Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Which 2nd or 3rd tier candidate do you trust the most on the IRAN issue?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 09:53 PM
Original message
Poll question: Which 2nd or 3rd tier candidate do you trust the most on the IRAN issue?
I'd say Biden- the man knows what he's talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah, probably Biden.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. Go Biden!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. Kick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. Finally, an easy one!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
5. The Bidenator, of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mark414 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. well, there was this:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seasat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
7. Richardson, Here's his speech on Iran from back in June.
Engaging Iran -- No Preconditions, No Illusions

As we seek to deal with Iran, we need to recognize that country's national pride and its own perceptions of threats to its security. We also must understand that the following are Iran's main policy goals:

* They want their legitimate right to civilian nuclear technologies as a member of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty to be respected;
* They want stability on their borders, most notably with Iraq and Afghanistan -- and they DON'T want the civil war in Iraq to spin out of control, with millions of Iraqi refugees spilling into Iran and other neighboring countries;
* They want to be free of external security threats, either from within the region (Israel) or outside the region (the United States);
* They want to be able to develop regional energy and economic partnerships;
* They want integration into the global economy, including membership in the World Trade Organization and an end to trade and financial embargoes;


The P5+1 package represents an excellent starting point for negotiations which, I believe, can result in a diplomatic solution that keeps Iran from developing nuclear weapons and also achieves progress on a range of regional and international economic and security issues. The June 2006 package included the following important elements:

* Acknowledgment of Iran's right to peaceful nuclear energy;
* The creation of a five-year fuel bank/buffer stock of nuclear fuel for Iran;
* An international fuel-cycle center in Russia involving Iran;
* An energy partnership among Iran, the European Union, and others
* Trade and investment incentives;
* A regional security forum involving Iran, other regional states, the US, Russia and China;
* A willingness on the part of the United States to talk directly with Iran.

On this last point, our country has other interests that we must discuss directly with Iran, including:

* Iran's help in forging stable governments in Iraq and Afghanistan;
* The end of threats and inflammatory rhetoric against Israel;
* Concrete and verifiable steps to end military support for Hezbollah, Hamas, and other violent groups.


The speech, like one of his typical speeches is very long and detailed. He outlines a plan to negotiate directly with Iran, stop
"Saber Rattling", and actually acknowledge past US failures with Iran. He actually mentions our involvement in over throwing their government, supporting the Shah, and supporting Iraq in a war against Iran. Few politicians mention that but the reality is that frames our negotiations with them and is the reason they refuse to trust us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesertFlower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
8. biden. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
9. Kick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
10. Richardson. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
11. definitly Biden
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-01-07 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
12. Richardson. And otherwise I can't stand him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC