running. HE'S the bigot. Not Obama. Obama made a STUPID choice but he is not a bigot which is why I'm still supporting him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #190
202. PLEASE DO continue to support him.
He's making history and needs all the support he can get. Please do try to understand why this event is a deal-breaker for others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #202
204. Oh, I WILL!
I FULLY support him. He has a great record on gay rights, civil rights, and constitutional rights, as well as having so many other positive qualities I would no way let a poor choice of entertainers and HIS bigoted views stop my support of him. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #204
210. And if you ever get a chance
to speak to him up close and personal, tell him Tante K. across the big pond REALLY wants to know, WHAT THE HELL HE WAS THINKING! ;-) :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #210
213. I won't get a chance...
Edited on Mon Oct-29-07 09:09 PM by jenmito
but you could probably ask him via e-mail or send him a question to answer in one of the upcoming debates. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calteacherguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
192. Your post is so fool of bullshit it's making me gag. I used to respect you. Not anymore. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #192
193. If anyone would understand the taste of bullshit in one's mouth....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #193
194. Yeah, but it's usually making an exit, not an entrance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
...of J.Temperance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #194
197. Hey you!
Haven't come across you today, until I just checked this thread.

Do you have a sore head today huh? Congratulations to your Red Sox....of course, I WAS rooting for them....see how SWEET us Cardinals fans are ;)

Note: Rest of people reading thread, this ISN'T a *gasp* thread-jack....I was just determined to grab Mr. Bluebear today and tell him I'm happy that the Red Sox beat those silly Rockies :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #197
198. Thank you my dear!
We are very happy in evil, liberal New England today! :)

XOXOX
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
...of J.Temperance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #198
200. Fab!
Yeah, ya evil, liberal New Englanders you! :P

XOXOX
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #192
195. thanks for your input, Zandor!!!!!1111
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #192
231. What happened to all the talk and dialog this hate fest would prmote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democratsin08 Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
199. IM ASHAMED OF OBAMA
lets all hope this man can be more understanding of others
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
203. Obama is basically doing a "McCain"
He does not have the judgment necessary to be the democratic nominee.

Church/State/Separate.

There is NO other way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ninja Jordan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
205. Just playing devil's advocate here; but what EXACTLY was bigoted about what McClurkin said?
In actuality he shares the same views as most mainstream American pastors. The Bible preaches against homosexuality etc etc. In his religious view, God was able to deliver him from this behavior. It all logically fits within his religion. I haven't yet read where he's said that gays are abominable, worthless, of the devil, should have no rights etc etc. Only about HIS personal experience vis a vis Christianity. If he is a bigot for believing homosexuality is wrong, then an extremely wide net is being cast here. Plenty of pastors, with whom I'm sure Hillary has appeared, share a similar view.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sandaasu Donating Member (268 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #205
207. Yes, it is a wide net.
There is a lot of bigotry against us, and religion is no excuse for it. Christianity has been used to defend, slavery, racism, and sexism. It was being misused then, and it's being misused now.

McClurkin calls homosexuality a curse, and tries to lead others to attempt to change their sexuality. This is dangerous, even deadly, and to us, it is hate speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ninja Jordan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #207
208. Why the sudden double-standard?
Will you also condemn Hillary, Edwards and other candidates who likely appeared with pastors who hold the exact same views? How s this different?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sandaasu Donating Member (268 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #208
217. It's simply not the same thing.
Going to see such pastors, speaking to their congregations, isn't the same as setting up a stage and putting them on it to speak their views. They haven't yet put such a person up as a headliner in a major campaign event. Not just something they happened to attend, something they themselves arranged, and picked the participants of.

If they were to do something that actually was comparable, I'd be on them for it too. They haven't done that yet though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #208
229. If Hillary or Edwards go on tour with someone who says such thing and gives
them a platform on which to say those things, I'll have the same response.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MessiahRp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #205
209. Are we talking the New Testament or Old Testament
Since the Old Testament is the Hebrew bible in which Jesus isn't even mentioned and the New Testament is the one that teaches Jesus Christ's teachings of love and tolerance. These so-called "Christians" who use the bible for any form of hate speech they like aren't even following Christian teachings or principles because they quote the wrong bible.

So I call BS on the, "that's his religion" crap because if he knew his religion, he'd have read the right book.

Rp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ninja Jordan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #209
211. Well, the New Testament is pretty clear about homosexual acts.
Edited on Mon Oct-29-07 09:03 PM by Ninja Jordan
While Christ teaches unconditional love, the NT still couples homosexuality in with other acts such as adultery and fornication.
See for example 1 Cor 6: 9-10.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sandaasu Donating Member (268 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #211
218. That's a mistranslation.
There was no such term in any language at the time, so if your bible says "homoseuxals" there, that's a mistranslation by default. The only reason you find that there is because Paul used some odd language which linguists today are still uncertain about, and the translators had an anti-homosexual bias, so they make assumptions that reflect that.

In any case, Paul also wrote some terribly sexist things, shall we follow those writings as well? He said a lot of things that went pretty directly against the teachings of Christ found in the gospels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #205
214. The bible condones slavery, too.
Even gives instructions on how a slave should behave toward the master.

The alarm clock went off in this country 38 years ago regarding lesbians and gays. It's high time for church leaders everywhere to wake up.

I'm done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #205
228. His bible also gives instructions on being, and keeping, slaves.
Just FYI.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ninja Jordan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #228
258. Link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Onlooker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
206. Like Hillary, Obama is selling out
They all suck, but they're all vastly better than any Republican, including Ron Paul.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #206
212. they do all suck. I agree. it is amusing to see supporters of a
candidate think everybody sucks but who they support when they ALL are pretty pathetic and about the same. well, the top tier candidates anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scriptor Ignotus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
219. One side (supporters of human rights)
was telling the truth while the other side (the Obama campaign) was spinning distortions about how the Obama fund-raiser was not a anti-gay event.

Let me guess, if you're not pro-life, you must be pro-death. You're either with us or against us!!! Great job buddy, you're doing exactly what the fundies do! You sound just like Bush and his buddies!!





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sandaasu Donating Member (268 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #219
220. Hardly
With this he simply showed more leaning towards that side than I'd like to see from a candidate, so he lost my support. I don't think Obama himself is a homophobe, but he showed his priorities here, and I'm disappointed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scriptor Ignotus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #220
221. i can understand that point of view
but the OP was using wild, radical language and I don't think it's necessary. they flat-out said the event was an anti-gay event, which is just false.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sandaasu Donating Member (268 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #221
222. That's valid
That particular language was rather harsh, but the guy was the MC of the thing, and intended or not, this event does serve to put a grater wedge between the groups involved.

I wouldn't say it was intended to be an anti-gay event though, it just ended up becoming that, in a way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
230. K and R. Who is at all surprised by Obama lying and pandering?
"Don't say that I never told ya"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 01:41 AM
Response to Original message
232. All your rant did here is prove why Obama is now tied with Hillary in Iowa!!
All of your sources are from blogs!
Gee, big surprise there!
Do I need to use the sarcasm smiley?
As if no one on the blogosphere has an opinion!

Atrios is a tool of the DLC and always was!
CNN - already owned by Hill & Co.
NYT - big whoop!
Americablog - nevah heard of it

I guess you guys didn't see Olbermann on Monday night, huh?
I guess you didn't see how he reported that Edwards accused Hill of being the biggest recipient of corporate contributions in this campaign, huh?
Bigger than any REPUBLICAN!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
toughboy Donating Member (78 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 02:29 AM
Response to Original message
234. Can't anyone registered to vote in SC vote for any party's candidate?
Snarky tactic by the Obama campaign, I believe. I think the people of SC are better people than that. Obama could really end up cutting into Guiliani's support in SC. Because Guiliani supporters aren't better than that. They're just seriously misinformed, as I suspect a lot of Obama supporters are feeling right now. I really wanted Obama to be an honest contender. An ethical flim-flam is far worse than just about any other political mistake a campaign can make - in my world. Several months ago I was also impressed by him. I thought he was actually going to represent at least an authentic effort to inspire and uplift people's hopes that a good person could run for President and maybe not win, but help heal this country. He could have won and he could have turned out to be a good man. It's over as far as I'm concerned. The absolutely most painful thing about this to me - and I do not belittle or discount the effect Obama has had in inflicting pain and suffering on both young and old people who are Gays or Lesbians or who love or just live with them as neighbors and friends - is the wretched disappointment and despondency that I hear especially from younger Black and Latino people I love. He's actually hurt a lot of people. He could have prevented that. That, I believe, is a sin. I think a lot of people who would have voted are just going to skip doing so. This is so tragic on so many levels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 03:03 AM
Response to Original message
235. Do you have a transcript of this "half hour revival"?
“God delivered me from homosexuality,”

Which you say shows that he "preached his hate". Maybe there's a whole lot of hate in those five words, but it still does not look like a half hour anti-gay rant to me. Nor does it look like the purpose of his show, or the whole purpose of the fundraiser. The main purpose of a fundraiser is usually funds, and secondly there might be some fun involved too.

The things he said also seemed to be a response to the firestorm his appearance created on the blogosphere. If there had been no firestorm, there might have been no comments.

I have this thing about bigotry. I don't think it is a binary thing, either black or white, that people are either perfectly unbiased or totally bigots. There are degrees, and nobody is perfect, not even midlodemocrat. McClurkin has said a few stupid things, but he has not beaten anybody, killed anybody, or celebrated the death or suffering of anybody, or encouraged others to do so. He's only telling his own story, the way he sees it, and preaching his religion.

I don't see how that makes him 99 and 44/100ths evil. Mid 70s I could see, maybe even low 80s. But "virulant bigot" when his whole "sermon" was less that 1/10th of your OP or my meandering pointless post here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPBasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 05:31 AM
Response to Original message
236. I'm not sold on Obama yet, but it's pretty insulting to say
"the pro-human rights crowd vs. the Obama campaign."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uriel1972 Donating Member (343 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 06:02 AM
Response to Original message
238. I wrote this in another thread
but I think it belongs here too
<I don't know if its been said before,but the "delivering" from homosexuality is the same formula as Coulter's "Jews must be perfected" line. It implies a wrongness in the original state homosexuality or jewishness. Why accept one bigotry and not another, even if it comes from someone who is ex-*? By giving a platform to bigotry is to own that bigotry and Obama must deny it or accept it. He can pretend neutrality, but that is acceptance by default.>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ethelk2044 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 06:48 AM
Response to Original message
239. Posters here on DU trying to sell a Bill of Goods. I am Glad the People in the US
are not like the ones here. They know exactly what Obama was doing instead of the shit they are saying. IT just shows you how for the Hillary and Edwards supporters will try to stoop to get someone to vote for their candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uriel1972 Donating Member (343 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 07:03 AM
Response to Reply #239
241. I'm not sure I understand
are you saying that the people who are criticizing Mr Obama for this event are only supporters of Edwards or Clinton? Because it isn't true in this instance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 07:40 AM
Response to Reply #239
244. Gay people don't need your permission to know when we've been used.
Thanks anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmokingJacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 06:59 AM
Response to Original message
240. Well, I was an Obama supporter.
Over the last several months, his failure to kick any kind of ass has left me extremely disappointed, but I sort of excused it, thinking that he learned a lesson from Howard Dean and didn't want to come on too strong, too soon.

But this is unforgiveable. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meowomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
242. Gee, sorry straight Amerika
I want equal rights. Is that so wrong?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
D23MIURG23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
243. How disappointing
Though I've always seen Obama as a big shiny Rorchach blot - stylistically good, but people are seeing whatever policy they want there because there isn't much record, or substance.

I'm voting for Edwards. No kyl - lieberman vote and no anti-gay bigot rally. (If he appears on my ballot that is - I'm an MI resident)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spiffarino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
246. This is why I reneged on my donation
I promised a donation to Obama's campaign several months ago. Then he sat back and waited on the first "Out of Iraq" bill that went through the Senate. Once they saw which way the wind was blowing - that the bill wouldn't pass - he and Hillary voted in favor. That was when I decided to pull my early support and I sent the money I'd promised to MoveOn.

I'll support any Dem over any Repub in the big race, but for now neither Hillary nor Obama will get my support. I support progressives, not panderers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibraLiz1973 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
254. I'm completely baffled that he has gotten so much support up to this point
He makes my skin crawl.
There is something about him that has never "sat right" with me.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
256. If elected Hillary will be repaying back special interests groups her entire time in office...
that William, you can bank on!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 03:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC